CompuServe Thread

#FC II

12 messages in this thread
#44952From: SoftWoodOct 2, 1992 8:42 PM
Jonathan, Actually there are no immediate plans to support HotLinks. If enough of our users want it, we will do it. I still would like to know how you plan to use HotLinks with lets say ProWrite. Can you give me a couple of examples of what you want to do? Thanks, Woody
#44969From: Andy BlazerOct 3, 1992 3:06 AM
Woody, I would like to also request that SoftWood support HotLinks on the Amiga. I have got Pagestream V2.2 and have closely followed reviews/articles regarding HotLinks. I do not as yet have HotLinks but soon intend purchasing HotLinks Editions 1.1. Firstly Woody, a user does not need to own Pagestream to reap the benefits of HotLinks. The way I understand it is that HotLinks is a stand-alone program which works on the Dynamic Data Exchange principle. I think you have to own Hotlinks to use HotLinks in other programs. Even so, it is not expensive and surely you can see that it will be great for users and the Amiga platform in general. Finally we will have real multitasking programs all using the same formats for text/graphics e.t.c. Now one way I could use ProWrite with HotLinks is as follows. Firstly though, I own a Program called GPFax for my Fax/Modem. What I do is type up a document in Prowrite and load up GPFax. GPFax has its own printer driver that redirects output from the printer and prints a fax picture to disk for later transmission. Currently I have to Write my Fax either in ProWrite or PageStream if I want good output. The latter is not preferable because of slow screen updates and general lack of speed on my computers behalf. (A500) If I had Hotlinks I could have a PageStream predefined Fax Template.doc that I would use to link to either ProWrite or the GPFax Fax.document. I could for example write my text in ProWrite then link it into the Pagestream Template or I could go straight to GPFax which in version 3.0 form will support HotLinks. If I make ANY changes to the original text it can be automatically updated in the HOTLINKED files as well, saving the user heaps of time. Now, SoftLogik in the U.S. will offer the HotLinks developer pack free to any developers wishing to implement HotLinks. Call SoftLogik. Woody, don't get your nose out of joint, think I'm being cheeky or badmouthing you, but You (SoftWood) really must support this as it is <continued>
#45001From: SoftWoodOct 3, 1992 7:58 PM
FinalCopy works great with programs like GPFax. All you have to do is create your document in FinalCopy and direct its output to GPFax. Not only is the quality of the fax excellent, but you don't need several different programs to do it. Now, don't get me wrong. I am not saying that HotLinks is not a good thing. I am simply looking for some examples of things that other programs do now that they have HotLinks support, that FinalCopy can't already do. I don't mind adding HotLinks support to our program, but I don't want it to be the kind of feature that you put in just to say you've got it. There are several other VERY important features that we are currently working on that seem to be more important for a word processor to have than HotLinks. Maybe we need to add HotLinks to our list of new features. If I do, I would like to know real examples of benefits for doing so. Woody
#45057From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiOct 4, 1992 7:50 PM
Let me put one vote in for stuff like footnotes/endnotes, indexing, table of contents generation, and R/W compatibility with PC word processors being MUCH more vital than Hotlinks. HotLinks support would be nice, but those other features, IMHO, would be a lot more useful to a lot of people.
#45065From: Brian CowanOct 4, 1992 9:58 PM
The best example I can think of is this: — You create a document with embedded graphics. — When you're done, you delete the original grraphic files. Since they are stored in the document, this isn't a major problem, until… — You are revising said document, and need to make changes to the graphic elements in the file. (As far as I know, DPaint IV doesn't do clipboarding….) Brian — Cruising on AutoPilot….. Hopefully sparing the wallet some bruising…:^)
#44970From: Andy BlazerOct 3, 1992 3:07 AM
already being implemented widely thru the Amiga community. We really need to have JUST ONE format for this sort of thing to show those PC dummies just what the Amiga can do. I feel that if you dont support HotLinks, and don't take this as a threat please, your programs will be left behind on the Scrap heap. (and they definitely don't belong there!!!) Also, could you please chase up a technical support request regarding FC1.3.2 and my GSX-140 Citizen Printer I sent to Terrance Wright via CIS EMAIL. Haven't received a reply yet and the problem is really bugging me. Hope I didn't offend you with my 2 cents worth. Just wanted to let you know how it can and will be used by me when I get it. Regards, Andy Blazer (AUSTRALIA) – KLINGONS off the starboard bow! – "ENGAGE AUTOPILOT"
#44980From: SyndesisOct 3, 1992 1:41 PM
Uhm, those PC dummies already have OLE and DDE under Windows, and it's much more prevalent there than HotLinks in the Amiga market. What were you going to show them?
#45066From: Brian CowanOct 4, 1992 9:58 PM
OLE is all well and good, but I don't think that an OLE embedded graphic can be printed out in a document…… Brian — Cruising on AutoPilot….. Hopefully sparing the wallet some bruising…:^)
#45080From: SyndesisOct 5, 1992 10:23 AM
No, printing is supported under OLE. Printing under Windows is no different than drawing to the screen. You can also query to find if the destination device is a PostScript printer, etc. and send something different, such as a more high-resolution image.
#45081From: Andy BlazerOct 5, 1992 10:44 AM
It's good to see the IBM have taken the AMIGA's lead! Run a top shelf Amiga500 word-processor and a top-shelf IBM Windows WP in a 1 MEG environment on a 386/40 and the Amiga still is just as good. While the PC has been advancing over the last few years <Unfortunately> the Amiga hasn't. But things will be changing soon…… Nah Nah Nah Nah Regards Andy.
#44978From: Wayne SteeleOct 3, 1992 1:15 PM
I cast my vote for HotLinks support in FinalCopy! Wayne Steele Saving $ with AutoPilot
#45020From: Jonathan BlackwellOct 4, 1992 1:08 AM
As I see it, more and more people are going to be supporting HotLinks… It would be another nicety to have in FC. Also, GPFAX is supposed to support HotLinks directly. Other major programs not yet named will also be supporting HotLinks. I just don't think that SoftWood would wnat to be left out on this one. The developers tools are free from what I understand and easy to implement. You guys should seriously look at it. -Jonathan