CompuServe Thread

#SVO-9600

16 messages in this thread
#54951From: Larry RaskAug 26, 1993 11:24 AM
The controller I recomend is any of the V-LAN compatible controllers. An Animax starts at a list of $1250.00. A V-LAN Express starts at a list of $750.00. I know the V-LAN works with the 9600 perfectly. It also works with the Videomedia Fast Pass option as well. This is similar to Quick Pass by DQ. I don't suggest other controllers because your limiting future growth for more money. Doesn't make sense. L.
#54979From: Michael E BartlettAug 26, 1993 2:39 PM
Sounds like V-LAN is where I should look. Thanks for the info. Michael B.
#55017From: Larry RaskAug 26, 1993 6:39 PM
Anytime. L.
#55032From: Angelo Guarino [DTI Inc]Aug 26, 1993 8:19 PM
Larry, >> Fast Pass option When did this come out? Is it extra or is it part of the driver set? Ang
#55048From: John TissavaryAug 26, 1993 10:29 PM
I was on the phone with Videomedia today, and Fast Pass is not out for the PC yet, only Mac (Grrrrrhg!). The person I spoke with stated it was against company policy to talk about stuff that wasn't there yet. Sounds familiar, huh <g>? The Mac version goes for @ $1000, I think. John Tissavary (La Luna cie)
#55195From: Angelo Guarino [DTI Inc]Aug 28, 1993 8:40 AM
John >> MAC version only So there's nothing new there … Diaquest has had that capability for some time on the MAC side. Ang
#55253From: John TissavaryAug 28, 1993 3:47 PM
Nothing new at all, unfortunately. Diaquest has been promising Quickpass for PC's for some time now, and a lot of people are axiously awaiting it (and rightly so). Me, I'm about to go the V-LAN route, unless someone does a good job convincing me why the 'controller' way would be better than V-LAN. Larry Rask said the V-LAN version of Quickpass (I can't remember its name) will be out sometime this winter. Regards, John Tissavary (La Luna cie)
#55309From: Angelo Guarino [DTI Inc]Aug 29, 1993 11:45 AM
John, >> goi'g V-LAN route I think that's a good descission _especially_ if you have any intent at all to do video editing as well in the future. Their Windows based editing software is supposed to be nice. Ang
#55413From: John TissavaryAug 30, 1993 4:10 AM
Thanks for the reply. It's always kind of scary for me to venture into unknown hardware territory. I always appreciate someone jumping in and giving me their opinion. I saw a coupon in Desktop Vidow World for a free demo version of OZ that was supposedly fully functional. I would send away for it, but I'll only have one deck for the time being. John Tissavary (La Luna cie) PS: Can't wait for Fast Pass (either it's the name for V-LAN's quickpass or it's the name for our bus passes here in San Francisco <g>), should be out for the PC sometime before '94.
#55458From: Angelo Guarino [DTI Inc]Aug 30, 1993 11:50 AM
JT I would go for thee Oz anyway .. atleast with the transmitter installed .. you could play with the interface and see what'll do Ang
#55493From: John TissavaryAug 30, 1993 3:31 PM
Yeah, I was thinking it would be worth it. I could always rent another deck to see if I would want to do post myself sometimes. Regards, John Tissavary (La Luna cie)
#55534From: Bailey BrownAug 30, 1993 7:48 PM
John, What is "Fast Pass"? Is it some sort of way to speed-up or eliminate pre-roll? Bailey
#55584From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 31, 1993 2:10 AM
Bailey, >> What is "Fast Pass"? Is it some sort of way to speed-up or eliminate pre-roll? >> PMJI, I think it's an American football term. Also common in rugby <g,d&r>. Actually, it's also a trade name for the method of laying more than one frame per preroll/edit/postroll/rewind sequence. You don't eliminate preroll you just do less of them. In the "quickpass" incarnation, you do a pre layoff test over a sampling of frames where the software checks how fast your hardisk/framebuffer combo loads a frame from your sequence. Say it takes 3 seconds for the longest. The software then calculates multiple locations where it can do an edit, in this case every 3 seconds = 90 frames. In a 900 frame sequence (0 to 899) you could get 10 (or 11) edits per pass. First pass frames might be: 0,89,179,269,359…899. The next pass would involve a rewind and preroll and another 10 frames layed (1,90,180…810). This is obviously a very efficient way of doing frame-by-frame layoff, _if_ you have a fast hardisk _and_, especially, a long sequence to layoff.
#55100From: Larry RaskAug 27, 1993 10:40 AM
It is only on the MAC now in a seperate App. It will be available on the PC soon. We not sure whether it will be Windows / DOS first. Probably somewhere around 4th quarter. It will also be a seperate app. L.
#55198From: Angelo Guarino [DTI Inc]Aug 28, 1993 8:40 AM
Larry, Sounds good. When you have a good beta and a projected ship date, geet me a copy for review and we'll put it in the newsletter. Ang
#55441From: Larry RaskAug 30, 1993 10:40 AM
Great. I'll let you know when we're ready. L.