CompuServe Thread

#Adesk U talent @ booth

8 messages in this thread
#61856From: David Cohn, CADalystOct 15, 1993 1:00 PM
No, we're on the same page on this. I think the architect will continue to charge the client for the final design presentation regardless of what form it takes. I just don't think the architect will be able to charge any more than he does already simply because the presentation was created with a computer and is in much more detail than what is possible when it is a single, hand-delineated presentation. As for a subscription to CADalyst, we continue to have an increase in attention to 3D Studio and other presentation-type products. The magazine will always be an AutoCAD magazine, however, so the focus is towards ways that these products are being used in conjunction with AutoCAD. There are currently no 3D Studio-specific magazines that I know of. 3D Artist is the closest thing to that right now and we carry a regular column from that in CADalyst at present. Our February issue traditionally focuses on 3D Studio and our book division is about to release a 3D Studio book complete with a CD-ROM, so I think you can expect to see even more 3DS coverage in CADalyst in the months to come. If you contact the publisher, you might be able to take advantage of the 4-month free trial subscription they were just offering here at Autodesk University. That way you could judge for yourself as to whether there was enough content for a "non-AutoCAD user."
#61901From: ROBERT RITGEROct 15, 1993 7:46 PM
Its so unusual when two people agree on a topic around here.:-) I am hoping that animation will provide our clients with another deliverable service that can be purchased in addition to traditional services. The value of an animation to show before a planning board, zoning board, historic commission, etc. could be so high that it could mean the difference between approval or rejection. We have one client that I'm certain we could have helped retain an even higher percentage of their staff when they moved out of Manhattan to the suburbs if we had produced an animation of their new headquarters. The building we designed was chock full of amenities that aren't easy to show in traditional drawings and models. An animated tour through the building would have charged up their staff for the move. Thanks for the info on CADalyst magazine, I'll try contacting the publisher about the trial subscription. If you can, slip me their number.
#61977From: David Cohn, CADalystOct 16, 1993 1:21 PM
The main CADalyst number (actually for Advanstar Communications) is (503) 343-1200. Please stay in touch. I'm very interested to hear about your successes in bringing CAD and computerized visualization to the Hillier Group. We could probably work together on a story for CADalyst at some point in the future. Perhaps I could even get down to Princeton the next time I come back to New Jersey to visit my family.
#62264From: ROBERT RITGEROct 18, 1993 11:23 PM
Thanks for the phone number. Please don't hesitate to stop in on us in Princeton if you make it back to Jersey. I think I'll be able to give you an update on Friday regarding my progress in bringing animation in-house and into the design process. I have yet another meeting on Thursday to discuss this topic. All indications are quite positive. I cant't tell you what a long, painful, frustrating process this has been. Or, maybe I can. I'd be happy to chat with you any time.
#62517From: David Cohn, CADalystOct 20, 1993 10:56 AM
I'd love to hear about your experiences. I fought similar battles down in Memphis when I was still practicing there.
#61918From: John TissavaryOct 15, 1993 11:03 PM
Could you post the number of Advanstar, please? I was at Adesk U., but couldn't make it to the booth. Had I known about the trial subscription I'd have stopped by, but… .
#61978From: David Cohn, CADalystOct 16, 1993 1:21 PM
No problem. Advanstar's Eugene office is at (503) 343-1200. The offer was for a four month free trial subscription afterwhich you'd have the opportunity to continue as a paid subscriber.
#62001From: John TissavaryOct 16, 1993 8:02 PM
Thanks for the number, David.