CompuServe Thread

Architectural Front end

20 messages in this thread
#78634From: David RhotenJan 24, 1994 11:54 AM
Michael: As I know you're an expert on AutoArchitect, do you have any comments as to how Facade compares w/ and/or meshes (no pun intended) with the 3d wall/etc routines in AA? Dave
#78811From: Michael DakanJan 25, 1994 1:41 AM
Dave, I think that Facade and AA could complement each other nicely in some respects, although I haven't worked with them together like that, yet. Certain things, like generating sloped roof forms, are stronger and more flexible in Facade than in Auto-Architect. 3D Walls and openings in them are probably close to equivalant in functionality with Facade and AA, although the working methodologies are quite different to accomplish similar things… Conceptually, (I think) Facade is a model-building tool, similar to the way you might build chip-board or Strathmore models, as a separate process, for design study or presentation. As such, it might work nicely as an adjunct to AA, if you want to concentrate on a 3D model as a separate process in CAD. That's not the way I typically do it, although this is a legitimate approach in some situations. Most of the time, I think you'd use either Facade or Auto-Architect to model something, not both for the same structure. But if you want a roof with dormers, or punched skylights, Facade would save you lots of time on an otherwise AA-generated model… Michael
#78865From: David RhotenJan 25, 1994 9:41 AM
Thanks, Michael! I may have to look into Facade here shortly. I'm sure David Cohn will be offering a discount to ASOFT forum members any day now!<BG> Dave
#78899From: James M. MurphyJan 25, 1994 12:40 PM
PMJI, Michael…. I've been wondering in anyone has a better handle on creating FACADE type 3D Models for the LOG HOME industry. Here in Wisconsin there are a _Lot_ of Log Home Manufacturers mostly all of them are still doing 2d drafting. I'd like to get them in to the 3D World But the Log's in the Log Home sorta slows down this process. I'd be very interested in any Products or even Lisp Routines anyone may have developed to get 3D Log Home Structures with less trouble. Any Ideas? Thanks' Murph'
#79022From: Michael DakanJan 25, 1994 10:02 PM
Ya know, I've seen these log wall discussions before, but haven't paid much attention, since the focus has been on rendering in the past… But now that I think about it directly, yeah, Softdesk Auto-Architect would do it – at least kinda-sorta… Facade wouldn't do it in any way I can think of, or any other product I know of. A-A has Wall Styles that allow you to define a wall profile that can be "extruded" horizontally to create walls. Other applications are starting to use wall styles for wall definitions, but to my knowledge, A-A is unique because it allows you to use individual 3D faces in your Wall Style definition. These 3D Faces can be oriented other than orthogonally, so you can simulate things like cornices or crown molds at the top of a wall, for instance, or gawd forbid, a mansard roof… <g> It won't allow you to extrude a real curve, but you can approximate a curve with enough straight sections… It wouldn't take many facets before the profile would render as a smooth curve, say, 4 per log profile on each side, maybe 6? So, yeah, that might work, as long as the objective is a rendering. 4 facets would obviously be less successful as a hidden-line AutoCAD plot, so you'd need to use more faces to get an acceptable curved appearance… There are some limitations: Any single Wall Style can't use more than 24 3D Faces as part of the definition, so you probably couldn't define a full height wall… Say you did use 4 Faces to form a half-log, you could only define a 6-log section – half that if you wanted to have log profiles on each side of the wall in one Wall Style definition. But you could define several Wall Style's to make up the lower third, middle third, and upper third, and do it in three passes. Or use the same Wall Style at three elevations… Also, I'm not sure if you could use additional Faces, beyond the 24 limitation, to form the caps on the "logs", or if you could make automatic capping work at all… Normally you can define capping pairs to make sure that corresponding faces are capped properly for a wall that ends in space, but I don't _think_ these can be in addition to the 24-Face limit… I'd have to look into it a little more to be sure, but it might be hard to get the extended log corners to automatically cap properly, and you might have to do something manually here, maybe AutoCAD Donuts… You'd have a similar problem where you broke the walls to insert doors and windows, unless these areas were covered with a wide jamb section… But other than that, this might work rather well, compared to any alternative I can think of. In any case it's probably worth checking out as a starting point, at least…
#79331From: James M. MurphyJan 27, 1994 1:51 AM
Thanks Michael. Actually this is what I was hopping to avoid. I was kind of looking for a "Wall Definition" type of routine that would prompt you for relative log size etc! Something more parametric. My biggest problem getting people from 2D to 3D is the learning curve and just reading your description reminded my why I gave up the AutoCAD Dealership in favor of the 3D Studio Dealership. Most of the clients I have in the A&E and Construction Trades are still very resistant to drawing in 3D…I'm looking for Products and services that make it a no Brainer for em' Maybe a feature like Record and Playback Session like Fractal Painter Has would allow us to manually do the tough stuff for them once and then just let them "Play Back" each Wall Routine as per needed on the different wall types and projects….heh….heh…guess that's a long shot too <g>. Murph'
