CompuServe Thread

#A2000 Rev 6.x bugs!!!

24 messages in this thread
#68271From: David MartinOct 4, 1989 9:08 PM
ALL Revision 6.x owners: I'm tired of the conflicting bull-BLEEP I am hearing about the A2000's revision 6.x motherboards. I have one that is proving to be a real pain. I am currently unable to add expansion peripherals to the computer making it utterly useless. I am told by my dealer that there is nothing wrong with my computer, but there is! It doesn't work. I have tried only one expansion product so far. The 8 UP! ram expander from Microbotics would not work. Microbotics is blaming CBM for the problems and I don't know who to believe. If you are suffering the same problems please share your method of fixing the problem with me. I certainly like to get this do nothing sitting on my desk to work. We are going to try another brand of expansion to find out what happens with it. I will post the results here within the next few weeks. If anyone has info on this problem please share it with the rest of us! Thanks!
#68283From: Ben A LottOct 4, 1989 9:52 PM
That's wierd, Ihave a rev 6.1 with a gvp 46 meg drive and 2058 board that works fine. I've also installed in other 6.1 & 6.0 machines supra ram, and hard disks with no hitch. Your machine or the board must be defective. Oh I also just installed a Live! 2000 no problem. Ben
#68328From: Mike Roth/LatticeOct 5, 1989 1:31 PM
The only bug I've heard about with 6.x boards is that 8 UP! won't work with them. The problem I've heard is that the new motherboard memory puts a spike on the bus that only the 8 UP! has trouble with. If anyone knows anything else, I'd like to hear it. — Mike Roth
#68429From: David MartinOct 5, 1989 11:44 PM
6.x problem: I've been told that a fix for Rev 6.x boards is available. It involves a patch to the motherboard or in some cases total replacement of the board itself. Contact your service center for info. I got this info indirectly from the Service manager at CBM via someone in another department.
#68551From: Rick MoyerOct 6, 1989 8:26 PM
Well, I've been following a thread on the "other" network for some time about this problem. There is indeed a problem with :some:, note I said :some:, not all, revision 6. 0-6.1 motherboards. The problem can manifest itself with some rev.6.0-6.1 boards and not others. But, in almost all cases, the problem is associated with just about -any- type of DMA activity on the bus, not just the 8-up! board. C='s own cntroller cards have occasionally failed, as have the bridgeboards, and several other 3rd party cards. After calling around the country to several dealers, and manufacturers, they've all stated that they've had problems, some more than others. Microbotics, however, does seem to be experiencing the highest failure rates of anyone,(according to inside sources at CATS), therefore C= has'nt -officially- announced there is a problem, and for the moment, they seem to think this -may- be more of a Microbotics problem than a Commodore problem. Microbotics has sent West Chester several of there cards from their product line for testing and nothing conclusive has resulted as of yet,(or at least that I know of…) I took my rev.6.1 board to GVP and tried one of their hardcards after experiencing problems with an HF2000/Qunatum hardcard, and GVP's worked flawlessly, even withn 8-UP! ram eaxpansion in the next slot. It turned out that I had a defective HardFrame, and my problem was not 6.1 related. Two of the engineers at GVP informed me that they too have some problems, with 6.0-6.1 revisions, but only occasionally, and nowhere near the degree some other manufacturers, most noticably Microbotics, have had. This -may- be due to the fact that the GVP SCSI controller is not a fully DMA type controller,(It is DMA up until the on-board 16k ram cache, but their card never takes control of the DMA channel). I've been talking to Joanne Dow about this problem, also, and she is supposedly keeping close tabs on this as well. If I hear any more from her about this, I'llpost it here. Anyway, I've been running my 6.1 revision 2000 for 5 weeks now, with a GVP/ Quantum prodrive105s hardcard and an 8-UP! board, populated with 4 megs, with
#68553From: Rick MoyerOct 6, 1989 8:33 PM
-no- problems whatsoever. However, I ordered another 2000 from C= about 3 week ago, and it took them about 2 weeks to ship it to them….they're only 45 minutes from West Chester. When it arrived, I discovered that it had a revision 6.2 motherboard in it. Maybe this revision is "fixed"????
#68564From: David MartinOct 6, 1989 9:14 PM
Rick….a release of a bug fix for 6.x boards has been released by CBM. Authorized service centers should have the information in hand anytime now. My dealer cantacted CBM and was told the fix was in the newest release of the tech notes. If anyone sees this document share the fix and symptoms with us. Iwas told it involves a patch to fix the board or worst case a board swap. I'd perfer a board swap at this point..as mine is really a BAD 6.0 computer!!! It didn't work with 2 8 up!'s we tried, but did ok with a CBM 2 meg card..oh the confusion.
#68704From: Rick MoyerOct 7, 1989 4:00 PM
David….I'm aware of the bug fix with 6.0-6.1. Supposedly it involveschange of a certain brand 68000 chip. Seems C= was using Sinetics 68000 and are adviing changing to a different 68000 chip. Apparently I was correct about this being the hold up on delivery of my 6.2 rev. 2000, also.
