CompuServe Thread

#Record Deck?

6 messages in this thread
#44739From: Kevin RagsdaleDec 15, 1994 4:03 PM
What would be the best (or most cost-effective) record deck to use for local commericals? I know BetaCam is the best, but that's way out of my price range – even the new "low-cost" UVW's. My cammy is a Sony VX-3; from there the footage is dumped to an Applied Magic Digital Broadcaster non-linear editor, and the finished output is sent to a S-VHS deck. Most people are telling me I should get a 3/4" deck; that way, the cable company or affiliates won't have to make a dub. I remember reading somewhere about buying these decks used – does anyone have any information? I'd really appreciate the help. Kevin Ragsdale
#44747From: James R. OllickDec 15, 1994 8:55 PM
You can pick up an old Sony VO-2869A 3/4" U-Matic for $350 to $500. They are real work horses. The 5850's can be had used for $2,000 to $3,000. The 9850SPs can usually be found for $4,000 to $5,000 used. Just pick up any video specific rag and check the classifieds. Jim R. Ollick Using AP from Bergenfield, NJ
#44750From: Christopher LapriseDec 16, 1994 2:15 AM
IMHO, 3/4" is obsolete. The general consensus I've experienced is that S-VHS offers roughly the same quality and costs far less. What's more, many stations that had 3/4" are converting to Betacam-SP (more $$$) or S-VHS (less $); new affiliates (like FOX stations) are S-VHS based for editing and Hi8 for field camera work. I'll repeat the advice I've heard before: If you must have a 3/4" machine, don't buy new. -Chris
#44756From: Stephen SponagleDec 16, 1994 4:18 PM
We've found a great reason for 3/4" tape machines; so great, we bought a new VO-9800 with the SMPTE time code card. Our clients shoot on Betacam, and in order to save the tape from too many passes, we window-burn them to 3/4 for use on an offline Avid system. This business has more than paid for the machine in six months. -Steve
#44771From: Christopher LapriseDec 17, 1994 9:22 PM
"Our clients shoot on Betacam, and in order to save the tape from too many passes, we window-burn them to 3/4 for use on an offline Avid system." Yet you still edit with Betacam. I do the same thing, with Hi8 and S-VHS (I use the S-VHS window dub to made the edit decisions)… Must you have paid for a 3/4" machine? -Chris
#44786From: Stephen SponagleDec 19, 1994 12:36 PM
Some of the reasons for choosing the 3/4 was: 1. It was competitively priced to S-VHS & Hi-8. 2. It has a jog/shuttle dial with a viewable FF & still image. 3. It has known ruggedness & durability. 4. It has pro inputs/outputs (XLR & BNC). 5. It has real time-code. 6. It has an RS-422 9-pin. 7. A lot of people out there still using 3/4" making this deck rentable. And, of course we still online with Betacam! It depends on the production, if we need a lot of effects/DVE etc., or the best quality, we use a traditional bay, or we may opt for a Avid online session if the production is more straight forward. Either way, we will have saved lots of passes on the original source footage. -Steve