CompuServe Thread

#Who owns DEC Alpha's?

13 messages in this thread
#185592From: Dennis FenskeAug 17, 1995 9:24 AM
Can we have a poll of: 1. Who already owns DEC Alpha's. 2. How many do you own. 3. Who would purchase one if MAX would take advantage of it's power? 4. How many would you purchase? I have been considering the option for a few months, and was hoping to be able to make a decision after SIGGRAPH, and before the end of August. But if MAX won't work with it, my purchase must wait. I will volunteer to compile the list if people send responses (either public or private). Everyone sending me Email would remain nameless. The list would be 1. Already own DEC Alpha systems = xxx. 2. Would like to purchase DEC Alpha systems, but waiting on MAX = xxx. Thanks, Dennis
#185637From: BRENDAN WILLIAMSAug 17, 1995 1:34 PM
Dennis, I would like to use Dec Alpha, but of course must wait and see if Max will be able to run on it. Regards Brendan
#185725From: Yost GroupAug 17, 1995 10:42 PM
Check out my msg 185717. Beyond that, there's not much I can say. – G
#185748From: Robert C. RitgerAug 17, 1995 11:54 PM
Dennis: 1. My company owns a few DEC Alpha machines. 2. 15 3. Absolutely 4. I may try to get the Raptor as a workhorse renderer. FWIW, not all DEC Alpha boxes will run NT. – Bob Ritger
#185831From: Steve OrmondeAug 18, 1995 10:38 AM
Dennis, From what I heard at Siggraph, the DEC alpha is somewhere between 4 and 6 times faster than a P5-90 and costs about $16K. So, if this is true and assuming that Max will take advantage of it, it will become our standard workstation. (ie, one vote for DEC Alpha) On the other hand, I don't know what other platforms are available to NT. There may be some faster the the Alpha. Bottom line is: whatever hardware adesk decides to support, we will purchase the fastest per dollar. Now we just need to wait for the list. Our company is expanding rapidly and we purchase a new seat every 2-3 months so it is _extremely_ important we know asap. – Steve Ormonde
#185845From: Dennis FenskeAug 18, 1995 11:41 AM
For the poll on DEC Alpha's so far this date 8/18/95 in the AM. 1. Already own DEC Alpha systems = 15. 2. Would like to purchase DEC Alpha systems, but waiting on MAX = 3. It appears from a post from Gary Yost that the DEC Alpha is currently being used to compile and test "MAX" code. See message #185717. If people continue to post owning or wanting DEC Alpha's to run MAX, I will continue to update the list. Dennis
#186212From: Tom Lansford [ARTIST]Aug 21, 1995 4:17 AM
Hi Dennis, Sorry to ask this of you, but message 185717 has already been deleted from my message archives in ozcis. Can you post the relevent portion of the message for me. Thanks! 🙂 Tom
#186231From: Dennis FenskeAug 21, 1995 7:57 AM
Tom; >> Sorry to ask this of you, but message 185717 has already been deleted >> from my message archives in ozcis. Can you post the relevent portion of >> the message for me. This is the complete message. >> As Jonas said, Intel is the only _announced_ platform at this time. But >> suffice to say that we're constantly compiling our code on an Alpha (that >> just happens to be sitting in the office) to make sure that everything we >> do runs fine on that platform as well. >> – G Dennis
#186242From: Tom Lansford [ARTIST]Aug 21, 1995 9:39 AM
Thanks Dennis! Tom
#185851From: Tyler ColwellAug 18, 1995 12:25 PM
I have a DEC xl590 that I would upgrade to an alpha station (daughter card swap) if and when Max/Alpha is announced.
#185909From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 18, 1995 5:35 PM
Dennis, >> 3. Who would purchase one if MAX would take advantage of it's power? << Don't have any now, but will consider them versus Intel's P6 (multi-proc). >> 4. How many would you purchase? << I'm interested in a multi-processor, alpha server, for a render server. Probably a 4 cpu 300mhz jobby, with 1gb RAM.
#186888From: Philip AroAug 23, 1995 4:02 PM
Martin I am interested in buying a mulit-processor Alpha system too, for the same use (render server for Max). But the DEC 4 banger seems a little un-economic. At that point, why not just get the Onyx running Softimage? Plus- 1 gb RAM? Why not 48 (or 64) X 4? (Or was this a bit of ha-ha?) Phil Aro Terre Papier
#186908From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 23, 1995 6:11 PM
Philip, >> But the DEC 4 banger seems a little un-economic. At that point, why not just get the Onyx running Softimage? << I disagree. The DEC alphaserver will actually be much more economical (and faster) than SGI's for a fraction of the price. I figured an alphaserver 4 x 300mhz would be faster than our Challenge XL (8 x r4400 200mhz) for a quarter of the price. Make sense? Also, I think MAX will be better than Softimage (which I've used) also at a fraction of the price, especially considering all the development that will occur for MAX – the sky's the limit. Martin