CompuServe Thread

#Hi-Res,24bit hard copy?

9 messages in this thread
#20235From: Kenneth L. KotzebueJul 29, 1992 1:01 PM
I have a need to produce high-resolution, 24-bit color still images, and am considering purchasing a software package such as 3D Studio to create a digital file and then use a service bureau to produce 35mm transparencies. One hang-up is that the digital file will be about 4MB in size. What is the best way to get this to a service bureau? Is there software available which will split the file into several parts so that floppies can be used? Can compression techniques such as JPEG be used to reduce the file size to 1.44 MB without seriously compromising quality? I would appreciate comments from anyone who has thoughts about this. Thanks, Ken
#20243From: PhilD [ADESK]Jul 29, 1992 1:38 PM
File compression is always an issue when you need to move large files around. Sometimes the service bureau can help out with suggestions. PKZIP is a standard utility for compressing files down. Then programs like FASTBACK, DOS's BACKUP, etc can cut a file up across multiple diskettes.
#20248From: Chris BarnesJul 29, 1992 4:04 PM
One option you might consider is a removable cartridge hard drive. They typically come in 40 or 80 Mb (drives and cartridges I believe, similar to the 7.2 vs. 1.4 Mb floppies). Many service bureaus have such drives available but of course you'd want to check with ones in your area. Don't have any experience with them yet, but I should be getting a Syquest 40Mb drive tomorrow or the next day for similar reasons.
#20282From: Mike MorrisonJul 30, 1992 9:36 AM
I usually use PKZip and then use ZIP2EXE to make it a self-extracting EXE file. But I think most service bureaus can PKUnzip a file. I have gotten as high as 97% compression on 24Bit uncompressed TIFs. -MM
#20295From: Kenneth L. KotzebueJul 30, 1992 1:00 PM
Thanks for your comments about using PKZIP. I have used this for standard data files, but assumed that it would not be effective for graphics after reading an article in PC Magazine on image compression (April 28, 1992, p.338) which states "Data-compression utilities … aren't very effective for full-color images.", and "the 2:1 ratio offered by lossless compression techniques just doesn't cut it when you need to … send even one such file down to a network printer." Any comments on the position presented in this article? KLK
#20334From: Graphics Software, Inc.Jul 30, 1992 6:14 PM
Kenneth, I just realized that in my last message I recommended a "type" backup. Of course I meant to say "tape" backup. I hate those tapos<g>. Dennis Bragg
#20351From: MARTIN G FOSTERJul 31, 1992 1:19 AM
Kenneth, I read somewhere that you can generally use JPEG to compress 8:1 without discernible (or displeasing artifacts). That should get many hi-res images down to manageable size (over several floppies). Right now I use just pkzip and then dos backup – many of the service bureaus near me have 40mb syquest cartridges which might be the way to go. I haven't done that because most of my stuff is broadcast animation and I don't know of a good compression method for that yet – JPEG does not work well with animations, only stills. Martin
#20434From: Ron Ruvalcava Jr.Jul 31, 1992 11:14 PM
I used to think lossy compression would not be an exceptable way of getting my files to a managable size, but I have since changed my mind. I once had the task of compressing four 13mb targa files for transport to a service bureau for slide processing(these are 4 views of the houses done by my co-workers and I at The Pyros Partnership which can be seen on the new 3D studio Siggraph demo tape). I used Image Alchemy, a wonderful command line file conversion program. I converted the files into the JPEG format and brought each one down to under an incredible 500k each. To make things simple I copied these to diskette and wrote a batch to copy and uncompress these images back to there size of approx. 50mb total. I tested my batch and printed these images on a Mitsubishi 300dpi dye-sub for comparison to the original file prints. I saw almost 0% loss of quality. Depending on the particular image being compressed the loss may be more apparent, I haven't had time to test files of that size since. But I've gained a new respect for JPEG and lossy compression.
#20291From: Graphics Software, Inc.Jul 30, 1992 12:05 PM
You may consider getting a type backup. We use a Colorado Memory Systems Jumbo 250 that cost about $350. We can get up to 250 MB of files on one tape. The tapes costs about $20 – $25 each. They use a pretty standardized format, so any service bureau should be able to read them. Much easier than copying 20 or so floppies. Dennis Bragg