CompuServe Thread

music

13 messages in this thread
#136From: Jeff PrattSep 9, 1990 1:28 AM
Jeff, Hello and welcome. Music capabilities played a large part in my decision to go with the Amiga also. I compose ( when time allows ) for small choral groups, vocal + (acoustic) instrument ensembles, and combinations of the two… plus occasionally for brass quartet or trio. While I do occasionally make submissions to publishers, that aspect is not particularly important to me. I'm always on the lookout for good lyrics. Haven't ever actually collaborated with anyone, but of course there's always a first. Dr. T's Copyist is real good for production of sheet music, scores, etc. It is, however, copy-protected, which prevents me from giving it a 100% endorsement. There are several good sequencer programs available, but they all require some real-time keyboard performance technique ( not as much as a tape recorder, however ). Deluxe Music Construction Set from Electrionic Arts is an acceptable music input + feedback program for those of us who are notation-oriented; I have had pretty good success composing in DMCS and exporting the results to Copyist for addition of texts, dynamic markings, etc, and printing. ( An 8 1/2 x 11 page of music takes about 12 minutes on a Panasonic KXP1091i. I'm saving up for a Laser printer… ) One other program you should definitely check out is Bars & Pipes, from Blue Ribbon Bakery. I was very impressed by the demo version, which I tried a while back. If I had more $$$, I'd have got the real version by now…. Good luck to you in your efforts ! | _ |_> \_|.<_.|.
#425From: Vicky AdairSep 16, 1990 11:25 PM
What do you think of Sonix?
#617From: Jeff PrattSep 22, 1990 3:34 PM
Can't say I have any opinion as I've never used it. Some folks have, and have had good success from what I've heard, but maybe one of them will be able to respond to you….(hint, hint) | _ |_> \_|.<_.|.
#631From: Terry CarrollSep 22, 1990 9:00 PM
Sonix is frustrating to use, but can yield some beautiful results compared to DMCS. It also has a stand-alone player, so you can play Sonix tunes without buying Sonix (unlike DMCS). -tc
#650From: David ArtSep 22, 1990 10:53 PM
Terry, There is a player available for DMCS files that have been saved from DMCS in SMUS format. (menu option) It's called DPLAY and is here in DL7 as DPLAY.ZOO. It does a fair job of playing the files – better than AmigaVision's player, but not as good as DMCS itself. It does trash location zero, though, in the process. To the best of my knowledge, you are correct in that there is not a player that will play DMCS files in native mode. David
#693From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPSep 23, 1990 4:46 PM
The problem with AmigaVision's player is that they assume that SMUS files are generated under the concept that each SMUS track is assigned to a different audio channel, which is the way SMUS was really originally conceived. (That way you can take advantage of the stereo for effects and similar things, and the music will generally sound better in stereo anyway.) DMCS, on the other hand, doesn't believe in such things, and the concept of stereo is totally foreign to it. DMCS allocates a play channel on a note by note basis, so you get voices which shift back and forth (although when you stick with a four voice score, the shifts are often, but not always, aligned with instrument changes…) and no stereo effect, and you can play a score with more than four notes at the same time, and it will just drop the extras. It pretty much assumes that SMUS players work the same way, so it creates SMUS files to fit it's own personality, and that is why most SMUS players don't like DMCS SMUS files that much. –>Steve Bennett
#733From: David ArtSep 24, 1990 1:32 AM
Steve, What you say is true, but, since DMCS is such a common program, one would think that the player could at least make a good effort to handle the format. With the exception of the shifting notes between channels that's really a function of the Amiga hardware, most modern multi-timbral synthesizers use a method similar to DMCS to handle extra notes. The concept of chorded notes, though, is definitely in the SMUS spec. The limitation of some SMUS programs to one note/track, while understandable for the reason that you mention, is not a requirement of the spec. I'm looking forward to the Bars & Pipes Multi-Media Kit, myself. That way, I won't be worrying about SMUS and/or implementation problems in AV. 8) David
#762From: Sep 24, 1990 8:37 PM
The Multi-Media Kit for Bars&Pipes is shipping. The first boxes went out last week. Call your dealers!
#780From: David ArtSep 24, 1990 10:49 PM
Melissa, Thanks for the info that the Multi_Media Kit is shipping. I'll be watching for it. 8) One question, though. Will the MIDI player be able to play sampled instruments (i.e. use AmigoPhone)? I know that the name would seem to indicate otherwise, but, I'm hoping, since there's a real need. The SMUS players just don't seem to be able to give the consistency and quality necessary for top notch presentations. If it's not in the package now, please consider it for the future. David
#1048From: Sep 30, 1990 4:27 PM
At this time, the MIDI player plays only via MIDI. However, don't be surprised to see a Multi-Media Kit II in the future. We want to keep up to date with our users' need and the latest multi-media applications.
#772From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPSep 24, 1990 10:15 PM
Yes, chorded notes were indeed included in the SMUS spec, primarily to be used with MIDI, which is another of the original concepts in SMUS. (Not that it did MIDI particularly well, IMHO. On the other hand, I don't think ANYONE has defined a proper score format with MIDI in mind yet.) –>Steve Bennett
#781From: David ArtSep 24, 1990 10:55 PM
Standard MIDI File Format (sometimes called either SMF or MMF) isn't bad. Copyist will import from it acceptably, or so they say. I've been hoping that somebody will write a(n) MFF player for the Amiga. There's a lot of music available in MFF. We'll have to see if Blue Ribbon Bakery has any surprises up their sleeve in Bars & Pipes Professional. 8)
#783From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPSep 24, 1990 11:07 PM
My problem with MFF, and indeed just about any MIDI scoring/sequencing format, is it doesn't seperate the instrument from the music. So when you want to play this nice song you downloaded which was created on some Roland keyboard, and you have a Yamaha keyboard, it doesn't work very well without a lot of tweaking. Ideally, a score format should reference different instrument sounds by their names, or by a number in a lookup table, so that all one needs to do to *play* the score is describe his own instrument setup to the player, which need only be done once. SMUS is close in that it handles this kind of thing properly for internal style instruments, but then they went and did MIDI all wrong, IMHO.