CompuServe Thread

#CAD

26 messages in this thread
#92580From: Barry MassoniNov 8, 1987 7:07 PM
Ben, "Watanebe"=Western Graphtec plotter language emulation (its not an acronymn, I don`t know what the hell it means). Can PCLO drive that? You said that tou would check to see if the "print" function had been disabled from PCLO, did you find out yet? If it hasn`t then it would appear that my printer doesn`t function with PCLO. No matter how long I let it sit there, displaying its, "Please wait, check plot in progress" message I don`t get a system request telling me to check the printer. I beleive that you stated in your last message that there was a "do it yourself" plotter language in the works. Was that for PCLO _and_ PCLOplus or just PCLOplus? I just notice that should say, in the line above, _plotter driver_, not language. Is there a release date? And finally, the subject of cost arrises. What do these pacakges run? Barry
#92660From: Ben BlishNov 9, 1987 2:03 AM
The do it yourself driver is due very soon — three weeks or less -and it will function with PCLO, PCLOjr, and PCLOplus. And actually, it does implement a plotter language, in a very real sense. The print function is not disabled… how much memory do you have? I have a thought that it may not be able to load in the printer driver… (not your fault, if so… the program may be too large, and if so, needs fixing) Prices are 69.95 – PCLOjr, 199.95 – PCLO, 499.95 – PCLOplus, and 199.95 – Scheme (This is a new one, provides Schematic Capture capability… really neat) –Ben–
#92806From: Barry MassoniNov 10, 1987 4:35 AM
Ben, About the "print" function on the PCLO demo. I`m using an Amiga 500 with 1 Meg of memory. I doubt that it can`t load do to a memory shortage. The printer I`m using is a Seikosha SP-1000AS (Epson compatible, made by Seikosha-Epson). It prints both graphics and text. It is on and online and I get no "system request" asking me to check the printer. When the "do it yourself" driver is intorduced what will its price be? Barry
#92948From: Ben BlishNov 11, 1987 2:19 AM
It will be included in the system — no charge, and free upgrade to previous owners… probably will be posted here as well. Did you make certain that your system disk has the parallel.device in the devs directory? Other than that, I can't think why it wouldn't work… Printing begins almost immediately after you start the process, assuming everythings ok. Let me try ther demo here, I'll get back to you. –Ben–
#92671From: Ben BlishNov 9, 1987 2:39 AM
Barry — the printer driver uses the "parallel.device" — make sure it's on your disk… –Ben–
#92807From: Barry MassoniNov 10, 1987 4:38 AM
What???? Parallel.device???? No wonder it doesn`t work! I have a serial printer! Supposed to be Epson compatible though, works with the Amiga "Epson driver", and with my Epson PX-8 laptop (which I`m online now with). Barry
#92949From: Ben BlishNov 11, 1987 2:20 AM
You got it Barry — parallel it is. You see, the plotters we picked are serial, and most printers are parallel… and that's the way it works, period. Sorry about that. <grin> –Ben–
#92983From: Barry MassoniNov 11, 1987 4:52 AM
Ben, When I had nothing connected to the parallel port, why didn`t I get a "system request" asking me to check printer and paper? Barry
#93098From: Ben BlishNov 12, 1987 2:32 AM
Because it's not a "printer" operation — it's a parallel operation. The Parallel.device does not support such neat things. –Ben–
#92695From: Aegis DevelopmentNov 9, 1987 1:05 PM
Is that an ASCII plotter driver …. i.e. command x stuff y stuff? Just curious of Draw Plus will drive it.
