CompuServe Thread

#PAR drive prob, WFW 3.11

23 messages in this thread
#185924From: Lyle RainsAug 18, 1995 7:23 PM
When I try to access a PAR drive in Windows for Workgroups 3.11, File Manager and file requesters show a drive which is a clone of my boot drive rather than the contents of the PAR drive. System is a Pentium 133 with MSDOS 6.22, WFW 3.11, 386MAX 6.0 as memory manager. I think I previously read of this problem, as well as its solution, but I can't find the fix anywhere I have looked. Can anyone help me out?
#185961From: Scott TherriaultAug 19, 1995 7:10 AM
Lyle, I just got a used PAR last week and have been trying to memorize the owner's manual for the PAR and for RAZOR, this is what the RAZOR manual says: "…In order to resolve the conflict, turn 32 bit file access off." (Control Panel, 386 Enhanced, Virtual Memory) Scott
#186008From: Lyle RainsAug 19, 1995 2:13 PM
Thanks. The PAR drives don't show 32-bit file access enabled. Does this mean I have to turn off 32-bit file access for all drives? I hope not, but i'll give it a try and see what happens. Thanks for the pointer to the Razor Pro manula. I knew I had read this before, but didn't think to look there!
#186002From: James Coulter[Mindscape]Aug 19, 1995 1:47 PM
Personally, I wouldn't trust the data integrity of file ops from the Windows File Manager on the PAR. The PAR is really doing some backflips to fool DOS into seeing a DOS drive. I'd stick with PAR.EXE for file management, even if you do get the File Mangler to recognize it. 😉 — James — Choreo Motion —
#186007From: Lyle RainsAug 19, 1995 2:07 PM
I want to be able to use Razor Pro with it and use the windows PAR player, so it would be nice to get it working. I have a new problem. I downloaded the latest version of the PAR utils from their FTP site, and now, each time I exit the PAR.EXE control program, my computer freezes. This is version 1.51 of the PAR utils for DOS. Anyone else having a similar problem? Could it be a conflict between Pharlap DOS extender and 386MAX?
#186092From: James Coulter[Mindscape]Aug 20, 1995 2:04 AM
Hmm. I'm still using 1.50 and I haven't had any problems with it. Have you tried the ol' clean-boot routine? — James — Choreo Motion —
#186040From: Mike MorganAug 19, 1995 5:29 PM
Lyle, There are a couple of things you might try, if you can see the PAR drive in DOS o.k. and the problem shows up in Windows only, you need to turn the 32 Bit File Access to OFF in the Control Panel under Enhanced 386 Virtual Memory settings. If the directory of the PAR drive shows incorrectly in both DOS and Windows, make sure that you are running the latest version (ver 1.5) of the PAR software and you also might try adding the DOS Substitute Command (i.e. C:\temp D:\) in your Autoexec.bat file prior to your PAR settings. This will move you PAR drive to another Drive letter, the PAR will use the next sequential drive available. -Mike
#186048From: Lyle RainsAug 19, 1995 7:03 PM
When I turned off 32-bit file access, things started working as expected. Thanks. As I stated in another message, my new problem is a machine freeze when I exit PAR.EXE in DOS. Also, I get a memory protect violation if I try PAR.EXE from a DOS window in Windows. The Windows recorder is handy – grabs both video and audio at once! Once I get the kinks worked out, I think I'm gonna LOVE it!
