CompuServe Thread

#Targa 2000?

19 messages in this thread
#123987From: Scott LawrenceSep 15, 1994 4:57 PM
Martin, I was just re-reading a thread in which you had an interesting and somewhat heated <G> debate about the merits of the PAR vs. MAX with John Tissavary. I was wondering what your opinion was re: Targa 2000? I'm having a hard time getting the scoop (from actual users) about this board. Somebody must be using it…right? Thanks! -Scott Lawrence-
#124011From: Gus GrubbaSep 15, 1994 6:58 PM
Hy there, Martin is out somewhere in Europe and won't be back 'till the 19th. Just to let you know so you don't think he's just avoided your question… 🙂
#124030From: Scott LawrenceSep 15, 1994 10:13 PM
Gus, Thanks for the artful intercept! Perhaps you are familiar with this board (T2K)? Thanks, Scott Lawrence
#124182From: Gus GrubbaSep 16, 1994 6:09 PM
>> Perhaps you are familiar with this board (T2K)? Nop. Schlitz… Two people come to mind though, try Ana (krazy images) and/or Kevin Krell.
#124877From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 21, 1994 1:42 PM
Scott, >> I was wondering what your opinion was re: Targa 2000? << I just got back from 5 weeks in the computer-free wilderness ….. what's a Targa 2000? Just kidding, I know what it is. I considered it when I was shopping for a JPEG card, but quickly discounted it for me. I settled on the best shipping solution – the PAR. I don't claim to know much about the T2000, but it seemed to marketed to a slightly different crowd than the PAR or MAX. It seemed to be a very high-quality Video for Windows card working at only up to 640×480 and didn't have component output. It hard features I don't think I needed. The suggested data throughputs seemed low. Plus, it was too much money for my budget ($5995 not including disk). This may have all changed and hopefully someone with more knowledge will step in.
#124887From: CSA/CASep 21, 1994 2:01 PM
Welcome back, Martin. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates
#125078From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 22, 1994 1:12 PM
Kevin, thanks Kevin, I'm glad to be back 🙂
#125296From: CSA/CASep 23, 1994 11:50 AM
Martin, And I'd be glad to be gone. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates
#125514From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 25, 1994 4:09 PM
Kevin, > Glad to be back < >> And I'd be glad to be gone. << Good twist on my words <G>. Reminds me of a post card somewhere in Europe based on the old classic line: "the weather's beautiful, wish you were here" the humourous postcard says: "the weather's here, wish you were beautiful!" Gave me a laugh, anyway 🙂 Martin
#125554From: Sep 25, 1994 10:53 PM
Martin: >> "the weather's here, wish you were beautiful!" Or the Freudian slip: The weather is beautiful, wish you were her! Greg Pyros
#125653From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 26, 1994 12:51 PM
Greg, >> Or the Freudian slip: The weather is beautiful, wish you were her! << Nice one, Greg <G>.
#125011From: Ted BoardmanSep 22, 1994 7:19 AM
Hey Martin, You look well tanned and rested<g> BACK TO WORK! Welcome back, TedB !^NavFont01F0007MGHHG43B1C2
#125079From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 22, 1994 1:13 PM
Ted, >> You look well tanned and rested<g> BACK TO WORK! << tanned – maybe, rested – no. I rarely rest on vacation. I'm getting my rest back in SoCal before all the work starts again 🙂
#125546From: David RhotenSep 25, 1994 10:39 PM
>>tanned – maybe, rested – no. I rarely rest on vacation. IMHO, that's the difference between a "trip" and a "vacation". I took a "trip" to England, now I NEED a "vacation"!<G> Good to see we both made it back w/o disaster! Dave
#125654From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 26, 1994 12:51 PM
David, >> I took a "trip" to England, now I NEED a "vacation"!<G> << I'll second that! Why don't you give us a run down of your "trip" – only please start a new thread in the "Take 5" section to avoid forum etiquette infractions 🙁
#125039From: Scott LawrenceSep 22, 1994 10:20 AM
Martin, Thanks for your T2 critique…seems to be the common concensus around here that the Targa 2000 is inadequate for most animator's needs. It's PAR for the course! <G> -Scott P.S. Hope you had an enjoyable vacation!
#125080From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 22, 1994 1:13 PM
Scott, >> It's PAR for the course! <G> << I still recommend the PAR to most folk, unless they already have an Illuminator Pro framebuffer – in which case you could consider the add-on JPEG board for that.
#125239From: Scott LawrenceSep 23, 1994 3:08 AM
Martin, Everyone here seems to share your enthusiam for the PAR. I think I'll get it & also the Intel Smart Video Recorder for simultaneous capture of vidio/audio for multimedia. I can get the PAR, TBCIV, Smart Video Rec Pro and a Micropolis 2217A for less than the cost of the 2000! -Scott- P.S. Loved your "L-A-S-E-R" contribution to the Sig '94 reel!
#125372From: MARTIN G FOSTERSep 23, 1994 11:05 PM
Scott, >> P.S. Loved your "L-A-S-E-R" contribution to the Sig '94 reel! << gosh, er, thanks Scott. Glad you liked it 🙂