#Best Word Proc. 4 Ami???
6 messages in this thread
Basically, it comes down to Final Writer 3 or Wordworth 3.1. I have both
of them, though I have a lot more experience with Softwood's stuff (Final ___)
since I've been with them since Final Copy 1.3.
Final Writer's implementation is very solid – I've basically never crashed
because of Softwood's products, but in some regards it's not fully system
standard and compliant. For example, it uses its own bitmapped font which you
can't change for menus, title bars, and the like, whereas WW is pretty much
completely selectable. Both use the display database. For readability
onscreen, I'd say Wordworth wins out. For text layout features, FiW wins hands
down – it has layout style tags and the like, which are sadly missing in WW.
Otoh WW looks more polished and has more of other kinds of features. It
has a niftier looking and feeling interface. So far, although I haven't delved
in all the way, WW's features all seem to be there. Both programs increase the
fragmentation of memory, which is a real problem. I'm not yet sure, but I
think WW might actually use a little more CHIP MEM, but I may be wrong on that.
If you have any specific questions I'll be happy to answer them; I don't
want to go on and on about what you might not even be interested in. In short,
though, it's a tough choice and depends on what you're doing. For highly
formatted documents, FiW wins hands down as I said. Oh – another BIG lack in
WW is NO AREXX, not even any macros at all. For certain other tasks, like
letters, fiction, what have you, WW might win because of better screen
readability and a slight edge in some features. Also, FiW supports its own
NimbusQ font format as well as PS Type 1 and CompuGraphic; whereas WW supports
the Amiga's bitmapped fonts (!?) as well as Type 1 and Compugraphic and, more
importantly, TrueType fonts, and internal printer fonts, although someone tells
me that last feature isn't complete yet. (Soft-Logik's TypeSmith can load but
not save NimbusQ format fonts, so you can convert them to other formats.)
Paul – wearing my black construction paper funeral suit
Thanks for the info. Do both convert files to WordPerfect format?
C. Davey
Nope, only Wordworth. It looks to me like Wordworth might wind up being the
better program, in some later release, but now it's a draw leaning towards
Final Writer.
Paul – wearing my black construction paper funeral suit
No. Only Wordworth can export text in WordPerfect format. It exports in 5.1
format. It can also export in RTF and ASCII. Final Writer can only export in
ASCII.
Wordworth can also import MS Write/Works/WordForDOS/WordPerfect5.1/RTF and
WordStar formats.
Cheers,
Michael @ Soft-Logik Publishing
>Wordworth can also import MS Write/Works/WordForDOS/WordPerfect5.1/RTF and
>WordStar formats.
That's a big plus in it's favor, for me. Is there an update in the works that
might go to WordPerfect 6.x?
Thanks for you input BYW, it's all I really got.
C. Davey
WordPerfect 6: maybe, but that's not all that important, since WP6 can save out
in WP5 format, and the formats are very similar. WP6 can load WP5 as well.
Cheers,
Michael @ Soft-Logik Publishing