CompuServe Thread

QICTAPE Announcement

11 messages in this thread
#6354From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 17, 1990 12:51 AM
Reid, A. If you work for Progressive, why don't you know the list price? B. If you don't work for Progressive, why are you posting an announcement for them? C. Why not DC6xxx tapes and allow alternate drives up to 525Meg capacity per tape? D. QICTAPE can't be copyrighted, it's in common use by several companies (the name…not the program) and has been for quite a while.
#6709From: Reid BishopNov 20, 1990 11:30 PM
Don, A. No, I do not work for Progressive and thus do not know the list price. Even if I did work for them, I would not know as even they have not come to a final determination as to the price of this product. B. I am a principal owner of M.V. Micro, who has contracted with PP&S to develop the hardware design and write the software for QICTAPE. We suggested a formal announcement might be made on CIS since the product is complete, only waiting for cables to be made before shipping can be begin. They agreed… C. The DC6000 series of tapes is an ENTIRELY different configuration. Not only is the format of the cartridges different, but the drive is so different that entirely different software needs to be written. The larger capacity systems use helical-scan technology, thus they use far more complex software and require better data transfer rates than are available with this system. To put it simply, your question is much like asking "why not design an accelerator board for the Amiga so that a user can plug in an '020, '030, or '040 CPU into the board, depending on his needs?" It can't be done!! D. Obviously the name QICTAPE may be in use somewhere in the industry. One does not copyright a name, rather names are trademarked. Our copyright for QicTape refers to the software and hardware design, NOT the name. Am I to believe that there is some sense of hostility in your message? After all, I have only posted a notice of a new product that should be of interest to many of the members on this forum. I fail to understand why my relationship with PP&S has been questioned, especially since you may not know anything about our contractural agreements and reponsibilities. I have nothing against you or [ MORE ]
#6725From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 21, 1990 1:07 AM
Reid, No…absolutely no hostility. As a sysop, it's part of my job to make sure the announcements here are not only real, but also from someone who is authorized to make such an announcement. From your message, I got a hint you may not have been associated with Progressive. That turns out to be true…but since you're associated with the software end of the cooperative venture…that's just as good. I was simply curious as to why only the smaller sized cartridges and drives are supported. We use DC6xxx (and DC600 which are the same size) tapes at work and I enjoy the convenience of 120Meg on a single tape. As to your comment they use helical scan techniques…at least on our tape drives at work (20, 60 and 120 Meg per cart), that's not true, the heads are fixed (other than a sliding height adjustment for track centering). Don
#7065From: Roy S. LauferNov 25, 1990 6:22 PM
Reid, What port is used for this device? The parallel or serial port??? I would strongly advise designing something that would work on larger tape media (for us guys with more than 40 megs to back up. I realize that it would be better than floppies, but an unattended DCron like backup using one tape would be much better! -RSL-
#7072From: RON TROYNov 25, 1990 8:08 PM
The QICtape runs off the floppy port. Ron
#7549From: Roy S. LauferNov 30, 1990 3:55 PM
Ron, Thanks for the info. Using the floppy port is sure "generic", I just wonder what the thru-put of such a device is. I guess I'll bide my time, until C-A startsd selling the tape streamer that will be optional for the A3000UX. -RSL-
#7589From: RON TROYNov 30, 1990 9:55 PM
The Jumbo may turn out to be a real good value; I hope so. Ron
#7734From: Brian CowanDec 2, 1990 7:21 PM
Just don't look for massive speed. Ask MS-DOS users with QIC-40 floppy port based tape units. You don't get speed, and I don't think multitasking while using the tape backup program would be a good idea. The MS-Dos units do some wierd things with the floppy ports.
#7805From: RON TROYDec 3, 1990 6:38 AM
I assume this one will too; and I've warned others against expecting hi speed. Ron
#6710From: Reid BishopNov 20, 1990 11:30 PM
[ continuation ] any of the members here, and had hoped this may be a good place to post the notice about QICTAPE. I trust you feel the same way, though you may have some reason not to. Reid Bishop- M.V. Micro
#6764From: Ken Loss-CutlerNov 21, 1990 7:08 PM
Sounds reasonable to me…. Can I expect to be able to adapt my existing backup (CMS 60Meg QIC on our Compaq) for use with our Amigas? Sure would be nice to save the 600 or so. Ken Loss-Cutler