CompuServe Thread

#Software VTR Controller

12 messages in this thread
#31416From: Ken Loss-CutlerAug 9, 1991 10:42 PM
Well, never let it be said that I was too proud to admit when I was wrong. In a recent letter/file combination, I chose to tease many of you with the proposition of using a 100% software product to drive your single-frame animation requirements. I was a bit premature. The product DOES exist, and works with most every operating system except Amiga. The company which manufactures the software does have plans to ultimately port their software to the Amiga platform, but now is NOT the time to begin selling it {:-) Again, let me apologize to the Forum. The mistake was purely mine and was in no way prompted by the manufacturer of the software (who shall remain mercifully unnamed by me <grin>) Those of you who had asked for literature, if you will Easyplex me again I will assume that you are STILL interested and forward the literature to you right away. Ken Loss-Cutler
#31474From: Pete GouldAug 10, 1991 11:04 PM
Ken, There IS a product for the Amiga which functions much as you describe. It's an almost all-software product (there is a hardware adapter cable included) which will single-frame professional 3/4", SVHS and BetaCam decks, and it costs about $400. It's called the Personal SFC (Single Frame Controller) and it's produced by a company in Canada (available through MicroPace and the other major distributors). I've ordered one from Briwall to try out on our Beta-SP editing system & will let you know the results. Pete
#31500From: Ken Loss-CutlerAug 11, 1991 12:17 PM
Pete, Thanks for the info! I would be VERY interested in the results of your tests. I have not heard of this product. How can I get some literature? Ken Loss-Cutler
#31628From: Pete GouldAug 12, 1991 7:30 PM
Ken, Unfortunately, the data about the Personal SFC is at my office, and my modem is at home. There's a capsule review of the unit in this month's AVID, if you have a copy (mine's also at the office). I should have my unit soon & will release a review as soon as it arrives. Best regards, Pete
#31639From: Ken Loss-CutlerAug 12, 1991 9:15 PM
Pete: I saw a Personal SFC writeup in a Dallas computer rag. There are a few tradeoffs for the price, of course. Like you have to have a deck that generates its own SMPTE if you need to use timecode. It will not capture, so no rotoscoping is possible yet. It will soon support Firecracker and some other buffers/formats but still is limited to the NewTek 3D product. The price, though, is right! I am forwarding the description, etc. to the SoftVTR people so they can "evaluate the competiton". Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Ken Loss-Cutler
#31933From: Pete GouldAug 15, 1991 8:09 PM
Ken, Support for Firecracker is already available (that's what I've got — a Firecracker and Imagine). And the units I'll be connecting to are Sony Betacam-SP decks, which do have built-in SMPTE generators, so I'm all set there as well. I'll let you know how I make out — my unit's on backorder. Pete
#31965From: John PendergrassAug 15, 1991 11:23 PM
Pete, I haven't been following this thread so far, but your message intrigues me…. are you saying that there is a version of Imagine that uses the FireCracker24 directly? For viewing from within Imagine? My 'FireCracker' button is always ghosted in my Imagine….. –jp–seattle–
#32080From: Pete GouldAug 17, 1991 12:31 AM
John, No, they still haven't released a copy of Imagine that will do that. With a third-party product called the "Personal SFC", though, I can do single frame animation on our Beta-SP editing system, and the Personal SFC will take care of loading the frames into the FC-24 prior to triggering each edit. It is still necessary to render the animation into a series of 24-bit images. Pete
#32126From: John PendergrassAug 17, 1991 11:19 AM
Thanks Pete. Still rendering 24bit images…. and then going elsewhere to view them on FireCracker24. You'd THINK that if Virtual Realities can program VistaPro to use use the FireCracker24 as a display device, that Impulse could do the same for Imagine? After all, they make both of them. Sheesh. –jp–seattle–
#32177From: Pete GouldAug 18, 1991 12:48 AM
Can't say I haven't wondered about that myself……. Still, if I'm going to do single frame animation, it's easier on the record deck to run all the frames out to disk and then run the tape off in one shot. Otherwise it has to sit in pause while the next frame is rendered, which is harder on the deck and the tape. So in my case, I'd just as soon use Imagine to render the frames to disk and SFC to put them on tape at a later time. Pete
#32170From: Jim SteeleAug 17, 1991 10:58 PM
Pete, At the store where I work, we ordered a copy of the "Personal SFC" so one of our institutional customers could evaluate it. He reported that it worked fine, after fixing a minor glitch with hardware. (Probably induced by us looking inside the cable.) He rendered out an animation I did with Videoscape using his Toaster (and VO9850) and one of his own using Vista Pro. I was impressed. _jim
#32178From: Pete GouldAug 18, 1991 12:48 AM
Thanks, Jim. My Personal SFC is currently backordered; will report back when I receive it. Pete