CompuServe Thread

Mac Video

7 messages in this thread
#1288From: Tim BrillDec 29, 1994 7:43 PM
I recently received a catelog in the mail called MacMall. In it they have a Power Mac 8100/80 AV. It states that the AV version comes with video capture and the ability to record video out to video tape. The AV version is only about $200 more than the Mac with out the AV upgrade. Would this AV version be any good for making training films and other non-broadcast materials? I am a PC user, but am thinking of making the Power Mac leap, so I don't know much about Macs.
#1387From: Steve Bennett/SYSOPDec 31, 1994 7:03 PM
Tim, While I am not familiar with that particular equipment, I would have to say that for $200 youu could hardly go wrong. Worst case you will be able to learn what you do want out of a real video production system. -John
#1438From: Bob RoitblatJan 2, 1995 9:01 AM
The AV model is capable of Video and Audio capture. It does not use as good of a compression routine as the Radius VideoVision Studio board. If all you are doing is 2 to 5 minute pieces, the AV would probably work. -Bob
#1450From: Tim BrillJan 2, 1995 2:48 PM
Why only 2-5 minute pieces? Is that just because of disk space? What software comes with the AV model, is it Adobe? What type of system do you have? Thanks for your help! Tim
#1479From: Bob RoitblatJan 3, 1995 4:36 PM
There is a two to five minute limit becuase of the lack of adequate compression. The AV does not come with any edit software, such as Adobe Premiere. I have a PowerMac 8100 with 72MB of RAM, a 1GB internal drive and a 3GB external. I use a Radius VideoVision 2.0 capture/compression card and edit using Logo Motion, Photoshop and Adobe Premiere 4.0. I use a Sony Vdeck hi-8 VCR, a Sony 3/4" Umatic VTR and a JVC VHS VCR for input/output. My source material was either shot on film and transfered to tape or shot on hi-8 tape. What else would you like to know? -Bob
#1499From: Tim BrillJan 3, 1995 7:50 PM
There seems to be more people who us PCs for video capture, editing, etc… but if you ask any serious user they will tell you the Mac is the best. Why don't you see more people using Mac? Is it because of the price?
#1501From: Bob RoitblatJan 3, 1995 8:53 PM
Maybe from your perspective there are more people using PCs to do video. Avid and Media Composer, two of the best selling Digital Video edit stations are Mac based. And I believe VideoVision outsells all other video capture boards. I suspect most people who now use their PCs for digital editing do so becuase they had a PC for some other purpose and evolved their computer to editing. People who did not have a computer and wanted to get into editing purchased a Mac. My company literally has hundreds of computers. No one has ever asked to make a PC do digital editing. It's always Macintosh. The editing programs, like Premiere, run under Windows on a PC. Windows is a DOS enhancement program. Basically, you have to run two programs to edit on a PC. Premiere (for example) and Windows. Assuming you have similarly powered computers, the Macintosh would run faster because you have only one program running. The Macintosh has always been a graphics based computer. It was designed to run graphics and graphic based programs. The Mac is much more popular for Digital Video.