CompuServe Thread

#AAP v2.0

16 messages in this thread
#55583From: Stephen BowlsbyAug 31, 1993 2:07 AM
I have heard a rumor that there is an Animator Pro version 2.0 out now. Is that true? And if it is, don't registered users of v1.3 get mailed update info or something? I'm new to the whole computer animation and modem thing…
#55643From: MARTIN G FOSTERAug 31, 1993 11:53 AM
Stephen, I don't think there is any Animator Pro 2.0 out yet, or much hint of one either.
#55872From: James M. MurphySep 2, 1993 12:03 AM
Martin, >>> I don't think there is any Animator Pro 2.0 out yet, or much hint of one either. <<< The latter part of your statement seems to indicate that along with some of the rest of us you don't feel that there will actually be a 2.0 Animator Pro. Would one then also assume there will be an entirely different product offering that one who has invested in Ani-Pro 1.3 may then upgrade too. Why would Autodesk "patch" 24bit graphics code to an 8bit software package as opposed to.. writting it/purchase it.. for the 24bit to begin with. I for one would be interested in Beta Testing such a package. <BG> LaTER, James M. Murphy
#55876From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 2, 1993 12:19 AM
James, I haven't really given up in my hope for an Animator pro 2.0, I just stopped speculating about it. I haven't been able to get any kind of info on what's up Adesk's/Jim Kents's sleeve. They're all very tight-lipped. I guess I'll have to just wait for an official announcement.
#55879From: James M. MurphySep 2, 1993 12:37 AM
Me-thinks thou doest protest in vain. James
#55884From: James M. MurphySep 2, 1993 1:58 AM
Martin, >> I haven't been able to get any kind of info on what's up Adesk's/Jim Kents's sleeve << Sooooo tell us more about Jim Kent and why he's so tight lipped latly? James
#55962From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 2, 1993 12:42 PM
James, all I know, which is public knowledge anyway, is that Jim Kent was hired by Autodesk to work on "something". The "something" is what everybody's tight-lipped on – but that's normal Adesk policy.
#56066From: James M. MurphySep 3, 1993 9:28 AM
Martin, >> Jim Kent was hired by Autodesk to work on "something". The "something" is what everybody's tight-lipped on – but that's normal Adesk policy. << I guess this is begging the question…What is Jim Kent Really good at doing? Sorry but I don't know Jim so I'm curious as to what his specialties are. Jus' Look N' for Insight! <g> James M. Murphy
#55974From: David TaffetSep 2, 1993 2:10 PM
Well, in the interests of idle speculation, lets' say that Jim Kent was hired by Autodesk to upgrade AAP to a 24-bit version because the project is *so* ugly the Yosters didn't want to tackle it and the subsequent announcement of the competitive upgrade was part of an attempt to raise money and interest in the product to both pay for the work and to see if it would really be worth doing. (If this were TV's Police Squad, we'd now both be reciting that in {more or less} unison.<g>) DT
#55991From: charles jamesonSep 2, 1993 5:45 PM
Of course AAP will run under windows? right? with an OS/2 version coming? a ha, of course, they are waiting for NT to get into wide use <grin>. Chuck Jameson Silver Tongue Software
#56078From: David TaffetSep 3, 1993 11:09 AM
>AAP will run under windows< Of COURSE it will! And it will be delivered by Cindy Crawford and Kathy Ireland, or Robert Redford and Sean Connery, depending on your predelictions…. <g> DT
#56035From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 3, 1993 4:04 AM
David, interesting bit of idle speculation, that is. I hope it's true.
#56081From: David TaffetSep 3, 1993 11:09 AM
If it's true, I hope "we all" responded enough to make it happen… DT
#56069From: James M. MurphySep 3, 1993 9:28 AM
David Taffett, >>> Well, in the interests of idle speculation, lets' say that Jim Kent was hired by Autodesk to upgrade AAP to a 24-bit version because the project is *so* ugly the Yosters didn't want to tackle it and the subsequent announcement of the competitive upgrade was part of an attempt to raise money and interest in the product to both pay for the work and to see if it would really be worth doing. (If this were TV's Police Squad, we'd now both be reciting that in {more or less} unison.<g>) <<< David!! May I quote you…….NATIONALY. James M. Murphy DT
#56070From: James M. MurphySep 3, 1993 9:28 AM
David, >>> (If this were TV's Police Squad, we'd now both be reciting that in {more or less} unison.<g>) <<<< Sayyyyy Dave….have you ever noticed that the less law and order we have in the real world..the more cop shows they put on TV? I think there are waaayyyy toooo many Cop and Lawyer show..don't you? James
#55644From: David RhotenAug 31, 1993 12:00 PM
Sorry, Stephen. No AniPro 2.0, at least not right now — and Autodesk's policy is that they won't talk about something until they're ready to release it. Dave