#186054From: Mike MorganAug 19, 1995 8:33 PM
Lyle, I went back and read the message from James and his statement "I wouldn't trust the data integrity of file ops from the Windows File Manager on the PAR" holds true even if you are using RP or that other program. I would only access the drives from RP and in DOS (using the copy command only, with out wild cards) & the PAR application if you want to keep your data intact. I also have had good luck with back-up programs in DOS and Windows directly from the PAR using DPS PAR 1.5x software. As for the following, you are playing with fire. I have never tried this myself, there is no reason to run PAR.EXE from Windows when you have RP anyway. >> I get a memory protect violation if I try PAR.EXE from a DOS window in Windows << Also another rule of thumb, do not run PAR.EXE before you use RP I have heard of problems here also, in other words, make sure you have not loaded PAR before you go into WIN. I would make a copy of your boot files (i.e. config.sys, autoexec.bat) start with a basic boot structure and see if your problems still exist with the lock-up. You will not need a memory manager to run the PAR from DOS. BTW- Those DPS PAR MCI drivers are great, sound adds life to video. -Mike
#186078From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 20, 1995 12:50 AM
Mike, PMJI, but do you use Razor Pro for NT? If so, I was wondering if you think it could be used for editting film rez work (2048×1536)? Does it have features like film speed playback, motion blur, wire removal, excellent chromakeying for bluescreen compositing etc? Also, does it support 10 bit log or 12-14 bit per pixel file formats (like .rla) suitable for film work. I would imagine one could work at video rez for previews and then do final compositing at film rez. Martin
#186106From: Mike MorganAug 20, 1995 10:56 AM
Martin, Have things settled down at MetroLight? I read about your hard drive problems :(, you know Alan was down for a few days with a bad 4 gig drive, but I think it was a Micropolis, I hope the wind is not blowing in my direction.<g> There is no good time do have problems but if your in between jobs I guess that would be the best time. Anyway Speed Razor Mach III is still in the beta stages, soon to be released. Here are some answers to your questions. -Razor supports just about any final output size, I think it would be controlled by your amount of RAM, I will check on this for you. The other thing is you will need to import and do your final output in TGA files (that is a lot of hard disk space, you will need a few of those big Segates). -Film speed playback can be adjusted on a single ani file but I am not sure how you would control it on a set of TGA's, you could set the Finial Output Setting to any speed that you want. -Razor has some of the best chromakeying for bluescreen compositing on the market from the reports I get from in:sync. -I need to check on the file formats, but I think right now TGA would be the closest. -There is no motion blur or wire removal at this time. -If you are working with single TGA's the render speed is directly affected by the file size, so if you wanted to work in video rez Razor would have to sample the film rez files down and I think this would take more time but you could render to the PVR and have a way to do a playback at video rez. Jamie has been on the road and can cover these questions in more detail, he will be back in his office on Monday. -Mike
#186121From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 20, 1995 1:49 PM
Mike, thanks for your information. I'll probably try and pick Jamie's brain on Monday on the Speed Razor/PVR combo's suitability for what I have in mind. I don't know why I asked about motion blur <g>. I was probably thinking of 2d-tracking (tracking your images to points on another image) and bump stabilization. Martin
#186267From: Mike MorganAug 21, 1995 12:20 PM
Martin, I spoke to Jamie this morning and there was some good news. The new software will a thumbnail of TGA's that will enable you to do your edits in a timely fashion. Also they are working on 10 bit log or 12-14 bit per pixel file formats, this is for SGI, right?. As for the 2d-tracking , he kinda of laughed and said what do you want a Firey (which is a package around $300,00), I don't think thats going to happen. -Mike
#186277From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 21, 1995 1:15 PM
Mike, thanks for digging up the info. >> Also they are working on 10 bit log or 12-14 bit per pixel file formats, this is for SGI, right? << that's good. I wonder when they will be ready. It's an option I'm considering for film work in general. The file format .rla is an SGI file format and is used by our film-recorder. >> As for the 2d-tracking , he kinda of laughed and said what do you want a Firey << well, it may _seem_ laughable, but that new package Digital Fusion from 4dVision offers it as a $495 option on top of a $3000 base price (if memory serves). So, I thought maybe the 2d-tracking technology may be within reach of mere mortals now. I understood, from talking to our programmers that it wasn't that difficult. Now 3d tracking ….. that's a challenge <g>. Martin
#186308From: Mike MorganAug 21, 1995 3:50 PM
Martin, No problem, sounds like you'll have to work on Jamie a bit for that 2d-tracking…. maybe Speed Razor Mach IV or what ever the next release is. <g> -Mike
#186321From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 21, 1995 5:06 PM
