CompuServe Thread

#Cadalyst or Cadence??

6 messages in this thread
#21839From: Ralph GrabowskiNov 25, 1991 9:35 AM
Darn, that doesn't give me much incentive to keep writing.
#21865From: Jake Richter [Panacea]Nov 25, 1991 11:09 AM
Why? Do you feel slighted because you haven't written the editorials? <g,d,&r> Actually, your Generic CADD articles are well written and quite informative, but I feel (as an advertiser) that it's counter-productive to devote a lot of space to a product my products don't support. Jake
#22016From: Ralph GrabowskiNov 26, 1991 12:20 AM
Ah, but you are wrong. I, in fact, wrote two editorials (one under my name, another under someone else's name), as well as I've done plenty of editorializing. What? You haven't had your staff write any GenADI drivers yet? Ralph <G>
#22035From: Jake Richter [Panacea]Nov 26, 1991 6:10 AM
I've done some GenCADD drivers (just take a looksie at the latest TIGA driver that Generic is shipping), but nothing on a grand scale yet. The editorials you wrote, they haven't been in the last few months, have they? Those are the ones I thought were really good. Dave's prior editorials didn't seem to have as much information and punch as these latest ones. Jake
#22228From: Ralph GrabowskiNov 27, 1991 9:47 AM
No, I've never ghosted for David. Ah ha: so you do have a reason to advertise in the Generic CADD section: "You've been using Generic CADD with Panacea drivers. Now move up to AutoCAD and blah, blah, blah…" Regards, Ralph G.
#22267From: Jake Richter [Panacea]Nov 27, 1991 1:40 PM
Nice stretch <grin> Jake