#68710From: Gregory B. TibbsOct 7, 1989 7:00 PM
Gee, I recommended changing the 68000 last week and was questioned for it. :-). -Greg
#68758From: David MartinOct 7, 1989 11:29 PM
Why would a wacky 68000 chip cause problems with expansion devices? My A2000 works fine without expansion. Also what or how do they describe the symptoms?
#68848From: John DraperOct 8, 1989 3:08 PM
David, The 68000 chip drives a lot of things fairly directly, and there isn't much room for any flakiness in the chip. Slow signals, low drive capability, and so on, are all causes for problems with expansion devices. -larry
#68954From: Gregory B. TibbsOct 9, 1989 8:09 AM
Not slow signals… Way too fast signals with 2 volt under and over shoot! and 3.6 nanosecond rise/fall times.
#69470From: Mike HobartOct 13, 1989 12:34 AM
There are manufacturing variations between different vendor's versions of THE SAME CHIP! This is unfortunately not uncommon in the electronics industry. It can be quite revealing to look at the actual published specs of a chip, particularly the timing or loading tolerances. All too often engineers can get spoiled by using a good manufacturer's chips and pushing them to the limit. Then someone decides to switch to another vendor with a lower priced chip that meets that published spec but may be far beyond what had been delivered by the first manufacturer (in fact). I've seen this several times in cases where research instruments are developed by a careful engineer in a lab environment, then are turned over to someone else to produce at a lower cost – not even the 'lowest bidder' of legend. Sigh … Mike
#68432From: Steve GrandonaOct 5, 1989 11:52 PM
David, When I upgraded to an A2000 I bought an adaptor for my StarBoard (Microbotics). I was running a 2090 controller for my hard drive. I have one of the early 2000s (german). I tested the Starboard at my local computer store and all was well. Microbotics had me send the card and adaptor to them. They had just received a german 2000 and would check out the problem. According to them the 2090 did not pass a signal that it should have. They modified the adaptor board and sent it back. All I paid was shipping. I was quite happy with their support and would tend to believe there side of the story. Good Luck, Steve
#68563From: John DraperOct 6, 1989 9:07 PM
Steve, They said the 2090 did not pass a signal it should have, yet they modified their adapter. Hmmm… sounds like the problem was in their adapter. I am running a ComSpec controller downstream form the 2909, and have no problems at all. -larry
#68435From: Ethan SolomitaOct 5, 1989 11:55 PM
David, most likely, as 8 up appears to be the product that is causing the problem, Microbotics didn't follow the rules. I can't say that for a fact but that seems to be a continuous problem. — Ethan
#68543From: David MartinOct 6, 1989 8:09 PM
Ethan: Well who knows since CBM has released some form of repair for A2000's with the Rev 6.x mother boards (at least for my 6.0) in the neewest tech notes going out to service centers even as we speak. I'm told it involves a patch on the board or at worst case a board swap. I will keep everyone informed after my dealer receives the tech notes and looks at and repairs my A2000. I hope something good comes of this! As for Microbotics…everyone I talk to agreees that their products may not be perfect….but is anything? I'm told of a high failure rate can anyone verify this?? David PS…OI'm looking forward to getting my A2000 fixed!
#68889From: Mark D. ManesOct 8, 1989 8:12 PM
I just heard from a very good source that the Rev 6 boards suffered because of a bad lot of 68000 chips Commodore bought. I understand all you need to do is replace it (free at authorized dealers) and your Amiga will start making things possible again 🙂 -mark=
#68904From: David MartinOct 8, 1989 9:17 PM
Well I should know soon about whether my Amiga will start making things possible again. Stay tuned…
#69471From: Mike HobartOct 13, 1989 12:42 AM
I also ran into a problem with my Microbotics 8-up board and a rev 6 motherboard. I have a tale too long to tell about certain dealers (great guys in the service dept but bozos in the rest of the organization). Anyway I had also talked to Microbotics and they knew about it at the time, but said that they were waiting for CBM to ship them a rev 6 motherboard. When I suggested that they might just try going to a dealer and buying one, they seemed to think it was unreasonable. Their answer in July was that I would just have to wait….. I hope to get a working memory board from the dealer RSN (I started this at the beginning of JULY!). At least now I've got the tech dept at the dealer handling it themselves, so I should actually have it in a couple of days. Times to try men's souls…. Mike
#69580From: David MartinOct 13, 1989 10:15 PM
I was so happy that my 8 UP! works that I'm buying an 80 meg scsi drive w/ a kronos or Hardframe card. My a2000 works fine now.
#69855From: Mike HobartOct 15, 1989 6:17 PM
I am very happy with my HardFrame controller, it's been working like a charm. It looks like I've got things straightened out with my dealer [finally!!!]. It will be nice to be operating with more memory again! Mike
#69859From: David MartinOct 15, 1989 7:40 PM
Mike…since my a2000 is fixed I have decided to purchase a hard drive and controller. I have decided to purchase the Kronos card for the A2000 and a 100 meg quantum hard drive. I REALLY need the hard disk since I'm beginning to see a need for such an item. I have 3 megs and would like to add a 68020/30 card soon.
#68554From: Rick MoyerOct 6, 1989 8:36 PM
Ethan, the 8-UP! board is defiitely NOT the cause of the 6.0-6.1 problem….BELIEVE me… -Rick