CompuServe Thread

A2000 CTL Suggestions

17 messages in this thread
#5091From: Alan RussellNov 1, 1990 9:58 PM
I would like to know the name and model of some good SCSI controllers for the A2000.. I do not need the fastest, but reliabilty and compatiablity do interest me.. Also, I think I would like the card to be able to handle some ram… Are their any CTL's that handle IDE drives for the a2000?? I hear the A3001 accelerator does but what about something else –Alan
#5111From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 2, 1990 12:11 AM
Alan, For reliability and compatability…I don't think you could go wrong with the A2091 from Commodore. Nope…I know of no controller for the Amiga that handles IDE drives, doesn't mean there isn't one…just never heard of it. Don
#5173From: James ScottNov 2, 1990 10:10 PM
Alan, The one I'm using right now is the Impact Series II Card From GVP (Great Valley products) it is the Fastest I have used out of two other controller cards. I have had the 2090 from Commadore, Aswell as the Supra Wordsync. the Impact Series II, It handles to types of Drives SCSI, and will even handle AT Quantum drives, I haven't tested it with one but that is what the configuring software says. James Scott Great Day to be Alive
#5188From: Brian BartlettNov 3, 1990 1:46 AM
Alan, there was an IDE controller demonstrated at AmiExpo Anaheim by a german company. Basically all it was was a board that you installed in your 68000 socket and then installed the 68000 CPU chip in. Software took care of the rest since the IDE controllers are on the actual drive. I can't find my flyer from them, but perhaps someone else has it on hand, it was all in german with an english translation inserted. Cost, approx $59 or so. Just a sidebar, you save on one drive with IDE, but you pay more in the long run once you start adding drives after the first. Brian J. Bartlett
#5195From: ICD, Inc.Nov 3, 1990 9:35 AM
ICD was showing an IDE interface that sits under the 68000.
#5298From: Christopher LapriseNov 4, 1990 10:54 PM
Why IDE came along at all is beyond me, considering SCSI was already an established standard. But that's the klone market for ya.
#5356From: ICD, Inc.Nov 5, 1990 9:23 PM
IDE isn't really a SCSI competitor, it is an ST506/412 or ESDI competitor. Many AT clones have IDE interfaces on the motherboard, hence the term "AT interface". Craig
#5684From: Christopher LapriseNov 9, 1990 11:27 PM
IDE is an 'intelligent' peripheral buss, no? I don't see any significant difference in fuctionality between IDE and SCSI. So, again, why develop IDE in a standards-conscious (or paranoid, even) MS-DOS market when SCSI was already running on several platforms?
#5696From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 10, 1990 1:02 AM
Chris, No, IDE isn't an intelligent interface…'IDE' stands for Integrated Drive Electronics. Essentially, it's putting the drive controller and drive electronics all on the drive…rather than on 2 separate boards as is currently done. Don
#5723From: Christopher LapriseNov 10, 1990 11:38 AM
Don, Putting the controller on the drive is the same practice used with SCSI drives. That is what makes them 'intelligent', in that the computer sends track or block-oriented commands and the drive obliges by taking care of the low-level details.
#5799From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 11, 1990 1:49 AM
Chris, Well..I suppose if you want to call that "intelligence" then ok. My understanding (which does get fuzzy here) is that IDE doesn't handle any more details than a ST-506 type controller does. In other words, the computer must requst cylinder, head and block numbers just as it does with an ST-506 controller. Of course, at some point…all that must get translated to a physical sector on the disk. Doesn't matter what interface or bus protocol, they all end up translating what the computer wants into a (set of) physical secotors. Don
#5701From: ICD, Inc.Nov 10, 1990 6:16 AM
Apparently the needed interface circuitry (at the time, anyway) was much less for IDE drives. It is a much simpler and less flexible interface, too. It is easier to include as part of the computer's motherboard. Our AdIDE was designed to allow mounting a 2" IDE drive _inside_ an Amiga 500. These little tiny drives don't come in SCSI yet.
#5724From: Christopher LapriseNov 10, 1990 11:39 AM
So the IDE buss is much simpler than SCSI. Does that mean it can't support devices like tape drives? Sounds very promising, putting such a small unit in an A500. Would you know what capacities those 2" units are available in? Lotsa questions..
#5887From: ICD, Inc.Nov 11, 1990 10:04 PM
The drive we are using now is 20 megs. Little tiny thing. Two stacked together would be about the size of a pack of cigarettes. I don't really have much detail about it myself. Since I will begin writing the manual for it this week, I think, I expect I will learn all about it in the next few days. Ask me about IDE again in a week and I should have lots more to talk about. Craig
#5253From: Wayne ColeNov 4, 1990 2:17 AM
Alan, GVP makes combo RAM/SCSI controller cards. I got one of the first (controller + 1 meg) and am trading for the new series II hard card. That allows 8 meg + controller + hd to be mounted on the card. It autoboots, supports FFS on all partitions. I've had no compatibilty problems with any software (and I have a ton) in the 24 months I've had the card. wmc
#5266From: Alan RussellNov 4, 1990 11:34 AM
Thanks… If I buy a Impact 8+ and later I buy a '030 accellerator card (one that accepts many meg of 32bit access ram) can I disable the ram function on the impact +8?? Alan Russell
#5787From: Wayne ColeNov 11, 1990 12:27 AM
Alan, I'm runnign on my new Impact 8+ now (with 2meg on board). As for the 32 bit memory, I don't think you could disable the 16 bit memory. I think thereare some utilities that set things up so that 32bit fast ram gets used first when the accelerator is being used. I haven't accelerated yet soIcant help you there. wmc