CompuServe Thread

#Toaster & IBM questions?

33 messages in this thread
#71663From: HARRISON J. CHASTANG IIIJan 6, 1994 8:54 PM
I just went to the Macworld convention and saww something called the Video Machine made in Germany. It's a nine input switcher, has more than 200 DVE, has an built in audio mixing system with eight XLR inputs, an A-B roll edit system, CG and time base corrector built in…but hold on to your seats….IT CAN RUN ON THE MAC…AND ON IBM COMPATABLE COMPUTERS. I was about ready to buy a toaster but the Video Machine is what we IBM users have been waiting for a long time. But I wonder what will happen to Amigas. With the technology now to do serious desktop video on MACs and PCs, will Nu-Tek be forced to give up the Amiga platform?
#71668From: Vance SchowalterJan 6, 1994 11:16 PM
PMFJI… First of all, the Video Toaster is made by NewTek, not Nu-Tek. Nu-Tek is another company. Does that glorious Video Machine have optional rendering speeds exceeding Cray 1 supercomputers? Does it have a paint program? Does it have at the very least an equivalent to Lightwave? Can it dump animations to tape, live, without the need of a single frame controller? Are the 200 transitions in 24bit colour and are they animated with alpha-channel sounds? Does it have more than one 24 bit frame buffer? Does it have the sheer number of dedicated 3rd party software and hardware? Does it (efficiently) multi-task? Has it won an Emmy for revolutionizing television? What's the price? From what you've described of the Video Machine, it has little to be in competition with the Toaster. Even if it had all of what the Toaster had for features, NewTek is many man-years ahead with the technology. As for the Amiga, it's still a superior multi-media product when compared to the other platforms. There's no reason for NewTek to abandon all that they've built, when they are doing VERY well with the Amiga platform. I made this swipe at your comment, because your comments were not very kind and inaccurate. Video Machine sounds like it holds alot of promise for editing. For the rest of we creative people, however, will take Lightwave and the Toaster anytime. I would consider Video Machine for editing, if, and only if, the evolution of the Toaster and its extras cease. By all means, enjoy what you work with. We do. *B^) -= Vance =- Image Master Flying high on Black Belt Systems' Imagemaster R/t!
#71739From: HARRISON J. CHASTANG IIIJan 7, 1994 10:17 PM
Granted the Video Machine does not do amimation. For many people who have wanted to work with the toaster but for one reason or another could not get their hands on an Amiga, I think folks will utilize this system because the platform is more accessable than the amiga, especially the PC. I think the niche for the Video Machine will be production truck and field production that in the past used to require a lot of hardware (audio mixer, CG, TBCs). Folks said you could never any type of video production programs to run on a PC, and if you can produce and edit video on a PC or MAC with the same quality of a toaster, what advantage would the amiga have over other computers.
#71750From: Vance SchowalterJan 8, 1994 1:46 AM
It all depends on how quality is defined. With the right hardware, you can get broadcast quality on most platforms. So that part is moot. If you define it as also how the output is enhanced with imagery, then the Toaster still wins. The Amiga 4000 allows the Toaster to have exceptional full-colour animated with sound transitions overlayed on video. The Toaster and the Amiga have already entrenched themselves in the industry and production with the tool is at an explosive rate. I noticed that you are basing your opinions largely on the opinions of video hardware retailers. Well, I hate to say this, being a consultant myself, but they will tell you anything, to sell you their products. Including such glib comments about their product being better than the Toaster. Judging by the prices you quoted on the VM, their opinions are ruled by the larger profit margin. Talk to actual professional Toaster users instead of a salesperson, if you want the most constructive input. The biggest problem with PC's are that most of them are clones and do not always emulate the standards laid down by IBM for PC's. Hence, you can run into alot of incompatibility hassles. Mac's are a better choice then a PC, mainly because they have a more reliable OS and they don't have the clone problem that IBM has. The problem with the Mac, like the PC, is that it was not designed to be a multi-media/video machine. The Amiga has the best OS (IMHO) because it