CompuServe Thread

#What is MUI?

50 messages in this thread
#157822From: daniel wolfJul 29, 1994 3:32 AM
What is an MUI? I've seen Fractint on the PC machines – lots of formulae (FractalPro has 10 for now, but maybe more in the future) but SLOWWWWWWWWW…. generating the images! FractalPro is 100% assembly language and optimized for math chips and 040 systems so it goes very fast compared to just about any Fractal program I've ever seen on any system. It doesn't take shortcuts with image quality to 'fake' fast rendering, either. For fast exploration, users of FractalPro can simply use the 320×200 resolution and then switch to, say, 768×480 for video quality output of selected images or animation sequences. For those animation modes for which it is possible, FractalPro does use the Amiga blitter chip to simply move most of the image and just fill in a narrow strip to create the next image in a sequence (most panning modes work this way). When doing a 'left' motion pan, for example, FractalPro can generate a series of up to hundreds of images per hour – and it even handles the elimination of HAM streaks correctly when doing so. FractalPro does have a full GUI (lots of buttons to click on, PLUS menu items with keyboard shortcuts for the buttons, PLUS ARexx complete control over all functions) – basically a 3-way interface
#157927From: Michael SheaJul 30, 1994 2:07 AM
MUI is the Magic User Interface shareware distribution. It contains a library and a group of images for constructing GUI's. A lot of shareware out of Germany is being program using MUI. The Fractint Amiga port has a MUI interface. A medium size window appears on the Workbench with a number of gadgets to control Fractint. I have played with fractint on the PC and did not like the interface. The Amiga version is much nicer to use. Another MUI application I have looked at is WinGnuPlot, a version of GnuPlot with an MUI interface. Also to new beta version on SpecialHost from the PasTeX distribution and a program I just downloaded called DFA (a nice address manager) have MUI interfaces. On Amiga fractint, I have done some speed comparisons with other Mandelbrot generators. For the Mandelbrot set itself, fractint is faster than MandelPaug, but not as fast as the demo version of Mand2000. I like fractint because of wide variety of fractal types. I am attending graduate school in mathematics and am developing an interest in non-linear dynamics, chaos, fractal and complexity. One thing I wish fractint could do is animations and I wish it had an ARexx interface. ._ _ _ INTERNET: mshea@math.arizona.edu | | |ichael _>hea COMPUSERVE: 76665,3360
#157995From: Steve AhlstromJul 30, 1994 5:21 PM
Michael, Just testing the waters … I've considered doing an MUI version of AutoPilot. Because it would require an almost complete rewrite it would not be a free update but probably in the $30 range to registered users. Should I bother? -sja
#158001From: John LeonardJul 30, 1994 7:07 PM
Yes Please bother MUI is excellent! Thanks. John A. On AutoPilot all the way from the U.K.
#158011From: Dale LarsonJul 30, 1994 9:45 PM
I'm not sure what it would buy. I use MUI with Mosaic, and it doesn't bother me (as it does some people), but I also don't see how having an MUI version of a program that already works with gadtools would be all *that* much of a plus. Maybe things would be easily configurable enough that I'd be able to get the niggly things adjusted right on a Moniterm. I guess that alone might make it worth while. Dale L. Larson Intangible Assets Manufacturing (info@iam.com) "That's the best part about being crazy. You see things no one else can see."
#158025From: Michael SheaJul 30, 1994 11:49 PM
Steve, I think I am in agreement with Dale on this. I don't see where doing a rewrite solely for the sake of MUI support would be that useful, as AP already has a nice GUI. I also think I would resent paying for such an upgrade, if for instance because at some point due to a CI$ software change an upgrade would be required. Perhaps if a major rewrite of AP were needed for some other reason, then would be a good time to provide MUI support. Take the above paragraph with the following grain of salt. I have not played arround much with the MUI prefs program to customize my MUI applications, so I don't really know how important that might be. For my upcoming Mathematical Software course programs, I am real interested in using MUI, but have not really decided yet. ._ _ _ INTERNET: mshea@math.arizona.edu | | |ichael _>hea COMPUSERVE: 76665,3360
#158030From: Steve AhlstromJul 31, 1994 12:12 AM
>>resent paying for such an upgrade Interesting. What other piece of software do you own that has had 7 major updates and 10 minor updates in a 20 month period for no additional cost?
