CompuServe Thread

#VistaPro

19 messages in this thread
#116298From: Donald GrossSep 28, 1993 9:15 PM
John, In my opinion those display manufacturers should provide enthusiastic support to all software developers. It's the software that makes the hardware run. I believe that Opal Tech will provide that support if asked. They are helping Impulse provide OpalVision support for Imagine. I have owned every version of Vistapro since it came out & I love it. The clouds are outstanding on OpalVision. Have you guys considered a CD-Rom of landscapes? I think that would be a big money maker for you. You'd be surprised how well CD-Rom's are selling. Ask the venders. ———————————————-Don- via Whap!
#116374From: John HinkleySep 29, 1993 2:49 AM
Don, I think Opal did offer a board a while back — but Clint was too busy at the time. His priority at the time was to get all the AGA modes working. Having been a hardware developer myself I know that you get tons of request from "developers, reviewers and beta testers" for free samples — you have to pick and choose since you can't afford to send free product to everyone who asks. And early on there's usually a shortage of boards and your cash-poor so you need to ship to _paying_ customers. Vistapro has a reputation as a product that can take good advantage of 24 bit video so most manufactures have been willing to supply samples. Some of the boards that were given to VRLI in the past include DCTV, HAME, Toaster, and FireCracker24. Actually, NewTek supplied a toaster but wouldn't tell us how to program it so nothing much came of that except that we changed the default overscan image height to 482 since the Toaster didn't like 484. I believe that there's a library now that you can use to talk to the Toaster? Anyway, now is the time for all you manufactures (if you're reading this) to send VRLI sample boards if you want support in VP4! Don't wait until the last minute… Once I started using 24 bit video (FireCracker24 at the time) I couldn't stand looking at a regular Amiga or PC screen anymore! A CD-ROM is seriously in the works right now. It will officially be a CD-ROM version of VP3 for the PC, but since it's ISO-9660 compliant, you'll be able to read the DEM files (thousands of 'em) from the Amiga too. As usual, Vistapro owners will be eligible for a low priced upgrade to the CD-ROM when it's available. Thanks for your enthusiastic support over the years! John.
#116390From: Clint Woeltjen@VRLISep 29, 1993 6:38 AM
John: I'll be sending letters out just as soon as I get a breather between VistaLite, VistaPro Warp, my own programs (GeoForge, Fridae) and a possible VistaPro 3.1 interem release. At least I don't get bored very easily! <grin> (But hopefully I will get boards easily. <ducking>) Clint <VRLI><Chaocity>
#116417From: Ron LegroSep 29, 1993 2:25 PM
Yeah, I use the latest Amiga version of Vista with DCTV and am quite happy with the results. I'm pleased that DCTV options show up right in Vista's menus, too. — Ron Legro from Milwaukee via AUTOPILOT (The only way to fly)
#116774From: Donald GrossOct 2, 1993 7:50 PM
John, The news about the CD-Rom is the best thing I've heard in, let's see, well, days. Seriously though, I'll be anxiously awaiting it's release. I wonder if one of my PC emulators will run the PC VistaPro….Nah..Why even bother? A CD-Rom full of dems…Yea. ———————————————-Don- via Whap!
#116812From: John HinkleyOct 3, 1993 3:00 AM
Don, I would be curious to see how fast your PC emulators run Vistapro. You will need a 386 or better (either real hardware or software emulation) and 4MB RAM (actually VP3 PC will run with 2MB RAM but we say 4 to be safe). The CD ROM should be available before Christmas… John.
#116907From: Donald GrossOct 3, 1993 9:47 PM
John, Actually I do have a 486 33 Mhz at work that I can try it on. I could probably do some overnight renders on that machine. The problem would be converting to Amiga graphics modes after the renders. ———————————————-Don- via Whap!
#117006From: John HinkleyOct 4, 1993 5:38 PM
Don, I don't need benchmarks of "real" 486 machines, I know how fast they are. You'll find that a 486-33 runs Vistapro about twice as fast as an A4000. What I'm curious about seeing on the Amiga is how fast the IBM emulators can run Vistapro. Those with real 80×86 processors (bridge cards) should be able to run about the same speed as an equivalent DOS machine. Those that emulate the processor should run about 1/10 to 1/20 that speed — if they can run Vistapro at all. If you get a chance to try out the DOS version on the Amiga, please let me know what you find…. John.
#117243From: Donald GrossOct 6, 1993 11:05 PM
John, To be honest I don't relish the thought of using VistaPro on PCTask but I definitely will for your benefit. ———————————————-Don- via Whap!
