CompuServe Thread

#Pixel 3D

19 messages in this thread
#37192From: Jim MccabeJan 3, 1994 9:54 PM
Jerry, I think you're right. But, all is not lost. They did throw in a T-shirt with the Pixel 3D software. If only they had included a few boxes of aspirin for the endless hours I'll be spending cleaning up the ragged logos.
#37219From: Richard BeausangJan 4, 1994 4:30 PM
James, Consider yourself lucky to even get ragged logos. PixelPro crashes most of the time on my machine. Blows my mind to read the glowing reviews it often gets. -Richard
#37245From: JERRY HATCHETTJan 5, 1994 1:19 AM
Richard, My thoughts exactly concerning the glowing reviews PixPro often receives. The sad fact is that I so seldom see a negative review about _anything_ that I've just about gotten to the point that I disregard all of them, beyond simple fact gathering about the specs and such… I guess the writers simply don't want to jeopardize the 'free software and heavily discounted hardware' arrangement, huh? Jerry
#37330From: Arnie CachelinJan 7, 1994 4:48 PM
Magazines don't usually like to run negative reviews on a product, if the thing sucked, they just wouldn't review it, or maybe it would go side-by-side and come out looking short in some checklist.
#37357From: JERRY HATCHETTJan 8, 1994 5:08 PM
Arnie, << Magazines don't usually like to run negative reviews on a product, if the thing sucked, they just wouldn't review it, or maybe it would go side-by-side and come out looking short in some checklist. >> I have no problem believing that they take that approach. However, if they've gone to the trouble to have it reviewd by one of their writers, and the writer concludes in his article that it's bad, they should publish it. This would be better for their readers, plus would probably inspire the manufacturer to correct the shortcomings and problems a whole lot quicker… Jerry
#37439From: Arnie CachelinJan 10, 1994 10:29 PM
Probably more likely is that the reviewer would tell the editor before he got too farr into the review, assuming it was that obviously sucky..
#37372From: Marlene Zenker/SYSOPJan 9, 1994 10:35 AM
In any of the reviews I've written (and I've written quite a few), if the product didn't make the grade, I reported it and the review was printed as is. That goes for Amazing Computing and AmigaWorld. Steve
#37404From: Richard BeausangJan 10, 1994 7:48 AM
Jerry, Mags don't want to rub their advertisers the wrong way. It's a shame Amiga users can't get better information about products before they buy since it is getting to be a luxury to actually see anything beforehand. That's one thing I like about the forums here, enduser reports. -Richard
#37425From: JERRY HATCHETTJan 10, 1994 5:35 PM
Richard, Agreed. Hanging out and participating on these forums is one way to get accurate information about the products we're looking at… Jerry
#37248From: John GrossJan 5, 1994 2:50 AM
Richard, I hope that you have talked to their tech support people about it crashing. I haven't had any problems with it crashing. JG
#37405From: Richard BeausangJan 10, 1994 7:48 AM
John, In all fairness, I haven't spoken to Pixel's tech support. I had kind of written it off. My progressive 040 eats some programs for lunch and this is one of them. I can get it to work less flakily if I drop down to the 030 and run enforcer. My Progressive accelerator is very intolerant of programs with enforcer hits and this program is full of them. -Richard
#37437From: Jim MccabeJan 10, 1994 10:04 PM
Richard, I've also got a Progressive 040 and have used Pixel Pro with no problems (nor with any other programs I've used). I wonder what's causing it ?
#37669From: Richard BeausangJan 16, 1994 3:59 AM
That's very interesting. Which Progressive 040 do you hve? -Richard
#37827From: Jim MccabeJan 21, 1994 8:30 PM
I'm not sure which Progressive 040 I have. It's fairly recent. I bought it just after the prices dropped.
#37876From: Richard BeausangJan 23, 1994 2:14 PM
I think the 040 for the 3000 with page mode ram chip is a little sensitive. Is this the one you have? -Richard
#37889From: Jim MccabeJan 23, 1994 8:12 PM
No, I've got the 040 for the A2000.
#38126From: Richard BeausangJan 30, 1994 1:08 AM
I kind of thought you had a different unit when you said everything worked fine. Most stuff runs fine, but programs that are full of enforcer hits usually freeze up the machine. I know they work O.K. on other machines even with the enforcer hits. -Richard
#37242From: James R. OllickJan 4, 1994 11:43 PM
If you use Imagine, get the 2.9 upgrade. It supports .PFB PS fonts. They import with absolutly no jaggies and can be beveled in many ways. Jim R. Ollick Using AP from Bergenfield, NJ
#37244From: JERRY HATCHETTJan 5, 1994 1:19 AM
James, You got a t-shirt with Pixel Pro?!?!? No fair. <g> Jerry