CompuServe Thread

Targa vs ATvista

4 messages in this thread
#3931From: Rick MillerOct 4, 1991 3:56 PM
I am trying to decide on a frame buffer, maybe the Targa+ or the ATvista board for rendering single frame animations to S-VHS tape. The animations will be used in a courtroom setting and shown on at least a 27" monitor. It seems like I saw a Compuserve message that didn't like the decoding quality of the Targa. For that matter maybe there is a frame buffer by someone else that is just as good?? The video side of computer animation is all new to me, HELP!! Please respond if you have an opinion on frame buffers. Rick Miller
#4207From: John Sergneri [ADESK]Oct 9, 1991 10:37 AM
The Targa+ will provide great output to SVHS but only in conjunction with an animation controller. The VideoVGA may be more of what you want, lower quality but still quite acceptable for SVHS. What applications will you be using for the animation? Animator PRO or 3D Studio? What brand of SVHS deck? This effects which card to buy. John
#4280From: Rick MillerOct 10, 1991 1:45 PM
The animation will be used in the courtroom, such as car accidents, structual failures in buildings and so on. This will require an animation controller and a frame accurate VTR. The only VTR's in my price range that I know about are the JVC BRS-811U or the Panasonic AG-7750, what do you think. I will be renerding to tape with no copies needing to be made and no editing, will I need the Panasonic with the TBC or will the JVC work just fine? Since the Targa+ has VGA pass-through will it replace my video card I now use? After I decide on the frame buffer I still have to pick the model 16, 16/32 or 64, and food for thought on this subject? Video is certainly not my forte, so, if any of my thoughts look like I'm going astray just say so, Please!!! At this point I'm only researching the possibility of going into business doing the forensic animation and I have limited experience with animation? This is why I'm asking so many questions. How useful would the Pro Animator be, special effects are usually NOT wanted in the courtroom? I know it could be used for creating material for mapping, but I think I can buy those kinds of things and probably will higher quality than I can create. Will Autodesk allow an individual to sell Animator to another individual? I ask this because I know soneone that world sell and until October 31 I could update to Pro Animator for $195, but I have to act fairly fast. If I can buy the animator would it be handled thru the Autodesk dealer or Autodesk? I'm sorry if I have rambled on so much that you can't do your job if you attempt to answer this messge!!! THANKS very much for your time!! Rick
#4295From: CSA/CAOct 10, 1991 8:14 PM
Rick, (no, I'm not John). The Panasonic is preferred, and will probably hold up better. While the Targa+ has VGA pass-thru for a single-monitor solution, this still requires a separate VGA card. The VGA portion is not recordable to video (unless passed through from a Truevision VideoVGA). In addition, almost everybody uses (and Truevision recommends) a 2-monitor setup, which you'd need for 3D Studio anyway. If you're not doing any video effects, such as snap transitions, etc. the Targa+ 16/32 would be great, giving you 24-bit color and 8-bit video blend effects. The Targa+ 64 is of greater value in other forms of video production, not for animation. Kevin Krell – Computer Support Associates