#158067From: Michael SheaJul 31, 1994 3:37 PM
Steve, Past upgrades have provided important improvements to AP, and I would have gladly paid for them. That I did not need to of course made me happy. The point I was trying to make is I don't think an MUI version, in and of itself, would be of any advantage to the user, so paying $30.00 for it would be hard to swallow. If in addition there were some other major features added, I would have less of a problem with it. I do not mean to imply that your support for AP has been less than exemplary. ._ _ _ INTERNET: mshea@math.arizona.edu | | |ichael _>hea COMPUSERVE: 76665,3360
#158079From: Jim SakladJul 31, 1994 4:44 PM
Steve – > I've considered doing an MUI version of AutoPilot. How would it look and/or work differently? $30 does not seem unreasonable to me; the regular updates could reasonably be felt to obligate users to an occasional increment…. . . . . JimDoc, on AutoPilot
#158083From: Steve AhlstromJul 31, 1994 4:55 PM
Jim, How would it work or look differently? Well, you'd need to look at some MUI applications and/or the example programs within the user archive of the MUI distribution. It is basically a system of boopsi gadgets and images that allows for resolution and font independence, user control of the gadget imagery. It is a very powerful GUI in terms of user configuration and from the programming side allows much more latitude than gadtools allows.
#158109From: Jim SakladJul 31, 1994 10:20 PM
Steve – Thanks for the MUI info. I WOULD pay for it! . . . . JimDoc, on AutoPilot
#158093From: Steve SetzerJul 31, 1994 6:20 PM
Steve, I use MUI and would consider a MUI version of AP. (I like the look of MUI) …Steve Cruising on Autopilot from beautiful Coastal South Carolina
#158147From: Ed VishootAug 1, 1994 7:33 AM
Steve, I can't provide any substantive feedback on an MUI version of AutoPilot (or any program for that matter) because I haven't 'played' with MUI, but you have managed to peak my curiousity about it! What are your impressions of this MUI? Does it slow down system response in any way? Has it been stable and does it completely cooperate with non-MUI applications? What advantages do you personally see it offers? Is it worth the extra disk space it is going to consume? Is it worth the registration fee? Sorry about all the questions, but I am curious! EdV
#158202From: Steve AhlstromAug 1, 1994 9:17 PM
Ed, MUI is (basically) a runtime library, similar to gadtools.library, that supports a wide variety of boopsi gadgets. It is similar to what Commodore stated they were working towards when they dropped the ball and said (in effect) that gadtools was good enough (it is not even close). There is no such thing as "completely cooperate with non-MUI applications". It's a shared, runtime library. If you are interested in MUI, and a LOT of new applications are being written that use it, download it from AmigaTech, Library 13, and decide for yourself. -sja
#158158From: Wayne SteeleAug 1, 1994 11:33 AM
I'd buy it.
#158894From: BOB TREMBLERAug 7, 1994 7:09 PM
Yes, I'd like to see a MUI version, you do good work, I use AP evry day, much of time to gather NON Amiga stuff that I need for work. I think AP is much better than similar programs on the PC. Keep up the good work ! Bob T.
#158896From: Steve AhlstromAug 7, 1994 7:36 PM
Bob, Thanks!