has the best realization of multi-tasking/multi-media/video on any personal platform, it has an excellent ARexx scripting language that allows you to add many features that software you are using might not have. It will also allow applications to work together and use each other's features. I attended a Windows multi-media show that had the #1 multi-media executive from MicroSoft putting on a show for the attendees. It was embarrassingly hard to sit through it and see this fellow from California who couldn't get 60% of the cream of PC multi-media hardware and software to run at all! Can you imagine our suprise when he resorted to asking us how to use some Windows functions and eventually asking for help to get the hardware running. Not to mention the large suitcase-sized encoder/ sync generator used to display the output of the PC on the video projector. This stuff is top of the line for the PC and is tragic to see serious attempts from such hype. Windows looks pretty, and that's about all that I can say that was positive about it. For the price of an Amiga 1200 and DPaint 4.5, what can you do with a PC or Mac for video? Nothing. Period. An A1200 can output to video, right out of the box. You can make and playback animations, titles and pictures using just DPaint. You get 262,144 colours displayable in any of the Amiga's low or high resolutions. All of the Amigas also have stereo sound without having to get a soundcard first. It's in a chip. You don't have to get another S-VGA card or 24-bit card, because this has all of the colour you'll need to produce great video. So, even without a Toaster, the Amiga kicks video butt. I LIKE Macs alot for desktop publishing. It's their niche. I LIKE PCs alot for having the best business software around. It's their niche. I LOVE the Amiga alot for having the best integral base for professional video production. It's their niche. Every Amiga critic since the introduction of the A1000 said it would die within 6 months. Well, Atari computers have come and gone. The Amiga is still here and still popular with creative people. The true innovations in personal video production belong to the Amiga. Black Belt Systems was the first to bring professional morphing to a desktop platform. The Toaster was another first that left the other platforms in cold sweat. Hewlett Packard, for example, uses the Toaster to produce their corporate videos because the PC and Mac had nothing that was as versatile. Video Machine, like I said, sounds like it has nice features. But it ain't a Toaster and probably will never be. NewTek has alot of plans in the works for the future improvements on the Toaster and because they don't whistle blow what they're doing, it always gives them the advantage of catching other manufacturers off-guard. PC or Mac is more accessible than the Amiga? The Amiga/Toaster is being used in countries like Poland. How inaccessible does it have to be?? When you have a product like the Amiga/Toaster, people will go to great lengths to get it. The Toaster has penetrated Japan's television market! How many other American high-tech products can make the same claim? Like it or not, the Amiga isn't going away anytime soon. Enjoy the Video Machine. -= Vance =- Image Master Flying high on Black Belt Systems' Imagemaster R/t!
#71794From: Patrick WhiteJan 8, 1994 11:15 PM
Vance, VERY WELL PUT…..(message to harrison about the Toaster vs the Video Kaching$$$$ (machine)). % ) Burning the Midnight Toast Patrick White
#71867From: HARRISON J. CHASTANG IIIJan 9, 1994 9:30 PM
When I said accessible, I meant that it is much easier to find places selling new and used machines. If you're really determined to get an Amiga, you'll find one anywhere you live but with PCs and Macs you're never too far from somebody selling them. In my experience with PC's I've had more problems with IBM stuff than from the clones. The people I've talked to so far about the Video Machine are vendors who sell professional equipment and also sell the Toaster, and I respect their opinion. They've said that if your application is straight editing and live-live/tape production, the VM matches the toaster. However if you want to do amination or 3-D imaging, then the toaster is the machine you want. I guess why I'm so excited about the VM is that it is something that I (and most other people I know in video) thought would never happen, that is professional quality (or that matter, any quality video) on the PC. I'm going to take a long, hard look at the VM and see what other people are doing on it, and if I hear good things from them, I may get it. Thanks for the feedback.