#117263From: John HinkleyOct 7, 1993 2:40 AM
Donald, Is PCTask a software PC emulator? I suspect most of the software emulators won't be able to run VP3 since it runs in protected mode and uses the x86's MMU for virtual memory management. If PCTask can run Windows in "enhanced" mode it will probably run VP3 — and vice versa. If you just can't wait to try it out, there's a demo version available in GraphAVen (GO VRLI)! <g> John.
#117487From: Jonathan BlackwellOct 10, 1993 2:07 AM
Interesting note…. From early tests… the PC module for the Emplant is surpassing DX2/66 in many benchmarks. -Jonathan // Amiga online via Autopilot \\// MAC IIcx & 486 emulation via Amiga!
#117498From: John HinkleyOct 10, 1993 3:46 AM
Jonathan, What exactly is the PC module for the Emplant? Is is a software x86 emulator or is is an actual x86 processor? John.
#117557From: Robert ComerOct 10, 1993 4:10 PM
It's mostly a software emulator, though different than other software emulators, that interpret each instrucion, each time it's executed. Emplant translates it all at once, (allowing optimiztion.) It does however use some of the hardware on the emplant board, for other things than translation. Bob Comer — Flying high and fast with my A1200HD'030 on Autopilot! From Cheyenne, Wyoming U.S.A.
#117589From: Mike SchillerOct 11, 1993 12:34 AM
Bob: Is PC emulation available on the Emplant yet? I have an Emplant, and so far havn't seen any available. // -Mike Schiller \X/ AMIGA! On AutoPilot in sunny Fort Lauderdale
#117695From: Robert ComerOct 11, 1993 11:48 PM
Nope, it's not available yet… Bob Comer — Flying high and fast with my A1200HD'030 on Autopilot! From Cheyenne, Wyoming U.S.A.
#118630From: Michael ClarkeOct 18, 1993 6:06 AM
Is the emplant available for the a1200? How long has the PC module been around, and how much? I do a lot of uni work on pc's, and it'd be great to be able to do it at home! The ol' A500 with AT-Once lacks a little in the speed and compatability depts. 🙂 zzzzz….. The Sandman…..
#117667From: Jonathan BlackwellOct 11, 1993 9:14 PM
The PC emulation module for the Emplant like the MAC module is a combination of both hardware and software to do emulation. The PC module will run 386/486 (depending on Motorola CPU speed) emulations in protected mode. It will utilize the Amiga's ISA slots and uses the Emplant's hardware to keep track of hardware interrupts, etc… From early alpha tests, the Emplant on a 25Mhz 040 has a Norton SI rating of about a DX2/66 Intel 486 Overdrive with the PC emulation. No Intel or equivalant processors are used. The emulation will be able to Windows in enhanced mode and will use the various video drivers already used for the MAC emulation for usage in the PC emulation. Sound Blaster is duplicated with Paula. To find out more about it, you're gonna have to talk to Jim Drew of Utilities Unlimited. You are probably doubting this possibility right now. Well, I did as well with the MAC emulation. I am multitasking with the Emplant MAC emulation right now, so my doubts are gone! My 040 A2000 runs the MAC emulation at Quadra 700 speeds! -Jonathan // Amiga online via Autopilot \\// MAC IIcx & 486 emulation via Amiga!
#117708From: John HinkleyOct 12, 1993 3:07 AM
Jonathan, Thanks for the detailed information about the Emplant. Mac emulation is trivial on the Amiga since the Amiga can directly execute Mac programs — all the "emulator" does is replace low level Mac system calls with equivalent Amiga routines. Under these conditions you would expect to see an A4000 run about the same speed as a Quadra — maybe even a little faster since the Amiga can use it's VLSI chips to offload low level graphics and sound from the processor. PC emulation is a completely different story. Unless the Emplant actually has an 80×86 on board, it's likely to run _much_ slower than a real 486. Any claims to the contrary are probably just marketing hype. John.
#117891From: Jonathan BlackwellOct 13, 1993 11:37 PM
MAC emulation may be trivial… but interestingly enough… I am running the emulation and getting Quadra throughput while the CPU is still multitasking running AmigaDOS. Sure, the ROMS of the MAC are mapped out into Amiga memory, but it is much more than that. As for the PC emulation, true x86 functions are translated into 680×0 code. Apparently, a table exists of all low level functions as well as PC BIOS functions on the Emplant hardware. There is more to it, but I believe Jim Drew when he tells me that he can run Windows apps as fast a 486 on an A4000.