CompuServe Thread

#New Chip Set for 2000

30 messages in this thread
#5711From: Hilary SzymanowskiNov 10, 1990 9:50 AM
Does anyone know when the upgrade chip set will be available for the 2000 ? Of particular interest to me is the new "Super Denise" chip which will allow higher resolution in character generation. Also – is there ant idea of price ? Regards to all, HILARY
#5736From: RON TROYNov 10, 1990 2:55 PM
Spring 91 if I read the message on the CBM service forum correctly. Ron
#5767From: Betty Clay/SYSOPNov 10, 1990 10:16 PM
Hilary, All I can do is suppose, but here is my opinion: The SuperDenise cannot help you until you have 2.0 installed, therefore there is no need to release the chip until 2.0 is released. I know that the chip has been finished for quite some time, and that many of the developers are using them to betatest 2.0 software and to test their own software running on 2.0 and using the new Denise. I think it is not released because it wouldn't do you any good without 2.0, and 2.0 is not yet ready for release. Betty
#5845From: RON TROYNov 11, 1990 6:20 PM
Betty, if I remember right CBM originally suggested that 2.0 would be released for the 2000 around 9/90, including the chip set, and now they're saying sometime in spring 1991? Ron
#5897From: Betty Clay/SYSOPNov 11, 1990 10:51 PM
Ron, you know how it is when they are getting new software ready. It just didn't get finished as soon as they had hoped -and it will be out when it's out. The latest beta version is FAR more stable than the one prior to it, so let's be glad they are still working things out instead of sending us buggy ROMs. Betty
#5938From: Ethan SolomitaNov 12, 1990 11:58 AM
Betty, obviously it was a tarnish to Commodore's image when they set a date for release and then missed it. That is fine. It happens to everyone. But Commodore won't even admit it! They won't give a new date, they won't say why it happened, they won't even say ANYTHING. That is what bothers me the most. They're the ones who said September in the first place. If they didn't want critics pushing them they shouldn't have announced a date they couldn't keep. — Ethan
#6006From: MicroSearch/Greg WhiteNov 13, 1990 12:04 AM
Ethan, I don't believe CBM has ever "officially" given a release date for 2.0. At least, working at dealership, I have never seen one. Remember, rumor or what a CBM rep tells you on the side does not constitute an "official" release date. I believe what CBM considers an "official" release is just that, i.e. a press release both in print and on the BBS's, probably by Dave Minnich, and dealers being told the product is now available.
#6011From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 13, 1990 12:51 AM
Greg, CBM did announce 2.0 for the A2000 in a press released dated 24 April 90. It was the same announcement as the A3000 announcement. I quote from the press release: "Commodore further announced an AmigaDOS 2.0 enhancer kit for A2000 series machines to be available in September. Availability of a 2.0 enhancer kit for the A500 series machines will be announced at a future date." The press release was from Fleishman-Hillarad, Inc (CBM's ad agency) on Commodore letterhead.
#6099From: MicroSearch/Greg WhiteNov 14, 1990 12:31 AM
I stand corrected. April was so long ago the release had faded into the mists of my mind. As a matter of fact, it is getting pretty misty in here. I guess this is why I usually ignore these things until we get word that we can now place our orders with CBM. Sorry. Greg Greg White / MicroSearch 72230,1617 We listen to our customers..carefully
#6012From: Ethan SolomitaNov 13, 1990 1:09 AM
Commodore OFFICIALLY stated a September release in their flurry of Press Releases back in April. They said May for AmigaVision, June for A3000, July for the start of networking products, and September for 2.0. That date passed and there was a lot of anger on usenet. To date Commodore has said nothing. — Ethan
#6100From: MicroSearch/Greg WhiteNov 14, 1990 12:31 AM
I stand corrected. April was so long ago the release had faded into the mists of my mind. As a matter of fact, it is getting pretty misty in here. I guess this is why I usually ignore these things until we get word that we can now place our orders with CBM. Sorry.