#71879From: Vance SchowalterJan 10, 1994 1:50 AM
I respect your choice, of course, and wish you total success with it. I simply get irked when I'm told that the Amiga and Toaster are going the way of the Doe-doe, just because some other new product is released. Like the Toaster, VM will have to earn its stripes. BTW, the $4500 for a Toaster, must have been referring to a decked out Toaster Workstation. That is, an Amiga 4000 with Video Toaster card and software installed, 200, or so, MB hard drive and 18 mb ram. In any case, if you bought a Toaster card and software, you'd be paying $1869 in some stores. Competition between stores might affect that price quote, too. For the feedback, anytime. And no hard feelings, I hope. *B^) -= Vance =- Image Master Flying high on Black Belt Systems' Imagemaster R/t!
#71941From: Arnie CachelinJan 10, 1994 10:29 PM
If you get a chance to look at the video signal on a scope, please let us know how it looks, their ads don't seem to claim a broadcastable signal, but then again, they don't say they don't have one. The quality of the Toaster's encoder and signal are MAIN selling points for many video types.
#71957From: Paul ToalJan 11, 1994 5:03 AM
The VM is built in and for PAL. It doesn't work right for NTSC yet. Tech support is a trans-Atlantic phone call. Anybody can do quality work even with second best though. For $10,000 I think you can do better. NLE is more realistic and for the same money to boot. –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#72391From: Charles BlaquiereJan 16, 1994 3:04 PM
Vance, interesting message… but you forgot to mention a couple of points. Toaster doesn't do PAL. If this Video Machine works in PAL and NTSC, the worldwide accessibility factor turns to VM's advantage. Secondly, what about all the editing-related functions Harrison listed? Like it or not, most people will prefer editing functions over animated Kiki effects; this is one major point in favor of most of Toaster's rivals. Blaq!
#72400From: Vance SchowalterJan 16, 1994 9:25 PM
But that's exactly my point. These other cards aren't even Toaster rivals, since they don't have alot of what the Toaster offers. As for the FAST Video Machine working in PAL, the Toaster may not have it native to its board, but a card has been available for several months that converts the Toaster's displays and output into PAL format. So, the european market has already been opened up to the Toaster. I believe the card will also convert to SECAM format. A VERY useful product for all. It doesn't matter whether I like Kiki effects or not. The fact they are there gives users more creative options than not having them. Besides, custom animated transitions can be made by the user, too. That option can be extremely useful, if that's something the user wants to try out. The VM can do 'extremely' well in sales, but that will not affect Toaster sales as might be believed. The main reason for that, is, most Toaster users are buying the Toaster to use the Lightwave. Having a system with absolutely everything, including A-B rolling editing control, can be extremely limiting. I'd rather have a modular system like the Toaster, which gives you a number of goodies to start with, and then have all of that 3rd party support line of products for you to pick and choose from to incorporate within Toaster control. Like I said before, VM is a useful tool, but just because it's useful, doesn't mean that the Toaster is supposed to disappear. -= Vance =- Image Master Flying high on Black Belt Systems' Imagemaster R/t!
#72446From: Mike ReedJan 17, 1994 3:23 PM
> Besides, custom animated transitions can > be made by the user, too. I have T-Rexx and DPaint AGA and have created several new switcher transitions. I have been unable to create any color effects (KikiBell Type). I have also never attached a sound to a transition (Breaking Glass Type). If either of these things are possible, please tell me what I need.
#72459From: Vance SchowalterJan 17, 1994 6:49 PM
The transitions are created through Lightwave. If you wanted your own Kiki, I'd imagine you'd have to do flat object wraps of several captured frames of the subject you wish to use. I don't have a Toaster handy here, but I had read about it being available for T4000 owners. You might want to ask Erik Flom or other old hands of Toaster users. My role is currently selling Toasters up here in Western Canada, not using them myself. Hopefully in the not-too-distant future, I'll have one on hand. My boss is getting me involved in a new video production department of Highland Grey Consulting inc. Currently, I'm blessed with Imagine 2.9, a great alternative for users who cannot afford the Toaster, as yet.