#158133From: daniel wolfAug 1, 1994 2:59 AM
AHA, my friend. If it is fractal animation and ARexx control you want, then FractalPro will be precisely your cup of tea! Not to mention, a true Amiga Intuition gadget/menu interface. I'd definitely like to see MUI and how it's used, out of general interest. I'll continue doing my interfaces in hard code (assembler) tho. The demo version of Mand2000 MAY not be a fair comparison unless you specifically set M2000 for 'max' accuracy and same 'count/dwell' values. My reaction to Mand2000 demo was (and I know this comes from a competitor) not all that positive. It was very easy to get very bad pictures out of it (bizarrely incorrect aspect ratios) and the zooming animation is 'optical' and unsuitable for professional video. Perhaps I missed something and am mistaken. The demo also shot so many interruption messages at me I completely gave up doing my usual apples to apples speed comparison against my benchmark NiceM2 image. As with some other M programs, it requires FOUR coordinate values instead of the minimal 3 and I couldn't type 'em all in without getting interrupted dozens of times by their promotional messages. I have a demo of FractalPro 4 up on this forum with no such interruptions for those who'd like to see it. It is NOT FractalPro 6, for sure, but it does work to show basically what FractalPro is about. FP4 lacks the GUI, ARexx, 24-bit, and is integer only (no FPU required). I disabled some aspects for the demo, but you can play around quite a bit nevertheless. When I set M2000 demo for max accuracy it seemed similar in speed to FP, but I couldn't tell. If you can get M2000 to run the NiceM2 picture (a fair benchmark with very little 'black' area) let me know. Pics with lots of 'black' area give some programs an advantage as some programs have a special mechanism which speeds up the 'black' areas (inside the M set) but that same mechanism ADDS overhead cost to the more interesting pics which really DON'T have much 'black' area anyway. I found it counterproductive to 'watch' for black areas to speed up just those areas. And FP's calculations are ALWAYS at 'max' accuracy. For exploring quickly, just use the 320×200 resolution … simple. And M2000 has, I believe, quite a bit fewer 'formulae' to choose from than FP6. I am also about to add two SPECTACULAR new coloring options to FP. Testing about completed and they are terrific – and not available in M2000 to the best of my knowledge. Also just shaved another couple percent off the calculation times. M2000 does look very fast at first but I'm definitely interested in a true apples to apples comparison on a deeply zoomed image with no 'black' – that's where most of the time lies when doing an animation sequence anyway.
#158636From: Ron LegroAug 5, 1994 6:53 PM
MUI (Magic User Interface) is astonishingly good and makes any application on the Amiga look better. It's a shared runtime library that provides "look and feel" improvements to the Workbench, and makes any application using the library universally adjustable in preferences. Also, treats any compliant application as a commodity. Very slick; sort of like X-Windows; workstation quality. Runs perfectly on my A2000 with KS/WB 2.1 and Magic Workbench. From Germany; a lot of MUI-compliant applications are now showing up.
#158708From: Andrew LetchfordAug 6, 1994 7:50 AM
Ron, Butting in here. I have an Amiga 4000-030 running WB3. I have seen much talk of this MUI software. How do I get hold of it. Is it in the libraries here or do I get it from Germany? What do I need to run it? -=<<<<<< Delivered by Co-Pilot v. 1.4 >>>>>>===-Andrew Letchford=–=UK=-
#158728From: Ronald B. RomineAug 6, 1994 11:32 AM
The MUI system files can be fould in the AmigaTECH forum. There are two archives, one for users, and one for developpers. The user's version is in LIB 13 (Libraries), is file "MUIUSR.LHA). If your a developper, there is another file called "MUIDEV.LHA" in LIB 11, which aides in writing programs that use MUI. Ron. – ("I'm not stupid, I'm not expendable, and I'm not going!" – quote made by any low level RPG player.)
#158892From: daniel wolfAug 7, 1994 7:02 PM
I'll have to ask for MUI on our next Amiga Club disk!
#157934From: Brian BartlettJul 30, 1994 3:48 AM
Daniel, MUI is the Magic User Interface, as I recall it although I could be wrong. It is a shared library set up to ease coding the user interface. Supposedly it works on all Amigas, although I can't vouch for that, as it dies a horrible guru death everytime I try to run it here. The Four Seasons of Southern California: Fire, Flood, Earthquake, and Riot.
#157969From: Michael SheaJul 30, 1994 12:51 PM
Brian, What kind of Amiga/OS do you use. I have been using it on a A2000/030 with WB2.1 and have had no problems. Which MUI applications have you had trouble with. Your's is the first GURU complaint I have heard about MUI. I am taking a graduate course in Mathmatical Software this sememster and will be programming some graphing programs on the Amiga. I am considering using MUI, so I am interested in it's stability. ._ _ _ INTERNET: mshea@math.arizona.edu | | |ichael _>hea COMPUSERVE: 76665,3360
#158037From: Brian BartlettJul 31, 1994 3:01 AM
Michael, the same installation as you have, although I am running a GVP A3001 board, Retina, and Bridgeboard as well. I'm not certain, but one of the three, probably the Retina may be choking it. It is very strange. With MUI loaded, the system locks up during the bootup sequence. The Four Seasons of Southern California: Fire, Flood, Earthquake, and Riot.