#79143From: David Cohn, CADalystJan 26, 1994 11:08 AM
James: It would certainly be something we would consider for a future release of Facade. Right now, the walls are flat surfaced, as are the walls in virtually every other architectural front-end I have ever seen. It might be possible to create a wall-style with KETIV's package that would mimic a log profiled wall. Check with them. You might also try getting in touch with a company called Panabode just outside of Vancouver (in Surrey I believe). That's area code 604. They're a major log home builder (we're talking pre-packaged and shipped world-wide). They developed their own log home application for AutoCAD. They're taken it to the point where it actually produces cut lists for their specially profiled logs. But they also did a pre-design/visualization program that lets a designer sit down with a client and quickly put together a log home and then view it in 3D. They might be willing to share some of their expertise with you. David
#79202From: James M. MurphyJan 26, 1994 4:39 PM
David, >> Panabode just outside of Vancouver (in Surrey I believe). That's area code 604 << Thanks a GIG! David….I'll call Information and see if they've got them listed. I appreciate the Feed Back. Murph'
#79249From: Dave Byrnes [AEC TM]Jan 26, 1994 7:17 PM
James – you looking for Panabode? Here they are: Panabode International Ltd 6311 Graybar Road Richmond, B.C. V6W 1H3 CANADA Phone (604) 270 7891 David forgot to mention that CADalyst profiled Panabode in a *very* early issue. Dave <North Vancouver, B.C.>
#79337From: James M. MurphyJan 27, 1994 2:09 AM
Thanks Dave…I'll Call Em' Murph'
#79392From: David Cohn, CADalystJan 27, 1994 10:33 AM
Jim: No problem. There's also an article about them in an ancient CADalyst from 1987. I don't remember the exact issue date (and those issues from before I arrived on staff are not in the retrievable index). David
#79524From: James M. MurphyJan 28, 1994 1:41 AM
My copies only go back to 1991. However I've got their Number now. Thanks Again David! Murph'
#79532From: Conrad StolzeJan 28, 1994 2:42 AM
David, Could you EMail me info on the company that created Facade, sounds like a product I would like to deal! Chuck
#79613From: David Cohn, CADalystJan 28, 1994 4:12 PM
Chuck: You're talking to them. Facade is marketed exclusively by: Eclipse Software, Inc. 301 West Holly Street, Suite U4 Bellingham, WA 98225 (800) 768-6779 or (206) 676-6175 fax: (206) 676-0921 I am the president of the company. The software is written by Paul Stocks and Don Obertur. Paul is formerly with Caricato Systems down in Santa Rosa, CA. Caricato marketed the original version of Facade and is also responsible for a program called Architectural Power Tools, which we also now have exclusive rights to, so there is often some confusion. Eclipse also develops and markets a line of plot spooling software known as PLUMP. We would be glad to sign you up as a dealer for Facade and any of our other products that you might be interested in. Call Susan Whyte at (206) 676-6175. She handles orders. If you've got any specific questions regarding Facade, I'd be glad to answer them. As the resident architect, I end up with most of the Facade and APT questions. David [Eclipse Software]
#79666From: Conrad StolzeJan 28, 1994 9:55 PM
David, DUH! I'll call in and talk to Susan, Wanting to hide right now, and glad 98% of you don't know my face (no GIF files please!<BG>) Chuck
#79735From: Jan 29, 1994 11:57 AM
Chuck: >> glad 98% of you don't know my face And the other 2% of us who do wish we didn't! <bg> Sorry, but you left such a big opening I had to stick my foot in it!! Greg Pyros
#79742From: David Cohn, CADalystJan 29, 1994 12:13 PM
Don't worry about it. I try not to make a big deal of wearing both hats because it occassionally upsets people who don't know me and don't realize that I really can keep my business separate from my duties with CADalyst.
#79748From: Conrad StolzeJan 29, 1994 12:41 PM
David, As I had detected when we had breakfast that morning in Bellvue, WA (Dr. Pixel's stompin' ground) with Karen, you could best be described as professional. I am just embarrassed that I didn't figure this out from the info you were providing about Facade! I'll call in, as I am definitely interested (unless you could EMAIL me dealer pricing info, as we are sponsoring an MCAD seminar this Wed/Thu and I will not have an opportunity before then! please! ).
#79734From: Jan 29, 1994 11:57 AM
David/Chuck: I have to add that Facade is a great package! I just started working with it, but the ease of use is incredible! Even I can run it! <g> We became dealers on the strength of David's recommendation, and he hasn't steered us wrong yet! (At least in recent memory! <g>) And he sure didn't this time! Go for it, Chuckster! Greg
#79747From: Conrad StolzeJan 29, 1994 12:41 PM
Based on the info I gathered from the thread, I think that Facade is just the product we need. Now, if I can just get past the Mechanical seminar we are having Wednesday…………<ZZZZzzzz> Chuck