CompuServe Thread

Screen Capture to .AVI?

13 messages in this thread
#193From: Remy MartinDec 17, 1994 10:47 AM
I am looking for an alternative to Lotus Screencam for capturing "live" computer screen activity and mouse movement to either an .AVI or .MOV file. Is there any software out there that does this? I was thinking of feeding the video output from one computer through a VGA to TV converter, then back into the video capture board of a second computer. This seems like a lot of trouble and I am concerned there would be a unsatisfactory loss of quality. Any thoughts on the matter greatly appreciated. Remy
#369From: Bryan HiltonDec 20, 1994 12:25 PM
Hi Remy, VFW1.1 has a utilitie in it that does just what you are looking for. You simply turn it on and it captures all screen movements into an .avi file. I have only played with it a little as I havent had any use for it so far. Cheers BH
#377From: IAN WALKERDec 20, 1994 2:19 PM
I've used the screen capture to AVI utility quite a bit – it works well but you need quite a bit of processing power especially if you want to capture a multimedia application as it is running (I used this to create demonstrations for use in on line help within a touch screen kiosk type apllication – it works OK bur you are limited to 3 or 4 frames a second (Pentium 90/32 Megs RAM!)
#1262From: Merrill, LaurenDec 29, 1994 11:46 AM
Hi Remy- Sorry, I don't have any answers for you, but I'm in the same boat. Have you heard of a program called … CameraMan (I think?)? It sounds like it might do the screen capture, but I'm not sure, so don't want to spend the money yet. If you find anything that works well, I'd appreciate you passing it on… THANKS! Lauren Merrill MERILab, Inc.
#1308From: Timothy LiebeDec 30, 1994 11:02 AM
Merrill, Lauren: >Have you heard of a program called … CameraMan (I think?)? It sounds like it might do the screen capture, but I'm not sure, so don't want to spend the money yet.< HiJaak (don't remember the co. offhand) also does screen captures (at least to .TIF or .BMP formats), and from there you can import it to .AVI format (if you're doing stills, at least). As for capturing sequences, I'm not sure if it does that yet… Hope this helps, Tim Liebe
#1329From: Merrill, LaurenDec 30, 1994 3:55 PM
Hi Tim! Thanks for the tip. Actually, we have HiJaak, but I've never used it for that purpose. I guess I need to take a better look at it. However, I *am* more interested in the sequences for training purposes, so I'll keep looking. As usual, the endless search for the perfect software program… Thanks again! -Lauren
#1340From: Patrick HiebertDec 30, 1994 6:19 PM
I use the screen capture that comes with Video for Windows 1.1 quite a lot. It works very well for our purposes. We've created a promotional package and some training material with it for a software product we have developed. It works well for that. It creates good AVI files of whatever size you want in however many colors your screen driver is. We then OLE them into PowerPoint and have a compact little presentation of the system.
#1470From: Merrill, LaurenJan 3, 1995 9:14 AM
Thanks for the reply, Patrick! Do you use it just to get a "screen dump" screen-by-screen? Ultimately, I'd like to be able to "film" the correct sequence through the screens. For instance, show the main menu, then the arrow-cursor moving up to File, then down to Save, then show the Save dialog, etc. Do you know if this is possible with Video for Windows 1.1? Thanks again! –Lauren
#1812From: Ian FirthJan 11, 1995 12:57 PM
Lauren, Go WINMM and ask for a copy of Jumpstart. VfW is no longer sold, but Jumpstart contains the developer kit. It's also free. Ian Diversions Software
#2059From: Timothy LiebeJan 16, 1995 1:27 PM
Lauren: >Thanks for the tip. Actually, we have HiJaak, but I've never used it for that purpose. I guess I need to take a better look at it. However, I *am* more interested in the sequences for training purposes, so I'll keep looking.< Sorry it took me so long to get back to you–I've been away for a few weeks undergoing deadline hell <g>… I see that other folks had other solutions that might fit your needs better than HiJaak (VfW 1.1 sounds like it'd work better for your needs than my suggestion, BTW). Also, in the "simple-stupid" department, have you considered simply videotaping the sequence off the screen and using that? It's not as slick or exotic as a software solution, but it may just do you the job… Tim
#2563From: Dave EbertFeb 3, 1995 4:33 AM
Adobe Primiere 4.0 can grab your screen action direct to .avi files on a PC. You can edit these a million different ways and convert to MAC .mov format as well. This product it a giant leap forward from version 1.1 and in the deluxe CD version what you'll see is stunning results.
#2577From: Timothy LiebeFeb 3, 1995 8:29 AM
Dave: >Adobe Primiere 4.0 can grab your screen action direct to .avi files on a PC.< Thanks for the tip! But will it work with, say, my Intel Smart Video Recorder Pro–or with other under $2,000 video capture cards? Tim
#2609From: Dave EbertFeb 4, 1995 2:13 AM
Sure should work would be my answer, so long as your board is MCI driven would I think. On my computer I have three video boards installed: Video Blaster SE – for video overlays Media Visions Pro Movie Spectrum – video capture and Roctec RocGen Pro – that ports video through a Tseng ET4000 – Genlock (Felt like a wizzard when I figured out how to cram all they boards together into my machine! and they all work fine with all my software. Only one small quirk seems to be with Video Director 2.0 can't seem to acquire Picons properly, but can work around this with Video for Windows 1.1 single frame captures.) When I want to do animations and\or morphs it helps to pull out the Tseng ET4000 and swap to an Orchid Fahrenheit Vesa Local Buss SVGA board and that I use with an external video encoder. In fact, the encoder is also connected to the Tseng board. So depending on what the effect is I am trying to pull off there is more than one avenue to either output or input – and after I evaluate the results it's a matter of sellecting the best means available. But anyway, my answer would be that the software is not a problem in this matter. Hardware does it's thing, software makes it shine. You often get what you pay for, ie. things work together but each has it's limits that the other can not overcome. The most expensive video boards are meaningless if you have a sloppy monitor, etc. Always motivated to upgrade – so long as you are moving forward right?