CompuServe Thread

#CDTV in CDROM EndUser

20 messages in this thread
#117705From: Michael SternbergAug 24, 1990 12:20 AM
Folks- In the August issue of CR-ROM EndUser, in the column The Bully Pulpit, mention is made of CBM's CDTV. Oops, that should have been CD-ROM Enduser. It gives a basic review of CD-TV's capabilities, is wowed by the price (<$1000). "…there is more here than meets the eye. Many applicatons can be ported to this machine, and it will open up markets that don't yet exist." CD-ROM enduser is devoted to CD-ROM titles hot off the presses and a concise view of the industry in general. Because the Amiga does not yet have widely available CD-ROM device drivers, it is rarely mentioned. Oddly enough, it is mentioned occasionally as a good machine for CD-ROM technology. Other than CDTV, what does CBM have in store for us in the future? Michael
#117709From: Don Curtis/SYSOPAug 24, 1990 1:39 AM
Michael, Since the guts of CDTV is simply an A500 less keyboard and floppy one would presume that an add-on plus necessary software will be available at some time in the future for all Amiga owners. Don
#117723From: Michael SternbergAug 24, 1990 12:15 PM
One could presume that. Michael
#117718From: Charles HillAug 24, 1990 10:18 AM
Also, the September issue of Computer Shopper has some comments in the Leviations (sp?) column. A. Levitan (sp??) says he doubts the Oct/Nov date for CDTV and guesses at a late Spring '91- and syas that developers are complaining 'cause of lack of proper CD-ROM authoring/mastering tools. -Chas
#117724From: Michael SternbergAug 24, 1990 12:20 PM
Charles, The CD_ROM EndUser article discussed the outfall of the Phillips CD-I vs CDTV race for market pre-eminence. General pundits have predicted that the first out the gate will capture the market (a la Beta v VHS ). In real terms, if CBM misses the Christmas window, then Spring '91 is not much better than Xmas '91. For the record, I am relatively ignorant of CD technologies in any regard. So a warning to anyone seeking substantial information from me: You won't get it. Michael << some day I'll learn C>> Sternberg
#117730From: Charles HillAug 24, 1990 2:16 PM
'Twould be nice for CBM to lead into a market with such profit potential as CDTV appears to have. Right now, the mideast crisis is killing computer stocks: CBM closed below $5 yesterday; IBM belos $96 (down almost $20 in two weeks); and Atari at $2.50 per share (down about 60% in two weeks). Wish I had some spare cash…if CBM releases what is speculated in October, and gets CDTV out on time, you could make a killing! -Chas
#117768From: Michael SternbergAug 24, 1990 9:04 PM
Chas- Oohh! I wish I had some disposable cash right now. At 5+ bucks a share, CBM stock looks like a buy. Michael
#117732From: Ethan SolomitaAug 24, 1990 2:16 PM
I guess AmigaVision isn't good enough for them! — Ethan
#117774From: Charles HillAug 24, 1990 9:58 PM
Well, the actual complaint was mastering. The article on CS mentioned CBM had said "just put it on a hard disk and we'll take care of it". I find that hard to believe, but that was the general gist of the column. -Chas
#117815From: Ethan SolomitaAug 25, 1990 12:27 PM
It's a good sign. Now even non-Amiga magazines are spreading Amiga-based rumors! — Ethan
#118345From: JAMES D. WILLIAMSAug 30, 1990 5:12 PM
Well, I suppose you could send CBM the hard disk and they could do the mastering… or, more practically, a tape-backup. I plan on using the Active Circuits magneto-optical drive if/when I develop for CDTV. –Eet– Director of Mayhem Extra Terrestrial Imports, Ltd.
#118411From: Charles HillAug 31, 1990 7:57 AM
I assume it doesn't make much difference what mdeium you use for pre-mastering, as long as it can hold more than 650 MB of data. From my understanding, one of the most expensive processes in CD-ROM making is the pre-mastering, where the ROM image must be placed EXACTLY how it is wanted on a large hard drive (or similar device). Has CBM released specs to developers on the driver they are using? -Chas
#118436From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffAug 31, 1990 12:05 PM
So It wouldn't do to send CBM a shoebox of floppies labelled 1-75? :*)
#118446From: Charles HillAug 31, 1990 1:56 PM
Best be BIG floppies, if you're gonna send only 75!! How about punched tape? Or even punched cards? Hmmmm…how long would a roll of punched tape have to be to have 650 Mb of data? -Chas
#118458From: Thomas HoladayAug 31, 1990 4:28 PM
Lt. Commander Data sez: There were six punches to an inch, and each punch was eight holes (or one byte). Consequently you would need precisely 1,792.86195 miles of paper tape, Captain Hill. THol() { cout << "Sir, I exist." ;}
#118485From: Charles HillAug 31, 1990 8:31 PM
Hmmm, can you imaging that in punched cards? Can you imagine dropping the card deck? Glad someone invented random access media. -Chas
#118486From: John BonoAug 31, 1990 8:31 PM
Well, Spock would say 1,792.862 miles of paper, approximately. 🙂 John
#118526From: Don Curtis/SYSOPSep 1, 1990 12:39 AM
Chas, Well…having used punched tape…memory says it got maybe 5 characters per inch…but it's been a l o n g time since I used it…so maybe the number was higher…perhaps 10 per inch. So at 10 per inch…and 650 megabytes would be 665 million bytes, that'd be 66.5 million inches…or (in round numbers) 1050 miles of tape. If my memory was right…it'd be 2100 miles of tape. Don
#119028From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffSep 4, 1990 11:57 AM
b golly.. did I say 75… I meant 750 floppies, as you have obviously noticed.. those darn decimals neither you or my bank seem to have a sense of humor! maybe I should have said casket instead of shoebox too!
#118344From: JAMES D. WILLIAMSAug 30, 1990 5:11 PM
Which developers are complaining? I sometimes wonder if Leviathan occupies the same world as I. –Eet– Director of Mayhem Extra Terrestrial Imports, Ltd.