#71717From: Peter GreciJan 7, 1994 3:19 PM
The Question here is, How much does this "Video Machine" Cost and does it work as claimed? Matrox Studio SOUNDS like a Great setup, I've seen their Demo Tape, then I read LOTS of things about it NOT liking ALOT of IBM/1Clones amd Costing $10,000(realistically more like $20,000) for the BASIC system not including the Computer which they recommend you purchase from them "To avoid Compatability problems"………….BTW The makers of the Toaster are NEWTEK not NU-Tek, two different Companies.
#71740From: HARRISON J. CHASTANG IIIJan 7, 1994 10:27 PM
the video machine set-up cost four grand with an jog edit controller about another $500. it runs on a minimum 386 it requires a lot of memory…about 20 meg, but uses little hard drive space. the professional video stores selling the Video Machine say its being used already by European broadcasters and say if you budget minded, this machine is better than the toaster. if you're starting from scratch, the toaster card is about 5 grand, a kitchen sync is about $1000 each, a amilink a-b editor is about another two grand and a two track, eight input audio mixer is somewhere between 1 and 2 thousand dollars. you've spent about ten grand for a complete toaster suite where all this is included in the Video Machine for less than 5 grand.
#71772From: Peter GreciJan 8, 1994 1:15 PM
I wish you well with the Video Machine.
#71781From: JERRY HATCHETTJan 8, 1994 5:09 PM
Harrison, Believe it or not, the only motivation anyone on here has in recommending the Toaster to you and others starting out in this business is to help _you_. There is no possible motivation for anyone to blindly defend the Toaster or any other product. Within the realm of 'normal' folks trying to get into the video business, there is simply no comparison to the Toaster, and that is a fact, not just an opinion. There is _nothing_ on the PC or Mac platforms that even comes remotely close to competing with the Toaster's value-to-dollar ratio. << the professional video stores selling the Video Machine say its being used already by European broadcasters and say if you budget minded, this machine is better than the toaster. >> What, pray tell, are they SUPPOSED to say, given the fact that the Toaster dealers are their competitors? << if you're starting from scratch, the toaster card is about 5 grand, >> No matter where you're starting from, the Toaster card and software sells virtually everywhere for under 2 grand… << a kitchen sync is about $1000 each, >> A Kitchen Sync is a board that contains 2 TBC's, and has a suggested retail list price of only $1295… << a amilink a-b editor is about another two grand >> That's about right. Or you might consider Future Video's new controller at about $1300… << and a two track, eight input audio mixer is somewhere between 1 and 2 thousand dollars. >> You need to call Musician's friend @ 1-800-776-5173. They'll send you a catalog very quickly that will offer you a MYRIAD of choices to show you just how blatantly incorrect this is… << you've spent about ten grand for a complete toaster suite where all this is included in the Video Machine for less than 5 grand. >> If you want to produce high quality video in an A/B roll setup on ANY platform, you're gonna end up spending more than 5 grand. If someone is doing it for $5K, politely ask them to send you a demo reel of work produced on their setup. For the purpose of contrast, I'm sure several Toaster owners on these forums would be happy to send you their demo reel. BTW, I was, and still am, an owner and user of a PC-based Novell network. For the things I use it for, it's irreplaceable. 18 months ago, I'd never even touched an Amiga, and was extremely skeptical. Luckily, I heeded the advice of many who had been in my shoes before, and made the right decision to buy a Toaster setup. The PC-Mac world is still not even remotely in the same ball park when it comes to video production. With sincere best wishes that you choose appropriately, Jerry
#71869From: HARRISON J. CHASTANG IIIJan 9, 1994 9:53 PM
The vendors I've talked to are selling the toaster now and say that for specific applications (editing, live switching, field and studio production, the VM is equal to the Toaster, but for post production, particularly for special effects and animation the toaster is a better machine. I'll call your friend but I quoted my prices from the Allied/Harris catalog on something small like the shure FP42, a 4 input field mixer. They listed the Tascam M-208 8 input studio mixer at $1199. I think the final factor on editing quality is the format used. Something cut on a CMX and one inch or a BVW machine is going to look better than something on high 8. Having the right decks makes a world of difference on how the final product turns out. I saw the latest edition of the Toaster being advertised for about $4500. Maybe this was the combination of the Toaster and Amiga?
