CompuServe Thread

#PVR vs. Targa 2000

8 messages in this thread
#189876From: Kenneth A. LaySep 8, 1995 8:54 PM
Does anyone have a good comparision of these two video capture/playback cards? The PVR looks like a choice piece of equipment, but I have heard that it doesn't work as smoothly with Adobe premiere as Razor Pro. I already have Premiere. I will primarily use the card I get for outputting 3D-Studio animations to tape, and rendering the transitions, and integrating captured video with them through Premiere. Would it be worth it to go to Razor Pro? Any comments on this subject would be appreciated. PS: does anyone know the approximate time it takes to convert 100 TGA frames (640×480, 24-bit) to ANI files with the PAR or PVR? Just need to know a "ballpark" figure for the conversion time.
#189931From: Tim Krego, [pro.image]Sep 9, 1995 3:11 AM
>Does anyone have a good comparision of these two video capture/playback cards? The PVR looks like a choice piece of equipment, but I have heard that it doesn't work as smoothly with Adobe premiere as Razor Pro. I already have Premiere.< Premiere doesn't support the PAR/PVR as well as Razor Pro. >I will primarily use the card I get for outputting 3D-Studio animations to tape, and rendering the transitions, and integrating captured video with them through Premiere. Would it be worth it to go to Razor Pro? Any comments on this subject would be appreciated.< Probably if you end up getting the NT version it lists for $1499. Ouch. >PS: does anyone know the approximate time it takes to convert 100 TGA frames (640×480, 24-bit) to ANI files with the PAR or PVR? Just need to know a "ballpark" figure for the conversion time.< On the PAR probably about 5 seconds or so per frame. Should be faster on the PVR since it uses the PCI bus. I don't have my PVR yet, and I sold my PAR in May, so the times are approximate.
#190155From: Kenneth A. LaySep 10, 1995 4:08 PM
Do you know the actual differences between how Premiere and Speed Razor/Razor Pro interface with the PVR, why is one better than the other?.
#190504From: Claus DiekmannSep 12, 1995 5:13 PM
Hi Kenneth, I am just waiting for the harddrives and premiere 4.0a for my PVR. Hope it will arrive this week, so I can tell you something from this side later. The manual of the PVR says, that it only works with the version Premiere 4.0a! Claus Diekmann
#190532From: Kenneth A. LaySep 12, 1995 8:51 PM
Thanks alot. Waiting to hear more from your experience.
#190158From: CSA/CASep 10, 1995 4:41 PM
Kenneth, Premiere does not work under Windows NT (and the PVR is intended for NT – Win 3.1 support is a bit squirrelly). Speed Razor under NT would be a reasonable way to go (you've been told about the pricing though). Targa 2000 with Razor Pro is fine under Win 3.1 (T2000 drivers for NT still in progress). Throughput on the T2000 suffers from the Windows method of copying to memory, THEN to disk. This will not occur in Win NT. PVR & PAR avoid transfers across the bus, since the drives connect directly. Of course, the T2000 provides a high-res Windows 24-bit display, and the PAR & PVR have none. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates
#190709From: Eron Bruce CohenSep 13, 1995 5:58 PM
My $.02: Speed Razor will work great with the PVR and the Targa 2000 under NT. The Targa 2000 PCI Pro is a very nice card. One of the biggest differences between the Targa and the PVR is that with the PVR audio is handled seperately and is stored on your system drives (rather than on the PVR drives). The Targa 2k has its own file format (which Razor reads and writes directly to) which contains both the audio and video. Eron.
#190735From: CSA/CASep 13, 1995 8:24 PM
Hi Eron, Now if Truevision would just get the darn T2000 Pro out, with NT drivers. BTW, how's progress on Speed Razor – or are you waiting for the PVR NT drivers? Just sold a couple more, but had to split off as Razor Pro now, upgrades later. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates