CompuServe Thread

2.0 in a 1000???

15 messages in this thread
#38990From: C. Davey UtterOct 31, 1991 10:30 PM
Can anyone tell me if 2.0 will work in a 1000? …Dave
#38998From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiNov 1, 1991 12:17 AM
2.0 works great in a 1000, but you have to add a 3rd party board that adds an A500/2000 compatible ROM socket. I used a 2.0 ROM in an A1000 equipped with Greg Tibbs' Rejuvenator board. A much less expensive way to get the ROM in is to buy DKB's KwickStart II board. Because of 2.0's new larger size, though, you can't use a kickstart disk. DKB's board lets you switch between the 2.0 ROM and a disk-loaded Kickstart, though. …Denny Atkin
#39066From: David McCabeNov 1, 1991 8:33 PM
Denny: Do you know if the DKB board will fit in an Amiga 1000 that has the Spirit 1.5M (full) board installed? Also, how can I upgrade to a fat or fatter Agnus, or can I? If you can't answer these questions or would prefer to tell me where to go, please do so!! (I mean for the answers!!!) Thanx, David McCabe
#39204From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiNov 2, 1991 7:16 PM
David, The DKB board fits in the 1000's 68000 socket, so I'd guess it should work in a Spirit-equipped 1000. To upgrade to a 1MB or 2MB Agnus chip, you need Expert Services' Rejuvenator board. I used to own one of these, and they're GREAT. I had the full Enhanced Chip Set (the 1MB Agnes and the SuperDenise), and Kickstart 2.0 in ROM (it has a ROM socket), as well as a MicroWay FlickerFixer plugged into the Rejuvenator's video slot. There's now a version available that uses the A3000's 2MB-CHIP RAM Agnes. …Denny Atkin
#39217From: Gregory B. TibbsNov 2, 1991 8:48 PM
Thanks for the plug Denny. The spirit board fits the 68000 socket and stands quite tall. Might be a case clearance problem if another 68000 device is plugged in. -Greg – via Whap!
#39221From: David McCabeNov 2, 1991 9:12 PM
Denny, Thanx for the info!!! How can I find about both of these boards – the DKB and Rejuvenator? Also, do they have any problems with expansion devices outside the 1000? Can you put a 68020 or 68030 into either? I am currently running an Amiga 1000 with the Spirit 1.5M board fully populated, a 68010, new PALS that I got at the same time as the Spirit board, and the infamous Wedge hard-drive interface with both a Seagate 20M half-height AND a VERY OLD FULL HEIGHT 30M hard-disk with KikStart 1.3 (on disk) and WorkBench 1.3.2. Thanx, David McCabe – via WHAP!
#39001From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 1, 1991 12:44 AM
Dave, At this point in time…no, 2.0 will not run on an A1000. There's a BIG IF though. If you've upgradded the A1000 with a hardware add-on that's been designed to accept and properly address the new ROM, then yes…it will work. Don
#39053From: Leslie T. BartiromoNov 1, 1991 5:36 PM
Didn't I read here that Commodore was going make a version of 2.0 for the A1000?
#39100From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 2, 1991 12:21 AM
Leslie, Not that I'm aware of. After all, the A1000 only has 256K of WCS (kickstart RAM) and 2.0 is 512k. A bit difficult to trim it in half and still keep it the same. Don
#39203From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiNov 2, 1991 7:16 PM
Commodore engineers did comment once that a version of 2.0 for the 1000 would appear later. However, since a kickstart ROM board works so much better than a soft-loaded 512K KS on a 1000, my guess is that it won't happen after all. …Denny Atkin
#39248From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 3, 1991 2:28 AM
Denny, While Commodore Engineers may build something..that doesn't mean that Commodore marketing will sell it. Thus the engineers saying they can build an A1000 version…and one appearing at the marketplace are two entirely different things. My personal opinion is that an A1000 version will never show up. Commodore marketing twice as offered trade-ins specifically designed to pull A1000's off the street. I believe the total number 1000's sold was somewhere in the 100,000 range. Of those, I suspect that less than 1/2 are still in use but not upgradded by a rejuvenator, multi-start or some such board that allows a ROM'ed OS. Of that number, I suspect that only about 1/2 of the owners would be interested in upgradding to 2.0. So your potential sales are 25,000… not worth the effort to come up with a way to make a plain jane A1000 run 2.0 without a hardware upgrade. Don
#39111From: Mike ToddNov 2, 1991 4:53 AM
Leslie The question of 2.0 availability for the A1000 will rely on Commodore keeping their promises from a few months back. However, one thing is certain … it cannot be used without a reasonable amount of memory upgrade. After all, it is 512k long (and there is no way they could reduce that economically) and so would need a minimum of a 1Meg machine. There is already a version of 2.0 for the A1000, which developers have been able to use for some time … making this available to A1000 owners would be a very cheap and easy upgrade path (although you could not use the enhanced video modes of course) Mike (Whapping from the UK)
#39164From: John PendergrassNov 2, 1991 2:41 PM
Just for info…. the official Commodore news release announcing the release of DOS 2.0 (nwrl.03.0991) specifically mentioned availability for A500, A2000 and A3000. Is silent on A1000. Of course that doesn't mean that a properly equipped A1000 (ie hardware upgrades) couldn't run it, or that Commodore may not later officially support it. –jp–seattle–
#39259From: Paul ToalNov 3, 1991 5:05 AM
It also mentions the un-availibity for the 2500 as well 🙁 I had to pull out the A2620 board to get 2.04 going. Slow pig. Paul –pt–not seattle– 😉
#39278From: BILL LEACHNov 3, 1991 8:55 AM
Paul; I am, and have been running 2.x on a 2500 for quite a few months now. The A2620 has to have a new set of ROMs but works fine under 2.04 with the new ROMs. -bill/ARS KB7LX