#71913From: Peter GreciJan 10, 1994 4:12 PM
$4500 it's DEFINITELY a Toaster Card and An Amiga. The Toaster Card itself can be had as low as $1869 with the current software.
#71942From: Arnie CachelinJan 10, 1994 10:29 PM
noone in their right mind would advertise a product with an MSRP of $2395 for $4500 (cool new cars excluded), that is about right for a pretty loaded system (Amiga and all)
#72194From: Anthony RamirezJan 13, 1994 10:09 PM
>the video machine set-up cost four grand with an jog edit controller >about another $500. >the toaster card is about 5 grand, a kitchen sync is about $1000 each, Speaking of the Video Machine, for $4,000 what do you get? Does this include the PC and accesories? <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)
#72265From: Peter GreciJan 14, 1994 4:03 PM
Guess What Tony, all this Time I thought Harrison's Video Machine was a NEW product……. I just realized it's the FAST Video Machine.
#72730From: Anthony RamirezJan 21, 1994 6:14 PM
>all this Time I thought Harrison's Video Machine was a NEW product……. >I just realized it's the FAST Video Machine. I new it was the Fast machine he was talking about but not having used one myself I'd like to know as much as I can. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)
#72268From: HARRISON J. CHASTANG IIIJan 14, 1994 4:31 PM
it's the card and a box that contains audio, video and edit control input and outputs.
#72729From: Anthony RamirezJan 21, 1994 6:14 PM
>it's the card and a box that contains audio, video and edit control input >and outputs. So a computer, ram and HD is extra? <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)
#72795From: HARRISON J. CHASTANG IIIJan 22, 1994 1:01 PM
yes it is. mac or pc with windows.
#71723From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPJan 7, 1994 4:26 PM
You left out some vital info…. How much does it cost?
#71741From: HARRISON J. CHASTANG IIIJan 7, 1994 10:27 PM
its about 4 grand for PCs, a thousand more for Macs
#71795From: Patrick WhiteJan 8, 1994 11:15 PM
Have seen a Toaster demonstrated? Call 1-800-847-6111 at NewTek for a Free demo tape of the Video Toaster 3.1. It will blow your BNCs loose!!! I've seen the Video Machine….the salesperson could NOT get it to run properly..( I won't blame the complicated VM though.) Try it (the Toaster), You'll Love it!! (IMBHO) Burning the Midnight Toast Patrick White
#71872From: HARRISON J. CHASTANG IIIJan 9, 1994 9:58 PM
I have it and the Toaster is an amazing machine and it did blow my BNCs loose, but sitting around here with all these PCs around me, I would always say "why can't they make something like this for the PC. I would find another dealer. If a vendor doesn't understand a product forwards, backwards and sideways, they shouldn't be selling the product. The VM dealer around here is also a Toaster dealer and they can virtually take apart and put back together both machines.
#71875From: Patrick WhiteJan 9, 1994 10:43 PM
Check into the Toaster more before you buy. You'll be happy that you did. BTW, there is an ominous rumor (rumor mind ya) that non-linear editing from NewTek is around the corner. NewTek is one hellava up and coming company. (I just wished that they'd buy out Commodore.) We need all kinds of computers, PCs, Mac and Amigas. But as far as video is concerned the Amiga is capturing a unique niche in the DTV market. Use you PCs for business that's where they really shine. Burning the Midnight Toast Patrick White
#71958From: Paul ToalJan 11, 1994 5:04 AM
Video Toaster is $1795 and it works in NTSC. The manual talks about VCRs that are not available in the United States. You still need $12,000 worth of VCR's so you're not looking at the whole package. Newtek is on their fourth revision, VM is a green 1.0. You'll be one of the few not using it on PAL so it might be a fun challenge. –Paul < Motorola Inside >
#71841From: David J. HillyerJan 9, 1994 2:39 PM
I'd say it depends on how much the video machine costs. The Toaster is the best bang for the buck that I've ever seen. -Dave