CompuServe Thread

#WUTIL and MS-DOS 3.10

8 messages in this thread
#21075From: Willett KemptonJul 22, 1990 12:14 AM
A month or so ago, there was a thread here about problems with WUTIL 3.12 and Suitable Solutions' MS-DOS 3.10b. Specifically, WUTIL hung when run under DOS 3.10. The person having the problem was advised to not use WUTIL. I was curious about this, since the documentation explicitly says it was modified to run under DOS 3.10. So I tried it under DEC's "Internal use only" release, MS-DOS 3.10.17. It works great. Apparently all WUTIL's testing and adapting to "DOS 3" was DEC's internal DOS version! For a 20 meg disk on a 100B, I initialized and partitioned with WUTIL, and installed WUTIL's boot loaders. Then I rebooted to SS's MS-DOS 3.10b, did an MS-DOS FORMAT, and was up and running. No problems in the intervening two weeks. The reason this may be of practical interest is that WUTIL works well on larger disks, it is easy to use and provides a lot of functions, and it installs a superior boot loader menu (just hit Do, no need to arrow to OS boot choice). Does anyone know of a problem I've created this way that I just haven't noticed yet? I'm planning to write the "new author" of WUTIL (Vinzenz Esser, taking over from Tony Camas) and report the hang on SS MS-DOS 3.10, in hopes that he'll be interested in looking to fix it.
#21084From: Roy PasiniJul 23, 1990 2:55 PM
Yes, I know of a problem you've created and haven't noticed: The boot loaders for 3.10B are larger than for previous versions to accommodate the new I-Drives. You will be unable to use the new I-Drives if you don't FORMAT E: /L. I used to use WUTIL, but when I got 40M disks and 3.10B I found I didn't need it. But even now, I am running a 20M disk that was originally setup by WUTIL with 3.10B (but it has an old I-Drive, and even then, I did a FORMAT E: /L). So I recommend doing *exactly* what Suitable Solutions suggests on page 2 of the July 1989 3.10b Release Notes: – Initialize with DEC's utility for disk 20M and smaller; or with a third-party utility like CHS's DISKPART for > 20M – Partition with FDISK (from 3.10B) – Format with FORMAT (from 3.10B)
#21119From: Willett KemptonJul 29, 1990 11:40 PM
Roy and Len – Thanks for the advice on WUTIL and DOS 3.10B. However, I was unable to re-initialize an ST225 (20 Meg) with DEC's Winchester utility 2.0. It thought the disk was a 10Meg and gave me two 5 meg CP/M partitions. What worked was a "Format and Initialize" with WUTIL (under DOS 3.10.17), then booting DOS 3.10B, using FDISK for the partition, and using DOS's FORMAT E:/L for the final format. It seems to work fine, and I'm still getting WUTIL's boot menu, which is great. Roy, you suggested that I initialize with DISKPART or another 3rd party utility. Since I don't have CHS DISKPART, I don't have any choice for initializing my disk other than WUTIL, right? (Expecially if I go over 20 Meg.) Do you still think I'm going to get into trouble, using WUTIL only to initialize the disk? CHS DISKPART hasn't been released to the public domain now that the company has disappeared, has it? – Willett Kempton ps. I'm using the old, not new I-drive, but since I've done FORMAT E:/L that shouldn't matter anyway.
#21131From: Roy PasiniAug 1, 1990 7:07 PM
As I recall, Initialization just gets your hard disk controller talking to your hard disk. A hardware thing. So you use the initialization software provided with the hard disk controller you put in your machine. Whatever works, works. I don't think you are getting *WUTIL's* boot menu. That's built into the Rainbow. When you don't select an autoboot partition, but tell the Rainbow to boot from W, you get a menu of partitions. So, if you used FDISK and FORMAT, you have *not*, in effect, used WUTIL to partition and format your drive, the functions WUTIL and 3.10B make trouble over.
#21132From: Willett KemptonAug 2, 1990 12:28 AM
Thanks for the info. It helps me feel more secure that I've got a hard disk setup that won't suprise me later. The A B C D W T menu is in Rainbow firmware, but the partition boot menu says "WUTIL version" on it, so it's pretty clearly WUTIL's. Also, when I LDCOPY E: on the CP/M-86/80 side, the WUTIL's menu gets replaced by the DEC one. Anyway, from what you've said, this method seems safe. Thanks. By your not saying otherwise, I assume you *don't* know of CHS making any arrangements for public-domain status of their formatting software, since they're no longer selling it.
#21137From: Roy PasiniAug 2, 1990 8:15 PM
CHS has disappeared. The program is not in the public domain. One of my pet ideas is to make available all commercial products no longer supported by the manufacturer. After all, they no longer sell the things, provide help, or even admit to their existence, so why shouldn't we spread them around? Because it's illegal, that's why. So I certainly won't. But I can't help thinking it's a good idea….
#21142From: Dan DoellAug 3, 1990 7:33 AM
I'm with you all the way. I've thought for a long time that if a copyright holder doesn't provide in a reasonable period of time either copies of their material or permission/license to make copies, they should forfeit their copyright.
#21089From: Len BerkJul 23, 1990 8:06 PM
Willett, I also seem to recall a problem with Windows if you use WUTIL. Mike Pasini may be able to tell you more. In any case, for Windows users the best idea is to follow Suitable Solutions's instructions to the letter. –Len