CompuServe Thread

#IFF Chunky Pixel

7 messages in this thread
#1144From: Kevin NorthoverSep 26, 1990 10:00 PM
I recently registered as a developer with CATS. I use the Amiga to develop image processing and matching software, mainly for automatic fingerprint recognition. At the moment I have a very ad hoc collection of program harnesses used for developing compression algorithms. I want to rationalise these, at the moment I use my own chunky pixel (1 byte/pixel, 255 level) image format. Are there any IFF standards for chunky pixel as opposed to bitplane images in the works? Another question, is anyone working on a JPEG compression algorithm implementation for the Amiga? Any and all comments welcomed. Kevin
#1170From: Vic WagnerSep 27, 1990 12:46 PM
Kevin, I'm interested in compressions schemes also. Have you been in touch with Michael Barnsley of Iterated Systems? Unfortunately they want several thousands of dollars upfront. Also unfortunately, they don't seem interested in having their stuff ported to the Amiga, but they _do_ get impressive compression (fractal compression)..claiming 100-1 and such. As for the chunky pixel, I haven't heard of any such proposal for IFF. Of course, you must keep images (which are to be displayed) in bitplane format in the Amiga…but those you're working on certainly don't have to be. BTW, how does one go about getting a copy of the JPEG compression algorithm? Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
#1294From: Kevin NorthoverSep 30, 1990 8:32 PM
I've read the general publications on Barnsleys methods. I'm not impressed. The encoding computation costs are horrendous (and fingerprint archives are huge, small systems are >300,000 images). Second he seems to require human intervention to encode. I can't accept that. As for JPEG the most recent suggestion I saw (in the ACM Comms multimedia article) was to contact ANSI, 1430 Broadway, NY 10018 and ask for the draft standard. I'll try it next week and let you know. Kevin
#1333From: Vic WagnerOct 1, 1990 12:13 PM
Kevin, The latest I have from Barnsley indicated completely 'automatic' compression. I agree that compression seems to be slow (they have a hardware assist board for the PC), but his stuff is clearly, IMHO, for publishers (where the data will be read a lot and written seldom). Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
#1245From: Ariel ButlerSep 29, 1990 5:19 PM
Kevin: We're looking at the JPEG algorithm for something we're doing with image archival on the Amiga. Unfortunately, at the data rates we are running it would be impossible to compress in software. Luckily for us there is a company called C-Cubed that is developing a JPEG chipset for the broadcast industry. They claim that their chips can compress in milliseconds what would take a 25mhz 68030 over an hour (!). C-Cubed intends to sample right about now. Ariel
#1275From: Vic WagnerSep 30, 1990 3:42 PM
Ari, Please keep us informed. Has anyone else been contacted by those guys in Atlanta (name USED to be "Iterated Systems") who do fractal compression/decompression? I personally think their price is too high…unless, e.g. C= picked up the license for ALL Amigas. The thought of having reasonable de-compress times (a second) and 100-1 image compression has a certain appeal. Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
#1295From: Kevin NorthoverSep 30, 1990 8:36 PM
I know of the chipset. For my application I can do compression much faster than JPEG with probably comparable image quality at the same compression. My client wants software, the incremental hardware cost hurts his marketing (he says). But I'm very specialised. The new NeXT machine graphics board includes the C-Cube chip, but at 3,995 for the board !! Kevin