CompuServe Thread

#PAR and DAT backup?

16 messages in this thread
#128439From: James GrottoOct 11, 1994 8:28 PM
I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions for high-capacity backup for the PAR, DAT or otherwise? I'm interested in knowing what people are successfully using to backup their PAR data. I am currently using QIC 80 and am finding it is a real hassle for large animations. Any suggestions?
#128451From: Gus GrubbaOct 11, 1994 9:40 PM
Try a 4mm DAT SCSI tape. I use two. An 8Gig unit from HP (runs around $1.4k) and a 2Gig unit from Archive (Archive Python) which runs for a little less than $1k. The HP flies at around 50M a minute (from an Unix workstation). The Archive isn't any slow poke either at 15M a minute (from a Pentium system).
#128456From: James GrottoOct 11, 1994 10:13 PM
Hey Gus! Thanks for the suggestions! 2 quick questions: 1) Are the units SCSI? 2) Are you backing up straight offthe PAR drive? Thanks again Jim G. P.S. – NDUMP is great! I do have one question about it, but I'll save that for a rainy day.
#128480From: ROBERT RITGEROct 12, 1994 12:19 AM
I'm doing a two step disk mirror process. I routinely copy my .ANI files over to a DEC Alpha workstation via Pathworks. From there I have them backed off to an Exabyte 8500.
#128497From: Gus GrubbaOct 12, 1994 3:21 AM
1)Yes they're both SCSI. Just plug and play (well, sort off. You know how that goes). 2)Either way. I don't think I have any real pattern (nor any animation worth saving for that matter). Technically, it's better to transfer the animation to a computer first and than to tape. The PAR has a very sloooooow transfer rate over the PC bus. The tape has to keep coming back as it gets way ahead of the game (it expects a data stream of at least 300k a second). By transferring the animation to disk first and then to tape saves the tape unit from excessive wear. NDUMP was designed as a generic tool. It can do things people don't even realise. As such, it has too many questions and people get pretty confused. Specially when dealing with shared disks that have different mount points in different computers. I'm finishing a PAR specific NDUMP that asks no questions. It just does what's supposed to do.
#128687From: James GrottoOct 12, 1994 8:41 PM
Gus, I'm not claiming to know all of the uses of NDUMP, but I do think it is a great and powerful tool. I think my question might be an easy one and actually I have already setup a work around, but I just thought I would get your opinion. I have a few pentiums on my networked and often render a few different projects a night on the network. I have noticed however that NDUMP uses a single file, NDUMP.TMP, to specify the next frame to dump and that file gets written when you exit the NDUMP setup box. So when I set up my first animation to use NDUMP and put it in the queue, everything is AOK. Now I setup my second animation and as soon as I exit the NDUMP setup box, my first animation stops NDUMPing because NDUMP.TMP no longer coincides with my first project. Now for every project I add, NDUMP.TMP always coincides to the last project I add. If I reset NDUMP.TMP to the proper frame for the currently rendering animation, NDUMP will only dump the current animation. **** THE WORK AROUND **** To get around this problem I wrote a batch file I call NDSET. Which looks like this: @echo off echo %1 > network-path\NDUMP.TMP I execute this batch file in my Video Post Queue on the first frame to be rendered and this resets NDUMP.TMP at the beginning of each project in the Network Queue. This seems to work provided I make sure to reset NDUMP.TMP if there was an active network job when I exited the NDUMP setup. I was just wondering if had an easier way to accomplish the same task? Glad to hear about the PAR specific version. Let me know when it becomes available. Thanks – Jim G.
#128759From: Gus GrubbaOct 13, 1994 12:42 AM
That's one of the things I'm working on. First of all, there is a new name. It is now called PAROUT as it is specific to the PAR. PAROUR doesn't create any temp files. I rely on the *.DAT file 3D Studio creates at the end of each render. That way, you can have multiple projects queued up and PAROUT will take care of them all in the right order (i.e. those projects that have PAROUT as the last process on the VP queue). I've also eliminated all questions. If you just click on PAROUT it will start working. No need to setup anything (though you still can go in and set "advanced" parameters). PAROUT know which machine has the PAR so you don't have to set the NETNAME. It also knows where the image files are being created and the file name used. No need to specify that. It knows how many frames there are, the step count, and it will properly wait for the last frame to be ready so there will not be a problem of missing a couple of frames at the end of a batch process. It creates a log file that can pinpoint any problem that might occur so trouble shooting will be very simple (famous last words). There is massive amounts (proportionally speaking) of AI in this new (totally rewriten) code. I'm sure it will make everyone pleased.
#128874From: Don LandisOct 13, 1994 3:13 PM
Sounds great, Gus.
#128873From: Don LandisOct 13, 1994 3:13 PM
>> I'm finishing a PAR specific NDUMP that asks no questions. It just does what's supposed to do. Brilliant!
#128934From: Christopher CrawforOct 13, 1994 7:52 PM
Hi Gus, I noticed your post regarding DAT drives. We have a new DDS-2 drive and are having a difficult time getting our software (Arcada Backup Exec) working properly. What software do you use? Christopher
#128940From: Gus GrubbaOct 13, 1994 8:38 PM
That's the question of the century. I have yet to find a Backup software for the PC that works (specially with SCSI tapes). They all stink. I tried just about everyone out there. I did have some luck with Fifth Generation FastBack but it didn't work with the Pentium so I had to forget it. On the PC I've been using Central Point's backup. It's a russian roulette type deal. Some times it works, sometimes it doesn't. I don't care too much as all important data goes off to the file server. This would be just to avoid having to reinstall all the software in the world in case the disk goes bad. The server is Unix. I use (what else) TAR. Never fails but it's plain nuts to try to restore a couple of files only. I have an X front end that allows selecting files (or directories) to restore but it takes a good 45 minutes just to build the file list. Backup is automatic. It goes off every morning at 8am and I switch between 8 tapes (seven days a week and one gets stored for ever or until I run out of tapes, whichever comes first).
#128968From: SyndesisOct 13, 1994 11:43 PM
I've been using WinNT's 'backup' with my Exabyte 8500. So far, so good. I can backup and verify everything (almost 2 gigs) on my machine in less than an hour – I may be wrong, I always set-and-forget it when I leave at night. It has a simple file-manager-like interface for retrieving old files. It does multiple sets per tape, too, so I'm not wasting the full size of those 5 gig tapes. 🙂
#128994From: Gus GrubbaOct 14, 1994 5:17 AM
I tried that too. After locking up twice in the middle of a backup session I gave up.
#128986From: MARTIN G FOSTEROct 14, 1994 3:07 AM
I've had good luck with Novaback/Novastor on a 486/66 and on an SGI Indy using an HP DAT backup (DDS1, I think).
#128991From: John TissavaryOct 14, 1994 4:19 AM
I use Nova stuff too, on the PC and really like it. I'm still just tar-ing on SGI, but I'd like to have a more flexible interface.
#129096From: MARTIN G FOSTEROct 14, 1994 6:29 PM
John, >> I use Nova stuff too, on the PC and really like it. << me too. I've also used tar on the SGI Indy and it's rather lacking in features but it does work.