CompuServe Thread

#SetPatch Fails A3000/3.1

14 messages in this thread
#165409From: Dave ArreSep 26, 1994 1:07 AM
Steve: I tried installing 3.1 as you described on the HD, but came up with the same problem as before (the system crashes with a Software Failure at boot-up) The only thing I can do to boot the system is to comment-out the C:SetPatch Quiet line in the Startup sequence. This is VERY puzzling, as it seems nobody else has this problem. I might try using your "super kickstart" file next, but I fear the same thing will happen. I will write another message telling you what the failure message is, maybe you can get an idea of the problem. Talk later — Dave
#165517From: James R. OllickSep 26, 1994 10:36 PM
I have a 4000/040 and get a software failure on bootup, however, if I either cancel it or just let it be, the computer continues to boot. Jim R. Ollick Using AP from Bergenfield, NJ
#165554From: Dave ArreSep 27, 1994 2:51 AM
James: That is interesting. If I let it be, or if I cancel it, the computer cycles through the same thing, always ending in a software failure unless I boot w/ a ss that does not have SetPatch. I think I let it try 3 times before I stopped it. I'm going to download the setpatch file here on CIS and see what the docs say about it, and what version it is. Maybe that'll help. BTW, 3.1 seems to be doing fine, the only beef I have is that the color allocation scheme is screwed up, and I can't use pattern prefs from 2.04. I nixed the MWB demon program because I don't like the default MWB colors on my monitor. I'm glad you mentioned that you get a 'guru' also… I thought I had a nutty machine (or maybe a prototype) for a while! <g> More later…. — Dave
#165608From: Wayne SteeleSep 27, 1994 3:36 PM
Dave: That's a very interesting problem. I do know that the 3.1 SetPatch (v40.16) is compatible with the A3000. It works fine on my souped-up 3000T and a friend's stock 3000. Here's the output from my system: Amiga Operating System Copyright C 1985-1993 Commodore-Amiga, Inc. All Rights Reserved. SetPatch (V40.16) has already been installed. Patch list: 68040 Support Code Loaded Enabled Advanced Graphics Modes graphics/WriteChunkyPixel() patched Memory Pools Enabled data cache I actually started using this version of SetPatch before I upgraded from Workbench 2.1. It worked fine then too, but the patch list was a bit longer. 🙂 Anyway, there must be something unique to your system that makes SetPatch crash. Have you messed with your DMAC/Ramsey settings at all? Do earlier versions (say v37.xx) work on your system? I'm curious because I've never seen an Amiga that crashes SetPatch. As they say, there's a first time for everything… Wayne
#165662From: Dave ArreSep 28, 1994 1:03 AM
Hi, Wayne… thanks for replying & trying to help, looks like I'm going to need some! <g> I tried a few things, and here's what I found: 1) Booted with WB 1.3 floppy. WB V34.34, SetPatch V1.38 Installed; no patch list. Booted Fine. 2) Booted with WB 2.04 floppy, WB V37.67, SetPatch V37.10. Booted, installed fine. PatchList: Enabled Data Cache. 3) Boot with WB 2.04 floppy, with SetPatch V37.38. System crashes. Exactly the same as the 3.1 floppy. 4) Boot with WB 3.1 floppy, SetPatch V40.14 crashes, V40.16 crashes. 5) Boot from HD, WB 3.1, SetPatch V40.16 System Crashes. So, it seems any SetPatch higher than V37.10 crashes my system… if only I knew what these newer setpaches are looking at! I ran SCRAM before installation (weeks before) to check my system. The only modifcations I made were: 1) Set SCSI timeout to 2 seconds (based on another person's recomendation) 2) Enabled SYNC SCSI transfers (I put that back to OFF, no change) Here is what SCRAM is showing for infos: Motherboard: CPU:68030 FPU:68882 Ramsey: Normal, Code $0d, Page Detect OFF, Burst Mode ON, Wrap Mode OFF. Gary: Normal, Code $00, Timeout:ON Mode:BERR Agnus: ECS NTSC 8372 Code $30 Denise: ECS Code $fc Ram Chips: 1×4, Refresh rate:238 clocks Type:Page Chip:2M, Fast:4M. BattMem Status: SCSI Timeout:2 Sec LUNs:Only 0 SyncXfer:OFF HostID:Unit6 "Amnesias": Amiga bits OK Shared bits OK That last entry "Amnesias" originally came up "LOST", meaning the memory lost power & default settings. I manually revived them by clicking on the gadget. My System is a vanilla A3000/25, no boards, single 50 Meg Quantum ProDrive HD, one floppy. Does anything here look odd? — Dave
