CompuServe Thread

#Pleasance's New Amiga

5 messages in this thread
#119989From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiOct 28, 1993 2:09 PM
Everyone thinks they want a RISC processor. They don't. Why? Because. When you change microprocessors, you add an emulation layer whenever you run older software. A 100MHz MIPS RISC machine achieves similar performance to a 16 MHz 386SX when running 16-bit Windows applications under Windows NT. A 100MHz RISC Amiga would likely run older Amiga software at A500-level performance. A1200 if the emulation stuff was done really well and calls to the system software were handled with native RISC code. So you're going to want to buy all native-mode RISC software for the machine to get good performance, rather than taking advantage of the emulation and moving your old Amiga software over. If you're buying all new software anyway, then you're essentially performing a platform switch and you might as well look at all the other options. Suddenly the number of people upgrading drops significantly. A 68060 Amiga would be a much better bet, IMHO, than a RISC machine which wouldn't benefit your older software and would likely cause some compatibility nightmares. IMEO.
#120032From: john bennettOct 28, 1993 11:55 PM
You mean that the Amiga OS can't be pipied to a RISC processor without involving NT? I really wouldn't expect 'older' s/w to run any faster, and I'd be happy to u/g my current power s/w to the next level of h/w. I thoght one of the main things with new CPU's like PowerPC and Alpha were that they could easily and efficiently run older OS's.
#120039From: Robert ComerOct 29, 1993 1:26 AM
What the E stand for in IMEO? And, I totally agree with your post! But unfortunately, for what I want to do, It would be preferable to have the RISC for multiple emulations. (I have to program the "other" machines too.)
#120072From: Ron LegroOct 29, 1993 11:22 AM
PMJI… Interesting comment from the Newtek bosses interviewed in the latest Video Toaster User magazine, to the effect that Commodore is in "far better shape" than Amiga owners realize; that the company has been in these straits before and that new product coming along (unspecified, of course, in the interview) will bolster C='s position. The duo said both Newtek and C= think the Amiga's future at least in the US will be in the desktop video niche. They also their relations with C= are at a high, and the company is making the right moves. Hype? They sounded confident as usual. I agree with you on RISC. The 68040 is a pretty powerful chip, especially when supported with coprocessors. A 68060 ought to provide a platform that's more than enough for most people while providing downward compatibility. That said, "RISC" may become a marketing necessity, just like "Windows." — Ron Legro from Milwaukee via AUTOPILOT (The only way to fly)
#120116From: Jonathan BlackwellOct 29, 1993 10:06 PM
I just got OEM Computing magazine that has an ad from Motorola advertising it's entire line of 68xxxx processors. It showed a chart of how the 68060 outperforms both the Pentium and the PC601. 68xxx machine code benchmarks show an increase of 5x the performance of a 40Mhz 040 with a 25Mhz '060. Very interesting information…. availability Q4CY93 (before years end)