#Slow Mo
7 messages in this thread
Hank,
What did you think of the Flyer process? The effects look pretty good, much
better than before, but still loses quite a bit of quality — p probably
unavoidable…
Sam,
Well, the process is straight forward with the script, but it doesn't always
seem to work. Not sure why, as it works on some clips and not others. I wonder
if there is a problem with certain resolutions.
Had slo mo work once, but got lots of flashing in the first frames.
Still testing,
Hank
Videology, Inc Where you always get P.O.M.P. and
Service under all circumstances
Hank,
The process worked fine for me. I tested -all- of them. Despite a slight loss
of resolution (well, a big loss) they looked pretty good.
Sam,
Did you do them on entire clips starting at :00? Or just on subsegments? I'll
be doing more testing to see if there is a pattern.
Hank
Videology, Inc Where you always get P.O.M.P. and
Service under all circumstances
Hank, see previous message…
<<<Well, the process is straight forward with the script, but it doesn't always
seem to work. Not sure why, as it works on some clips and not others. I wonder
if there is a problem with certain resolutions.
Had slo mo work once, but got lots of flashing in the first frames.>>>
Hank
Are you referring to the macro in the TPaint Process screen or something new
that I haven't found yet??? If it's the one in TPaint, I've been able to get
it working. It's definitely not as good quality as using DMC on a video deck
but it passes for some uses. (Boy, I sure do miss the Beta decks with DMC that
I used at FOX-38)
BarryVedros
ISI
Hi Barry,
I've been using the FlyerProc.rexx script in the NewTek/Arexx/Editor drawer
outlined in the readme file on the 4.06 install disk 1. These processes take 4
seconds or less per field (yes field) and offer forward and reverse slo.mo and
speed up with interger factors.
Try a few and see what you think.
Hank
Videology, Inc Where you always get P.O.M.P. and
Service under all circumstances