CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Audiophile

#MIDI-VOICES

17 messages in this thread
#36553From: MARC LIMATAOct 17, 1986 9:58 PM
A CZ1000 is the large key CZ101 , IT is EXACTLY the same as a CZ101 except for the fact it uses standard size keys. It's cost is about $399 or typically $100 to $150 more than a CZ101. You are thinking of the CZ-1 which CASIO was trying to sell at $1395.00 and does respond to velocity data on Midi AND from its keyboard . The CZ-1 is floundering badly and most remaining dealers are selling them at $900 to $950 just to get rid of them. Don't get me wrong CASIO does make some good stuff like their new Drum Machine , If I were looking to spend $250 for a CZ101 I would take a serious look first at a Yamaha DX100 (about $350) or a DX27.
#36786From: Chris GriggOct 20, 1986 2:52 AM
I stand corrected, it must have been a CZ-1 I played. I agree: if you wanted to buy a dinky synth, you should look at the CZ101, DX100, and DX27.
#36837From: MARC LIMATAOct 20, 1986 9:45 PM
Do you think the DX100/27 are dinky ??
#37031From: Chris GriggOct 23, 1986 3:11 AM
Hmm, "dinkiness" is a ticklish question, isn't it? DX100/27 are pretty amazing compared to all home computers' built-in sound guts so far. DX100/27 is on a par with Casio CZ-101, Yamaha FB-01, etc. DX-100/27 is dinky compared with DX7, Emulator II, Mirage, digital reverbs, etc. DX-100/27 is miniscule vis-a-vis Kurzweil, Fairlight, Synclavier. I've worked with people who own all of these horrible noisemakers, and my immediate co-workers are on the DX7/Emulator II level, so YES, within the context of the kinds of synthesizers I'm used to using (when I use synthesizers, which is NOT always!!), the DX100/27 is/are dinky. No offense intended; just a question of what one's used to.
#37031From: Chris GriggOct 23, 1986 3:11 AM
Hmm, "dinkiness" is a ticklish question, isn't it? DX100/27 are pretty amazing compared to all home computers' built-in sound guts so far. DX100/27 is on a par with Casio CZ-101, Yamaha FB-01, etc. DX-100/27 is dinky compared with DX7, Emulator II, Mirage, digital reverbs, etc. DX-100/27 is miniscule vis-a-vis Kurzweil, Fairlight, Synclavier. I've worked with people who own all of these horrible noisemakers, and my immediate co-workers are on the DX7/Emulator II level, so YES, within the context of the kinds of synthesizers I'm used to using (when I use synthesizers, which is NOT always!!), the DX100/27 is/are dinky. No offense intended; just a question of what one's used to.
#36837From: MARC LIMATAOct 20, 1986 9:45 PM
Do you think the DX100/27 are dinky ??
#36786From: Chris GriggOct 20, 1986 2:52 AM
I stand corrected, it must have been a CZ-1 I played. I agree: if you wanted to buy a dinky synth, you should look at the CZ101, DX100, and DX27.
#36858From: Deanna LobdellOct 20, 1986 11:36 PM
Right. I just got my DX27. To go multi-timbrel I plan to add some FB01s. One soon, more later. And that ensoniq I mentioned last message eventually. -Dee
#36859From: Deanna LobdellOct 20, 1986 11:39 PM
Wait – the way I got stuck in the mesage pile it looks like I'm agreeing that the DX27 is dinky. I don't think so – it beats the CZ101 and 1000. Dee
#36859From: Deanna LobdellOct 20, 1986 11:39 PM
Wait – the way I got stuck in the mesage pile it looks like I'm agreeing that the DX27 is dinky. I don't think so – it beats the CZ101 and 1000. Dee
#36970From: MARC LIMATAOct 22, 1986 8:31 PM
In my last reply I mention the AKAI X7000 sampler/keyboard , you should check that one out before the Ensoniq Marc
#37003From: Deanna LobdellOct 22, 1986 11:54 PM
Marc I'm not really interested in a sampler right now – I want a setup like you've got, with an analog synth (your Korg) and some Yamaha stuff. I've got a DX27 now, I'd like to get the Ensoniq ESQ-1 as an analog synth and some FB-01s like you've got. Have you heard the ESQ-1? I think it has a fatter sound with more variety (3 oscillators) than the Korg. Dee
#37337From: MARC LIMATAOct 25, 1986 9:49 PM
Its hard to tell which synth is better. I still like a lot of the sounds on the Roland Alpha Juno 2 better than either the ESQ-1 or Korg. The Korg digital delay and built in arpeggiator are nice added bonuses and the Korg is about $300-$400 less than the ESQ-1 which about covers the price of an FB01. Synthesizers are about the same in flexibility in a given price range . It is really up to you and to determine what you like . I personally like the Roland and Korg for analog style synths. Some people like the CASIO CZ-1 , others think the KAWAI K-3 is one of the best deals around. You have a difficult desicion! Good Luck Marc
#37337From: MARC LIMATAOct 25, 1986 9:49 PM
Its hard to tell which synth is better. I still like a lot of the sounds on the Roland Alpha Juno 2 better than either the ESQ-1 or Korg. The Korg digital delay and built in arpeggiator are nice added bonuses and the Korg is about $300-$400 less than the ESQ-1 which about covers the price of an FB01. Synthesizers are about the same in flexibility in a given price range . It is really up to you and to determine what you like . I personally like the Roland and Korg for analog style synths. Some people like the CASIO CZ-1 , others think the KAWAI K-3 is one of the best deals around. You have a difficult desicion! Good Luck Marc
#37003From: Deanna LobdellOct 22, 1986 11:54 PM
Marc I'm not really interested in a sampler right now – I want a setup like you've got, with an analog synth (your Korg) and some Yamaha stuff. I've got a DX27 now, I'd like to get the Ensoniq ESQ-1 as an analog synth and some FB-01s like you've got. Have you heard the ESQ-1? I think it has a fatter sound with more variety (3 oscillators) than the Korg. Dee
#36970From: MARC LIMATAOct 22, 1986 8:31 PM
In my last reply I mention the AKAI X7000 sampler/keyboard , you should check that one out before the Ensoniq Marc
#36858From: Deanna LobdellOct 20, 1986 11:36 PM
Right. I just got my DX27. To go multi-timbrel I plan to add some FB01s. One soon, more later. And that ensoniq I mentioned last message eventually. -Dee