#6062From: Ben A LottNov 13, 1990 7:51 PM
Well then I guess those letters we recieved, stating that it would be available by Oct. and gave upgrade pricing, are an illusion (this isn't a slight against you but against C= wonderful way of distributing literature, there are a number of announcements that they didn't send us either). BEN Leigh's Computer's
#5943From: RON TROYNov 12, 1990 2:07 PM
I agree that I want 2 to be stable, but Spring 1991? Ron
#5975From: Gregory B. TibbsNov 12, 1990 8:05 PM
It will take 60 days for CBM to package and distribute 2.0 once it is ready. That's what 1.3 took. So if they finish it by year's end, it will be 1 March before it is ready. If they finish sooner, then it might happen before. -Greg
#5985From: RON TROYNov 12, 1990 9:30 PM
A developer told me today that he had received a 2.0 marked 'final'. So should we expect it January 12? Ron
#6022From: Gregory B. TibbsNov 13, 1990 6:02 AM
One of the early versions of 2.0 was called 'ROM-candidate' and there have been several updates since. Since the September delivery date was broken, they won't receive any more wrath than they are now by waiting. Besides, is anything ever final? 🙂
#6023From: RON TROYNov 13, 1990 6:15 AM
I guess I'm just getting frustrated still again; they announce a date and don't meet it, even when that date was a long way off. We get to see the new release, we just can't have it. It reminds me of the Janus 2 fiasco; it came out for the 286, and I think it took around a year to be really available for the 88; and at a much higher price (at first) then expected. And now, we know that a new Janus is being worked on, no doubt to support new hardware, and they won't even tell us if existing Janus 2 bugs will ever be fixed or what year that might happen. Since I may need the missing functionality for work, I'm getting even more frustrated.
#6085From: Betty Clay/SYSOPNov 13, 1990 10:43 PM
Ah, Ron – – if Commodore tells you what they think will happen, and it is late, you get terribly frustrated. And if they DON't tell you what they are doing, or when they expect to finish, you get terribly frustrated. Gee, it seems to me, you spend quite a lot of time being terribly frustrated, no matter WHAT Commodore does!! 🙂 Just relax, Ron. It will get here when it's ready, and not before, and there is nothing we can do about it – no need to get upset. Betty
#6117From: RON TROYNov 14, 1990 7:08 AM
Betty, they did announce a date, didn't meet it, and now won't even apologise or explain. And in some areas, like Janus, we don't even know if they're planning to deal with problems. In one way I'm not in a hurry for 2.0; I don't know if my Kronos will run under it. Ron
#6095From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 14, 1990 12:04 AM
Humm…seems to me that Commodore gave permission within a month of Janus 2.0's release for dealers to copy it for persons who could prove they had the Janus 1.0 software. Which was an easy task, you brought in your old Janus disk. The package came a year later…but you paid for the package, the dealer "deal" was a freebie.
#6118From: RON TROYNov 14, 1990 7:08 AM
The dealer deal was only available from dealers who 1. knew of it, 2. cared to let you. I bought my bb after 2 came out, and had to practically beg the dealer afterwards to let me get the copy of 2. With no docs to work with, either; not even a look at the manual.
#5891From: Christopher LapriseNov 11, 1990 10:30 PM
Betty, Amax utilities the Super Denise, apparently on it's own, without 2.0. That is the only case I know of, though.
#5908From: Ben A LottNov 11, 1990 11:21 PM
Broadcast Titler 2 offers optional Super hi-res upgrade for people with the super denise as well BEN Leigh's Computer's
#6019From: Christopher LapriseNov 13, 1990 2:27 AM
Wow. Already a titler on the market that uses super-hires.
#5924From: Betty Clay/SYSOPNov 12, 1990 12:04 AM
I was not aware that AMAX used it! Thanks. Betty
#6020From: Christopher LapriseNov 13, 1990 2:27 AM
Yes, more often than not a 400 line screen is needed to display a full Mac screen (without having to scroll around), and that means interlace if you don't have Super Denise. Using ESC hires mode is a big eye-saving feature of A-Max.
#6056From: Hilary SzymanowskiNov 13, 1990 6:31 PM
Thanks Betty. What you say makes sence. We are interested in the Denise for higher resolution in Title Software. Have you any idea when the Ver 2.0 will be available ?? All the best…… Hilary
#6125From: Betty Clay/SYSOPNov 14, 1990 9:59 AM
Hilary, No date has been set for the new set. Considering the time of year it is now, I would imagine that it would not be out until after the first of the year – but this is purely guessing. Commodore has not made an announcement about it, and the rest of us don't know. Betty
#6316From: Hilary SzymanowskiNov 16, 1990 5:35 PM
Thanks for your guess Batty. Incidently, see that RAM chips are now down to the $5.0/Each level. Think I will fill up to the full 8 Megs, just in case things get lively in Middle East. Remember things getting V E R Y short in the UK after WW.II broke out. Best regards, HILARY
#6382From: Betty Clay/SYSOPNov 17, 1990 3:57 PM
8 megs would be VERY nice. I'm still muddling along with 3. Maybe you are right – maybe it is a good time. Betty