#92808From: Barry MassoniNov 10, 1987 4:47 AM
Are you talking about the Graphtec plotters? I really don`t know. What I do know (from hanging around other forums) is that it is supposedly a very old command set that was piped through the serial port. From its references I take it that is is still used by IBM type CAD packages? Can I ask a few questions about Draw plus? I guess you know I`m looking for a CAD package. What kind of drivers does yours come with? Since I am looking for both a CAD program and a plotter this is very important. I want to know what can be used with what! The other thing I wanted to know is wether draw plus has an auto-routing feature for PCB design. Thanks again. Barry
#92843From: Aegis DevelopmentNov 10, 1987 1:01 PM
Draw Plus supports the HPGL, HI, Epson, Apple and any plotter which uses ASCII text to draw. You can even drive PostScript!. Draw Plus has a file (text) called a plot driver (several examples on disk) that tells Draw Plus what commands to use for your plotter, the plotter resolution, and the number of pens. So in theory almost any plotter can be driven. (Of course some plotters don't use ASCII!!!!!!). Draw Plus is a generic drafting package so it doesn't do auto-routing, PCLO seems to be the top auto-routing software for the Amiga. I hope to see some level of programability in future Aegis CAD products that will make it possible for vendors to add that ability to a product. Good luck.
#92982From: Barry MassoniNov 11, 1987 4:49 AM
Thanks for the information.
#92708From: Richard Rae/SYSOPNov 9, 1987 3:20 PM
"Watanabe" (with one E, not two) is a rather common Japanese name. Could a Mr. Watanabe have developed the graphics language or the original plotter for Graphtec which used same? Sort of like saying "RPN"? Trivia (fairly easy trivia): anyone know why RPN is called RPN? Rick
#92735From: Ben BlishNov 9, 1987 7:45 PM
Short form of "Reverse Polish Notation" –Ben–
#92831From: Richard Rae/SYSOPNov 10, 1987 12:44 PM
<Frown> Well of COURSE it's short for Reverse Polish Notation. But why is it CALLED that? 8) Rick
#92859From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 10, 1987 4:10 PM
Rick, Let me take a stab at this (if I recall something I learned a long time ago!): Polish notation is called that due to some Polish mathmatician who decided that algebraic logic should read a+b=c thus requiring you to fully evaluate (a+b) before you got any result for c. Reverse Polish Notation is where c=a+b and c is constantly changing as (a+b) gets evaluated. This is the way computers work, they call a register "c" and then load the value a into the register (thus at this step c=a) and then add b to that register to get the final result. That saves 1 step, the first method requires you to load register with a, then add b to that register and then move the result to a 2nd register we'll call "c". The second method doesn't require the final step of transfering from the "work" register to the register called "c" since both are the same. As to who the Polish mathmatician was…that I don't know at all. At least that's the way I remember it. Don
#93126From: Richard Rae/SYSOPNov 12, 1987 9:52 AM
Well, you've hit all around it, and if I don't drop the answer I was wanting, everyone will get on my case for letting it get to hard. You went into the technicalities, which I wasn't intending. It's called Reverse Polish Notation (reverse for the reasons you mentioned) because no one could pronounce the mathematician's name… or remember how to spell it. "RPN" was a compromise. This started with the "Watanabe" plotter name question, which made me think of the poor Pole who never really got the credit he deserved. Rick
#93443From: John FoustNov 14, 1987 2:34 PM
No, I thought Polish notation did get its name from its inventor. Could his name have been "Polish", literally? (Sort of like Dave Barry always says: "The diesel engine, named after its inventor, Rudolph Engine." What, you don't know Dave Barry?)
#93477From: John DraperNov 14, 1987 5:32 PM
#93539From: Steve AhlstromNov 15, 1987 12:16 AM
It's probably in Brodie's "Starting Forth". My copy is boxed up in the basement so I can't check (easily).
#93744From: Cheryl PetersonNov 16, 1987 2:19 PM
#93981From: John FoustNov 18, 1987 12:22 AM
Cutie? When am I going to be taken seriously? 🙂
#93880From: Richard Rae/SYSOPNov 17, 1987 12:04 PM
These messages have been marked for reading with the RM Function
#92954From: Ben BlishNov 11, 1987 2:26 AM
Duh? –Ben–
#92809From: Barry MassoniNov 10, 1987 4:51 AM
Interesting. And before I say that I have no idea wy RPN is RPN I`ll read the reply-but if nobody gets it you have to tell us! Barry