CompuServe Thread

Best 3DS video card?

8 messages in this thread
#187420From: M3 SweattAug 26, 1995 3:54 PM
I am posting this message for a friend who is expanding his drafting practice, moving to Pentium PCs with AutoCad 13 on Windows, maybe WinNT. He also plans to use 3DStudio to demonstrate his renderings. Which video board and accelerator would you suggest as the best use for a new system, and the best screen resolution? I know that he's looking at several different monitor sizes, and wants to make sure that he gets the best bang for his buck. I recently saw the Top 10 Accelerators list in the Sept issue of PC World, but I'm concerned that 1024×768 and 800×600 resolution won't be enough. If you were setting up a system from scratch, what would you choose? Is 1600×1280 necessary? Looking in the $2-300 and the $4-800 range, depending on the features (useing the cheaper card in his home system and maxing out on the system at the office, unless there's a happy medium where we can put the same card in all machines that will deliver the performace). I would appreciate any help. Thanks. —M3
#187620From: Tom Lansford [ARTIST]Aug 28, 1995 9:11 AM
Hi M3, Didn't I just see you in the AutoCAD forum… <g> Just wanted to say that if your friend is thinking of going to 3DS MAX, that he should also look into the ELSA GLoria. The GLoria is like a WINNER 2000PRO/X with the addition of 3D hardware acceleration thanks to a GLINT chip. Basically that means that you get 2D performance in NT from the Vision968 chip and 3D performance from the GLINT, ie: no sacrifices… 🙂 Sincerely, Tom
#187698From: ALAN IGLESIASAug 28, 1995 2:10 PM
Tom, could you go into a little detail about the Elsa card you are talking about? I'd like to know which Glint chip you are using, the maximum color depth, resolutions and scan rates, RAM requirements, and any co-processor support for rendering other than rasterization, say for transformations and clipping. Thanks much, -Alan
#187857From: Tom Lansford [ARTIST]Aug 29, 1995 6:25 AM
Hi Alan, The 3Dlabs chip we are using is the latest available, the 300/SX. I need to put together the technical information on the GLoria anyway, so if you can wait a bit, I'll post/upload some complete information. Not to leave you hanging… the GLoria always has 8 Mb DRAM, and can have either 4 or 8 Mb VRAM. Sooo, top resolutions and color depths are: GLoria-4: 1600x1280x16bpp @ 80 Hz GLoria-8: 1600x1280x32bpp @ 80 Hz If you drop to 1600×1200, then the refresh rate on both of those jumps to 85 Hz. The board does not have a geometry engine on it. Any work that is not done either by the Vision968 or the GLINT chip is done by the host. I hope that helps. Like I said, I will try to put all the information together and get something uploaded, but there's a developer conference this weekend and part of next week, so if you don't see before Friday, then it will be at least another week before I can get it done. Sincerely, Tom
#187912From: ALAN IGLESIASAug 29, 1995 12:08 PM
Thanks for the info, Tom! So your 8Mb version supports full True-Color, eh? I wonder what the rendering speed hit is compared to say, 16bpp dithered to 24. -Alan
#188041From: Tom Lansford [ARTIST]Aug 30, 1995 7:01 AM
Hi Alan, The rendering speed for the GLoria is basically the same for 16bpp dithered and 24bpp. Sincerely, Tom
#188112From: ALAN IGLESIASAug 30, 1995 12:56 PM
Sounds great Tom. Thanks very much, -Alan
#187819From: M3 SweattAug 29, 1995 12:41 AM
Hi, Tom — >> Didn't I just see you in the AutoCAD forum… <g> Multitasking, you know… Thanks for the information — I'd like to get more info on your cards, HC, specs, etc. I'll e-mail you my address. I've heard plenty lately about the GLiNT, but concerned that in the near-med term it may be supplanted by other 3D chips, in terms of power/performance and price point. Thanks for your help. —M3