#165688From: Wayne SteeleSep 28, 1994 12:05 PM
Dave: Very interesting. Do you still have your 2.04 ROM's around? If so, try putting them back in and booting with a 2.x floppy that's equipped with SetPatch v40.16. I was using v40.16 when I still had Kickstart/Workbench 2.x, so it should work (it did quite a few patches). This might help determine if it is something that SetPatch is looking for or if you have some goofy 3.1 ROM's. Wayne
#165770From: Dave ArreSep 29, 1994 10:02 AM
OK, I'll try that, but I probably won't be able to get to it for a couple days… no time to tear apart the computer again. <g> Actually, so far the computer is working fine without SetPatch… things seem to run quicker too… I might just leave it as is! BTW, I remember about a year ago I downloaded the SetPatch V37.38 from CIS, and tried it out on my old WB 2.04 system, and it crashed, so I relegated it to the trash heap. I would tend to think that, given this experience, changing the ROMs back would probably not work, either. I'll give it a shot, though. I just wonder what is it about my computer that makes SetPatches crash? — Dave
#165805From: Wayne SteeleSep 29, 1994 7:51 PM
> I just wonder what is it about my computer that makes SetPatches crash? So do I! I've never encountered this kind of problem before. Perhaps there is simply something wrong with your hardware. Oh well… If it's working the way it is, I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it.
#165575From: Dave ArreSep 27, 1994 10:49 AM
Jim: I just tried booting with the SetPatch here in the Library, Version 40.14 (mine is 40.16), and got the same thing. Looks like I'll have to live without a SetPatch. — Dave
#165828From: James R. OllickSep 29, 1994 11:15 PM
At least until the next release of WB. Jim R. Ollick Using AP from Bergenfield, NJ
#165931From: Harald W. SchulzOct 1, 1994 12:42 PM
Dave, allow me to drop in: For a couple of weeks I try to find different opinions and experiences with OS 3.1, and so I followed this thread … Two years ago I had a similar problem with a 68030-board; some programs did crash when they should run, and I still had installed WB 2.0 at this time… just deactivate the setpatch-command in the startup-sequence … -> ; setpatch >nil: QUIET … Boot and try to switch the caches on with 'CPU CACHE'; if you get a crash, then you might have a broken chip on your board, and the FPU will not work. I know this could mean bad news for you; 3-( ; if your board will really be faulty, there are only two solutions: sent it to service, or change it. If you can live with the lower speed (without cache), try SETPATCH with the option NOCACHE 🙂 But I hope for you, it's something else… Harry with AP
#166090From: Dave ArreOct 3, 1994 12:16 AM
Harry… Thanks for the reply & advice. I have tried your suggestion about entering the 'CPU Cache' command. That works. I have since put it in my User-Startup file, due to the increased performance I get in that mode. The SetPatch is commented-out. The only thing I can think of at this point is the possibility that SetPatch is trying to enable Burst Mode on the CPU, which means, since I have Page-type RAM, that the machine will crash. I think I will try to issue the command 'CPU Burst' and see what happens… if the same thing happens as SetPatch, then we may be on to something. I'll let you know what happens.. — Dave
#165945From: Andres StaubliOct 1, 1994 4:31 PM
If you work with 040 and OS 3.1 then look to replace the 68040.lib from your 040 install disk. OS 3.1 contents a old version of this lib. NAVCIS from Switzerland Andres Staubli
#165957From: James R. OllickOct 1, 1994 5:35 PM
Version reports 37.30 for my 68040.library, is this the latest? If not where can I get it? Jim R. Ollick Using AP from Bergenfield, NJ