CompuServe Thread

#CBM loses $3.5M for qtr

15 messages in this thread
#116806From: Scott HarrisAug 14, 1990 11:26 PM
I read that the Amiga computers were part of the reason the Sears bid was disputed. Something like they substituted a different keyboard (I think the bid specified 100+ keys) and maybe an accelerator board, but that particular configuration did not have prior FCC approval, something apparently required by the bid. ===Scott.
#116812From: Don Curtis/SYSOPAug 14, 1990 11:40 PM
Scott, While what you say may well be true…it'd be odd if it were. The Amiga doesn't use "generic" keyboards…they must be specific to the Amiga, thus it'd be difficult to substitute keyboards for the Amiga…since I know of no substitutes for the Amiga keyboard. Also, configurations don't need FCC approval…just the separate parts, that is…the computer, monitor and any add-on parts need FCC approval, but you don't have to set up that specific configuration and get it approved. Don
#116849From: Charles HillAug 15, 1990 8:49 AM
RE #: 116812 TO: Don Curtis/SYSOP 76703,4321 Don, C-Ltd made three different substitue keyboards for the Amiga before they went under. I believe that I've seen reports of this part of their product line being picked up by another company– can't remember who, though. Also there have been reports from various persons on AmigaTech (month or so ago) that one of the OmniKey keyboards for PCs has a dip-switch setting labeled "Amiga". No one verified whether or not it actually worked in an Amiga (I assume A2xxx) but it was labeled as such. -Chas
#116889From: Mike Spille/ManxAug 15, 1990 5:51 PM
I have heard that Northgate (don't know if they're any relation to OmniKey) has a switchable keyboard that works with the Amiga 2000 and 3000. A fellow on BIX claims to own one. -Mike
#116913From: Lloyd W. Dull IIIAug 15, 1990 9:07 PM
Charles, While I don't have one, I can confirm that Northgate's ad for their Omnikey Ultra does specifically mention Amiga compatability. Lloyd
#116970From: Ethan SolomitaAug 16, 1990 10:50 AM
Don, a wild guess, but perhaps they used A1000 keyboards returned in the swap? — Ethan
#117022From: Don Curtis/SYSOPAug 16, 1990 11:37 PM
Ethan, I'd bet dollars to dougnuts that the returned A1000 keyboards went into the trash. A reputable company doesn't take used parts and sell them as new. Commodore is a reputable company. In my opinion…the idea behind returning the keyboards was to take the A1000's out of circulation…not to add to their production (or spare parts) stock. Don
#117048From: Charles HillAug 17, 1990 9:58 AM
Don, The A1000 keyboards COULD be used for dealer/demo and developer units that are not for sale to the general public. They could also be cannibalized for replacement parts. Having them on hand for developers of CDTV is not a bad idea– depending on how many CDTV keyboards have been produced. -Chas
#117109From: Don Curtis/SYSOPAug 17, 1990 10:12 PM
Chas, Cannibalizing is no different than selling the whole keyboard as new, you don't sell used parts as new parts…period. Also, the cost of cannibalizing is probably higher than the cost of a new part. Dealer demo units are no different than new units, they just have a lower price to the dealer…they should be new units, not part new, part used. IF they wished to sell them to developers and sold them as USED parts (at about 1/3 the cost of a new part) fine…as long as it's made very clear it's a used part. But aside all that…the A2000 (and I presume the 3000, but don't know) keyboard is compatible with the A1000 keyboard (and vice versa). So why not just use the 2000 keyboard. A connector adaptor is all that's needed. Don
#117164From: Steve AhlstromAug 18, 1990 2:02 PM
Don, I don't have it handy but I think I read a message a couple of weeks back that said that someone at SIGGRAPH asked CBM about the CDTV keyboards and if they were recycled 1000 keyboards — the answer was that they are indeed the same but new, CBM did a new production run on them. Then again, I may be hallucinating. -sja
#117069From: Tony MuscarellaAug 17, 1990 3:30 PM
Northgate apparently makes a keyboard that will work with an Amiga, their top-of-line model. ..tony m…
#116920From: Steven D. KapplinAug 15, 1990 9:22 PM
Scott, Yep, that's what the story said. Sears had included the Amiga, but the contract called for a keyboard with more keys than the Amiga keyboard provided. The accelerator board also did not meet the level of FCC approval that the contract required. However, the story also stated that there were other bid discrepancies not related to the Amiga, so Amigas, alone, were not the only reason Sear's bid was overturned. Steve
#116942From: John BonoAug 16, 1990 12:29 AM
What I heard was that though the Amiga had less keys than they required, the contract was not rejected on that basis; i.e. the contract was rejected, it was not due to the lack of extra keys, though that was mentioned in the report, it was due to several other things that were not Amiga-related. John
#117083From: Steven D. KapplinAug 17, 1990 7:07 PM
John, Yeh, I remember something to that effect. On a positive note I've seen the Amiga prominently mentioned on Computer Chronicles, now, twice in two months. Latest was a repeat of an earlier show, but it's about time something other than PCs and Macs get the spotlight. Steve
#116933From: MicroSearch/Greg WhiteAug 15, 1990 11:20 PM
Scott, According to "Computer Reseller News" the Amiga had nothing to do with the loss of the contract. Among the 16 reasons for rejection were such as the laptops offered weighed more than the required 16 pounds and Sears had substituted 286 machines in many cases where 386's were specifed. Greg Greg White / MicroSearch 72230,1617 We listen to our customers..carefully