#FlyerClip Work?
8 messages in this thread
Here's My try at it dean.
Click on Flyerproc.
Requester says Source Clip? I click on VideoB followed by click on (clip of my
choice).Click on continue.
Requester says Save Clip Where? I type in FlyerA:Test then click continue.
Requester says Start Time. I leave at default 00:00:00:00 click continue.
Requester says End Time. I add to window 00:00:03:00 and click continue.
Requester says Enter Clip Process. Here I delete and add -x1 and click
continue. Amiga Dos Window appears and says "generating 181 fields in reverse
and each one takes 4 secs to produce. Must be my Warp Engine makes it faster.
Nick Rahal's 4000 is a standard 040 and takes about 9 secs each field. Anyhow,
the clip plays backward exactly in resolution as forward. Script works for me.
What happens if you try this procedure on your machine?
THE VIDEO GUY- a professional video
taping service
Paul,
You say the clip plays back exactly in resolution of forward?
What format was your source clip recorded on?
Standard was the choice on that try.
THE VIDEO GUY- a professional video
taping service
<<standard 040 and takes about 9 secs each field>>
Hmmmm…My 040-25MHz takes about 4 sec/field…wonder why the diff?
Will try your FlyerProc procedure and let you know.
The guy who wrote the macro is probably amazed at all the fuss over getting it
to execute.
Thanks,
dean
Maybe the clip we tried on Nick's machine was HQ5. My clip experiments were
with standard. Thus, more information to assimulate, more time to process.
THE VIDEO GUY- a professional video
taping service
<<Maybe the clip we tried on Nick's machine was HQ5. My clip experiments were
with standard. Thus, more information to assimulate, more time to process.>>
Well, the clip I tried was HQ5. Although I think the New Clip screen had
Standard engaged (HQ5 in F10-setup screen). Perhaps it rewrote it in Standard.
Does the processed clip retain the original quality setting or use the quality
setting currently selected?
-dean
I processed HQ clips on my 33mHZ A2000 and they took about 3 seconds per
field…
Right Dean. The docs noted it should take about 4 secs per field (or 9 seconds
per frame?) and I noted that some, maybe with less detail, went faster. Our
demo unit is the 4000/040/25.
Hank
Videology, Inc Where you always get P.O.M.P. and
Service under all circumstances