Mike, I talked to Jamie today also and we had a very cool chat. I think we should be able to use Speed Razor in film production, probably on Alpha 300 workstations with the PVR for tests and approval purposes. I'm impressed that this company is small enough that you can talk to the president and have some influence. Try that with Adobe <g>. Actually, I haven't maybe I should see if I can talk to the president <g>. Martin
#186381From: Aug 21, 1995 8:07 PM
Martin: >> …that new package Digital Fusion from 4dVision offers it as a $495 >> option on top of a $3000 base price (if memory serves). Your memory serves very well, as usual! That is correct. I just ordered it this week, I'll let you know how it works, or just give me a few weeks with it, and stop by on your way home from work! Greg Pyros
#186419From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 21, 1995 9:14 PM
Greg, >> I just ordered it this week, I'll let you know how it works, or just give me a few weeks with it, and stop by on your way home from work! << I'm not usually passing your area until about 10pm, or later <g>. Just ordered it, eh? I must say I was put off, possibly unjustifiably, by it looking like a DOS app. Is it a DOS app? I stopped buying DOS apps quite a few months ago and am trying to stick with Windows NT one. The feature list looks interesting, however. Having spoken to Jamie I could really see how Speed Razor, on an Alpha 300, with a PVR, could make a killer compositing station for film work. Do all your tests at D1 rez on the PVR, get client approval then render the film rez version. Save a ton of diskspace and the level of interactivity would be very good. It lacks a few high end features (higher bit depths, wire removal, 2d tracking etc) but Jamie seemed open to suggestions, and I feel they could offer those as add-ons at extra cost for the folk who need them. Martin
#186345From: CSA/CAAug 21, 1995 6:05 PM
Martin, Speed Razor NT will handle 4k x 4k images, but image formats are ANI, DVM, AVI, BMP, TGA, FLC, FLI, and WAV and PAL. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates
#186355From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 21, 1995 6:35 PM
Kevin, >> Speed Razor NT will handle 4k x 4k images, but image formats are ANI, DVM, AVI, BMP, TGA, FLC, FLI, and WAV and PAL. << Jamie seemed open to the idea of adding .rla multiple bit-depth formats (10 bit log, 12-16 bit per channel). I just need to supply him with the docs and he'll look into it. Martin
#186386From: CSA/CAAug 21, 1995 8:13 PM
Martin, I must say, the in:sync guys are incredibly nice. We should have our dealer beta in a couple of days. Good to hear they may add what you need. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates
#186421From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 21, 1995 9:20 PM
Kevin, >> I must say, the in:sync guys are incredibly nice. We should have our dealer beta in a couple of days. << I agree. I was amazed considering the stick that Jamie was taking back in the early Razor Pro days, how he stayed polite and cool-headed throughout. Plus, he seemed to have come through for everybody, WRT bug fixes etc. I think Speed Razor, the PVR, on WinNT will make a great combo. Martin
#186163From: Randy JacksonAug 20, 1995 5:46 PM
<<… Also, I get a memory protect violation if I try PAR.EXE from a DOS window in Windows.>> Lyle, I find it very useful to run the PAR from WFW 3.11. I also shell from 3D Studio to the PAR. This saves time when I need to preview what an image(s) " really" looks like on the TV screen. Anything that saves time in the "Tweaking Process" is worth a try. Anyway, you may have tried the following but I will list what I did and if parts of the description are too elementary please ignore those parts. 1) Create a PIF file in the PIF editor with the following settings; (note: use your path structure for the following entries.) Program Filename: C:\DPS_PAR\PAR.EXE Window Title: PAR Start-up Directory: C:\DPS_PAR Video Memory —- Select " Low Graphics" Memory requirements: KB Required = 128 KB Desired = 640 EMS Memory KB Required = 0 KB Desired = 1024 XMS Memory KB Required = 0 KB Desired = 1024 Display Usage —Select " Full Screen" Execution —- Put an X in both the" Background" and the "Foreground" boxes. Put an X in the "Close Window on Exit" box. Click on the "Advanced" Button Make both the "Background" and "Foreground" Multitasking Priority entries 100. Leave or make " Detect Idle Time " blank. Memory Options — Put an X in the "Uses High Memory Area". Leave the rest of the Memory Options blank. Display Options —- Put an X in the "Low Graphics" and "Emulate Text Mode" boxes. Leave the rest blank. Save the PIF file as par.pif to the windows directory. Now make a new item in what ever group you want to put your PAR icon in or make a new PAR group and put it in there. To do this you need to select "New Item" from your File Menu (?) I use Norton Desktop and I can't remember the WFW dialog for making new items or groups. But if you know how to do that use the par.pif you made and enter the following c:\windows\par.pif in the "Program" entry space. If this doesn't make sense perhaps someone using WFW could take it from here. Hope this helps. If you want to shell out of 3DS to the PAR and need some suggestions let me know. There is a trade off in available RAM but I use a multiple boot configuration and sometimes really need the option. Randy