CompuServe Thread

#Micropolis A/V HDs

3 messages in this thread
#119703From: Greg K. WelchAug 21, 1995 9:04 AM
"I hope NT can get out the bugs for -both- modes.." Me too! I plan on using HQ5 also, on short projects or when I get a terobyte drive. Greg
#119720From: RAD Moose @ NewTek, Inc.Aug 21, 1995 11:38 AM
The fact that some video looks fine in HQ5 but looks softer, noisier, etc. in standard mode is not a bug. Same with EP. In any video compression system, the more compression that is applied the more detail is lost and the more artifacting that occurs. Standard mode builds all video to an expected drive speed of 3.7M/sec; depending on the detail in the video and the change from frame to frame, quality will vary from "D2" to the maximum compression that EP applies, and the quality degradation will look similar to the loss in detail and sharpness and increase in noise that stepping down through various tape formats produces. EP goes straight for maximum compression on all frames. Do you expect a long-play mode VHS recording to look the same as a broadcast D2 recording? HQ5 assumes a drive speed of 4.8M/sec, and at that speed only in very rare instances would there be a need to jump to a higher compression level to meet playback speed requirements, so video quality is pretty much fully preserved. You might want to review the Pre-CO questions, posted in the NewTek library, for further discussion. Chuck.
#119808From: Greg K. WelchAug 22, 1995 8:52 AM
Chuck, I thought our bug discussion was referring to stuttering drive performance in HQ. I'm pretty satisfied with the quality/capacity trade-off at standard mode. I had been responding to a question on my Microp NON-AV HD performance in standard mode and simply responded that I too would like to see any bugs (which we really meant as insufficient HD performance) to be cleared up. I guess bug is getting a bit overused here. Greg