CompuServe Thread

#Atari ST/OS9-68K

18 messages in this thread
#95634From: BILL LEACHNov 28, 1987 7:55 PM
This may be old new (have not been keeping up too well lately) but has everyone heard that OS9-68K is out on the Atari ST now? While certainly good new for the ST owner (and Atari in general) it is bad news for Amiga. OS9 is probably the most popular OS in Europe and that will give the ST a new edge. 73, bill
#95671From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 29, 1987 12:17 AM
Bill, I'm not so sure OS9 will or won't give the ST any sort of edge over the Amiga, but what do you think will happen when UNIX becomes available for the Amiga (hint)? Don
#95799From: David MastersonNov 29, 1987 8:39 PM
Are you just blowing smoke or have you heard something about UNIX for the Amiga? UNIX is the operating system I use most at work and this would help me for development. I have seen a coprocessor card from NEC (or was it National Systems) with a 32bit processor and Unix SVR2 for the PC/XT/AT, but at ~$3000, its a little out of my reach. What have you got up your sleeve (I saw his hands leave his arms)? David Masterson
#95837From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 29, 1987 11:19 PM
David, No, I'm not blowing smoke, but there is no firm information other than the fact that a UNIX port is being looked at. I can say this, until the Amiga gets some form of an MMU…you'll not see UNIX on the Amiga. That means that at a minimum, you'll need something like CBM's 68020 card when it hits the stores. That's not expected until sometime next year. I also wouldn't be surprised if the total upgrade to UNIX for the Amiga costs in the same price category thou ($3000). The '020 card alone will probably cost in the $2000 range. Don
#95930From: David MastersonNov 30, 1987 3:39 PM
I've seen you mention the $2000 possible price tag for the CBM '020 card a couple of times now. Just for comparison, is CSA selling an A2000 card with an '020, how does it compare, and what's its price? Any rumblings in that arena about Unix? David
#95937From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 30, 1987 5:08 PM
David, First of all, just so no one reading this thread gets confused, the $2000 price estimate is _my_ estimate, not anyone else's nor is it in any way official, semi-official or otherwise from CBM. I haven't seen enought information on CSA's stuff for the A2000 to give any reasonable information on it. I've heard rumblings of a UNIX port for over a year now, but figure it's going to take a stable environment both software and hardware before it will come to life. The A2000 seems like it is that environment….but I'd guess anyone comtemplating a UNIX port would want to wait for 6 months or so to see what, if anything, is going to change. Unfortunately, the changes from the original expansion specs to Zorro to A2000 Zorro didn't help in this area. Supposedly they were for the good of the Amiga, and at this point, I'd tend to agree with that…but it did make hardware manufacturers shaky about developing for the Amiga. Don
#96082From: John FoustDec 1, 1987 12:08 PM
I did hear is semi-officially from CBM that it was about $2000. Whatever semi-officially means, I don't know.
#96215From: David MastersonDec 2, 1987 12:23 AM
Just read on Usenet that someone had gotten Minix to work on an Amiga. The bad news is that they did it on the PC side of an A2000, but the good news is they didn't have any problems (d**n). If it only it worked on a 68000 architecture… <sigh> David Masterson
#95804From: BILL LEACHNov 29, 1987 8:58 PM
Don: WHEN? You bet. That would really be a 'shot in the Arm' for the Ami, many of the 'serious' computer types have already picked up the Ami since they could not stand to be without their multitasking. Of course a second effect would be to divide the users yet again (totally incompatable operating systems) but then DEC does still seem to be surviving. 73, bill
#95844From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 29, 1987 11:28 PM
Bill, I left what information I have in an earlier message, but to quickly go over it…you won't see UNIX until you see an MMU. You won't see that until you see something like CBM's '020 card. All that meaning you won't even have the possibility until sometime next year. If I had to take a _wild_ guess, I'd probably say not until next Summer for anything in the way of a UNIX for the Amiga. And I could be _way_ off in that esitmate. Don
#96012From: Terry CarrollNov 30, 1987 11:43 PM
What's an MMU?
#96024From: Don Curtis/SYSOPDec 1, 1987 12:10 AM
Terry, A Memory Management Unit…a specialized chip that keeps one program from using memory that has been allocated to another program. Don
#95692From: Thomas HoladayNov 29, 1987 8:25 AM
What's the asking price on OS/9 for ST? Fifty dollars?
#95805From: BILL LEACHNov 29, 1987 8:59 PM
<choke, gag> $50!!! Good luck Thomas! The developers version is about $700 and the plain system is around $300 (don't be too quick about quoting me since I don't have the brocure with me). The developers version includes 'C' and the other include 'Basic.' Beyond that I don't know too much about it. 73, bill
#95903From: Thomas HoladayNov 30, 1987 7:08 AM
I thought that since AmigaDOS 1.2 was $14.95, that this OS/9 would have to be no more than three times as expensive (rounding up). The way folks talk about it makes me curious.
#95969From: BILL LEACHNov 30, 1987 8:21 PM
Thomas: OS9 is an old and mature operating system that has been a multitasker for many years. A port to the Ami would probably be real tough but only because the hardware is so advanced. By the way the commercial version is about $150 (on 10X <grin>). 73, bill
#96071From: Ben BlishDec 1, 1987 10:04 AM
OS9 is multitasking, multiuser, supports re-entrancy for loaded commands and modules, and provides all this to the ST, which had none of it. It also takes away the ICON interface. OS9 has always been pretty expansive (It was 100.00 for the CoCo, and that was certainly a minimal implementation) The people behind OS9 think of it as a professional level product. I think that's where the price comes from, as well as the functionality. WB1.2, while a very good set of bug fixes and new features, didn't add anything like multitasking or multiuser. We always had the former, and the latter is sort of a questionable point, but it didn't change with the update. CBM had us pay for our power up front. Perhaps that's another factor in the price difference? Just thinking out loud (click, click) <grin> –Ben–
#95737From: Dan MooreNov 29, 1987 3:16 PM
Bill, Have you priced OS9 on the ST? A full system (OS, compilers, etc.) is about $600. They have been shipping it for several months now and almost no one is getting it due to the cost. People also aren't very thrilled by the almost complete loss of the "standard" ST interface. OS9 doesn't have much support for windows, mice, etc. and people who buy the ST expect them. Just like Amiga owners expect to be able to use their mouse in a program. IDRIS (Whitesmith's Unix(tm) clone) is about to be released on the ST. And the response is probably going to be the same since it's going to sell for about $800. I wouldn't worry too much about what Atari is or isn't doing or what is or isn't being developed/released for it. The Amiga has to make it on it's own merits not by continually reacting to what other companies are thought to be doing. Dan