#158102From: Michael SheaJul 31, 1994 9:27 PM
I have a GVP3001 and a Bridgeboard myself, but not a Retina. I don't know if it could be the trouble or not. ._ _ _ INTERNET: mshea@math.arizona.edu | | |ichael _>hea COMPUSERVE: 76665,3360
#158285From: Brian BartlettAug 2, 1994 1:38 PM
Michael, as a followup, I downloaded MUI 2.1 from AmigaTech. I don't know why, but the guru has failed to visit this time. I don't know what he did to fix it, but so far it is stable. I'll give it a week, but it looks promising already. Gorgeous is the operative word here. If it lives, I'll register. Perhaps we should have word with him about adding his programs to the list in SWREG. The Four Seasons of Southern California: Fire, Flood, Earthquake, and Riot.
#158296From: Steve AhlstromAug 2, 1994 3:19 PM
Brian, I've already been in contact with him about SWREG. You might drop him an email to "help him along", his address is stuntz@informatik.tu-muenchen.de -sja
#158469From: Brian BartlettAug 4, 1994 12:37 AM
Steve, roger that. I will. The Four Seasons of Southern California: Fire, Flood, Earthquake, and Riot.
#158304From: Michael SheaAug 2, 1994 4:36 PM
Brian, I am glad you got MUI 2.1 to work. The more I use MUI the more I like and I think I will use it in my upcoming project. ._ _ _ INTERNET: mshea@math.arizona.edu | | |ichael _>hea COMPUSERVE: 76665,3360
#158468From: Brian BartlettAug 4, 1994 12:37 AM
Michael, so am I. A similiar thought, project-wise, also occured to me. Something like this would ease the coding of the user interface to a stand-alone program I have in mind to do, soon. The Four Seasons of Southern California: Fire, Flood, Earthquake, and Riot.
#158430From: Steve SetzerAug 3, 1994 4:25 PM
Brian, For an MUI application try AVM. It is a voice mail package for Rockwell chipset modems. This program is absolutely awesome, I have been playing with it for a couple of days and it is unbelievable the multitude of things it can do! AVM is in the libs here (should be in communications). …Steve Cruising on Autopilot from beautiful Coastal South Carolina
#158479From: Brian BartlettAug 4, 1994 2:08 AM
Steve, I don't know what the SupraFAXModem has. But voice mail is one of those niches that I'll never need, for a good long time. Talk to me in another six years. _Then_ I'll have a use for it. The Four Seasons of Southern California: Fire, Flood, Earthquake, and Riot.
#158639From: Steve SetzerAug 5, 1994 7:04 PM
Well, I do have a limited use for Voicemail, but have been playing with it on my esidential phone line until I get the kinks worked out (er I uinderstand completely how to set it up <g>), then plan to set it up for the business line. It will sort and route voice calls for me or my son, faxes to GPFax, or data, I can prerecord (thru the phone, digitizer or IFF) a message for it to call at a specific time when I am not home. It will also allow someone with the proper access code to have AVM page me immediately after they hang up in case of emergency. It is really cool stuff just to knock around with! …Steve Cruising on Autopilot from beautiful Coastal South Carolina
#158805From: Brian BartlettAug 7, 1994 3:23 AM
Steve, agreed! This is one example of offloading some of the routine daily procedures off to these sweet, little microprocessors. Almost as if you had obtained a secretary with only a slight capital expenditure and no wages. However, at this time, it's useless here. Not the fault of the machine, but of my particular lifestyle (I'm beginning to hate that word ;-). A student, soon to be a grad-student, with no life to speak of <g>. The Four Seasons of Southern California: Fire, Flood, Earthquake, and Riot.
#158828From: Rafael VicariaAug 7, 1994 6:41 AM
I'm wondering if I can do all that in Germany. It sounds great! Rafa <Motorola Inside> …via AutoPilot 1.72 from Berlin
#158674From: Zeddock MillerAug 5, 1994 10:29 PM
I wanted to see that program (avm) and DLed MUI to use it, but when I try to use it, it switches to another display type that my monitor wont display. I can't find anyway to keep this from happening. (the screen switch) Does MUI have to change screen modes? Can I defeat that to try the program or is it's beauty only found in a different screen mode? PS I'm sure you'll ask so… I have an old SONY 1302 Trinitron FinePitch. Says it's MULTISYNC but I have not been able to use it with the better screen modes. I just stay in the HIRES interlace. Thanx, in advance, Zeddock
#158729From: Ronald B. RomineAug 6, 1994 11:32 AM
I'm assuming that you have either a A4000 or A1200. MUI shouldn't change a program's screenmode. Do you have the Mode Promotion option selected in the IControl Pref? Do you have the DblPAL, & DblNTSC monitor drivers in the DEVS:Monitors drawer? Programs select there own screenmode, but under AmigDOS 3.0, you can intercept the programs request for most screenmodes, and substitute a version with a higher sync (PAL to DblPAL, NTSC to DblNTSC). There is a mode promotion program called "PPREFS.LHA" in LIB 3 (Screen Utilities). It works better than Commodore's built-im promotion software, and allows more modes to be promoted. Also, if your Sony 1302 can't handle the DblNTSC, DblPAL, or Multiscan modes as is, try placing the VGA-ONLY file in the DEVS:Monitors drawer. This file modifies the ~27-kHz drivers into ~29-kHz drivers for better VGA compatiblity. Ron. – ("I'm not stupid, I'm not expendable, and I'm not going!" – quote made by any low level RPG player.)
#158821From: Steve SetzerAug 7, 1994 4:32 AM
Zeddock Are you using any video boards? I run everything in standard Hi-Rez Interlace in a 030 2000, with flicker fixer. I do not believe MUI does anything with screens. I can't run it right now to check, but if you haven't gotten it by Monday remind me and I will check how mine is set up. Hard drive crash last nite, and that was one of the damaged files 🙁 Just have to reinstall it. AVM is cool! I see a lot of power there, and seemingly well done. I have just started playing with it, docs aren't that clear, so a lot of trial and error! Cruising on Autopilot from beautiful Coastal South Carolina
#158637From: Ron LegroAug 5, 1994 6:53 PM
Brian, just to interject that I registered MUI the old-fashioned way, then registered MagicWB using SWREG. SWREG is outstanding; if we Amigans had had something like it long ago, our computer platform might be in better shape today. Hope the MUI author joins up.
#158642From: Steve AhlstromAug 5, 1994 7:40 PM
Ron, Unless you know something I don't you couldn't have registered MagicWB via SWREG. Only 3 Amiga programs show up in SWREG with a keyword search of Amiga. SWREG has been available for over 2.5 years.
#158680From: Trent HawkinsAug 6, 1994 12:03 AM
Steve, Which three programs are they? (other than Autopilot of course..) Trent One of the "Frozen Chosen"
#158684From: Steve AhlstromAug 6, 1994 12:43 AM
A video tape and a video disk database program.
#158679From: Trent HawkinsAug 6, 1994 12:03 AM
Ron, MagicWB is now SWREG? Which version? Trent One of the "Frozen Chosen"
#158803From: Brian BartlettAug 7, 1994 3:22 AM
Ron, I must of missed something in the docs. What was the registration number to use for MagicWB? The Four Seasons of Southern California: Fire, Flood, Earthquake, and Riot.
#158829From: Rafael VicariaAug 7, 1994 6:41 AM
I enthusiastically support your suggestion. With GPFax too. And so many more. Rafa <Motorola Inside> …via AutoPilot 1.72 from Berlin
#158134From: daniel wolfAug 1, 1994 3:00 AM
I'm interested in seeing MUI. Also, I should have asked Michael Shea, but I'm also interested in seeing the Amiga version of Fractint with the MUI (more for fractint itself, actually, as I've seen it on PC's – and I'm always interested in other folks' fractal programs). Thank you.
#158203From: Steve AhlstromAug 1, 1994 9:17 PM
Fractint is in AmigaArts Forum (GO AMIGAA) -sja
#158634From: Ron LegroAug 5, 1994 6:53 PM
Daniel: In your biased opinion, how does Mand2000 for the Amiga stack up with FractalPro? If you've seen it, of course. [a few messages later on….] Whoops, see you responded to another query on this. I went ahead (before knowing of FractalPro) and bought a registered copy of Mand2000. I'm happy with it. The demo and the real program are not the same. The demo indeed spits messages at you. Anyway, at $35, it seems like a reasonable deal to me, for my amateur and occasional use.
#158891From: daniel wolfAug 7, 1994 7:01 PM
IMHO, FractalPro BLOWS Mand2000 away. If you want great images, LOTS of options, professional video quality, etc. FractalPro is the way to go. Nice GUI, too. Have to admit, for 'casual' use, M2000 at $35 is not bad – just not in the same league as FPro.