CompuServe Thread

Imagesetter output

11 messages in this thread
#75085From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Oct 28, 1992 11:57 PM
[ continuation ] able to specify these parameters – DONT. This is an area where imagesetter manufacturers and Adobe have not communicated well. The PostScript file _should_ completely control all aspects of the output device's performance. However, some machines ignore the resultant PostScript code produced by programs that allow these two particular settings. It has been my experience that it is impossible to predict what an imagesetter over which you do not have direct, front panel control will do with re such information in the file. Therefore ALWAYS prepare your file as though you expect POSITIVE image output which is NOT reversed left for right. If you intend to get RC paper output you are all set. If you want a film negative, instruct the service bureau that you want a film negative RIGHT READING EMUSION DOWN. They will then control the mirror image and reverse tone values AT THE MACHINE (or via appropriate software that they use for such purposes). This will produce film correctly for burning a printing plate or for subsequent making of a paper positive. If you are doing silk screen work, ask for a FILM POSITIVE RIGHT READING EMULSION UP. If your bureau has trouble with _any_ of the concepts in the previous paragraph, go elsewhere. They should be able to explain those concepts as well or better than I have. Click on the 'Print' selection item. You will be presented with another requester window allowing you to specify the filename to which the PostScript code will be written. Save to an IBM floppy (720K) directly if you have CrossDos (or one of the other utilities that allow facilitate IBM file format). Or save to RAM: or Hard drive and then to a floppy. PgS will take care of putting the fonts into the file. In fact you can't tell it _not_ to. So you don't have to worry when your service bureau asks for you fonts. Tell them _everything_ is in the file. Give them the disk. Tell them it is an IBM disk. Tell them your file is a PostScript file. IT IS NOT AN ENCAPSULATED POSTSCRIPT FILE. Repeat that several [ MORE ]
#75332From: Soft-Logik Tech SupportOct 30, 1992 9:20 PM
We recommend that users set both mirror and negative for imagesetters. Unless your service bureau has told you specifically not to, novices should do this. In our experience, this is a better solution for more service bureaus. As an aside, our service bureau prefers files with mirror on and negative off. As well, we recommend 11.7 to users instead of 11.8, because some imagesetters won't handle 11.8. Aside from that, keep this up! You're saving me a lot of work. ;?XL{We put a small article on this in the next DTP World which is going to press right now. We should have it mailed out in a few weeks. Michael Soft-Logik
#75409From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Oct 31, 1992 4:11 PM
Michael, As an imagesetter operator, and as a former purchaser of imagesetter output and now as a consultant re imagesetter output (I am about to give a 3 day seminar here on Maui as a result of popular demand!) I recommend that you advise your customers NOT to use either the 'Negative' or 'Mirror Image' settings. You are only asking for trouble and will unintentionally mislead those whom you advise to use these settings. I appreciate the fact that you and your service bureau have apparently gotten comfortable with the combination of settings that you have indicated. I also appreciate the fact that _theoretically_ these settings should, especially in the hands of someone who understands _both_ PostScript well and the mechanics of the photomechanical reproduction process result in predictable output. Unfortunately, that is not the case. In the real world things don't always work as they should. I wrestled with this problem for quite a while, insisting to myself that if I put the correct instructions into the PostScript file, that the PostScript output device would faithfully obey the input stream. This is one of the situations in which communication between the creator program and the behavior of the PostScript output device just cannot be taken for granted. Take one of your files and send it to a number of different service bureaus. Give them no instructions, other than to output the file. The results will be a mix of results – probably 70% will have the wrong combination of Negative/Mirror attributes. Anything less than 100% reliability is unacceptable. The reason for this problem is not PostScript itself, which actually _is_ 100% reliable. It is the result of several years of general confusion regarding how to teach a suddenly exploding population of otherwise intelligent, but inexperienced (in printing industry matters) computer users just what Negative Image, Right-reading Emulsion Down, Right-reading Emulsion Up, Mirror Image, Reverse, Inverse, Horizontal Flip, Vertical Flip, Normal Image, etc. actually [ MORE ]
#75410From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Oct 31, 1992 4:12 PM
[ continuation ] means. Imagine the plight of the imagesetter operator trying to anticipate just what he is dealing with from a myriad of sources. Some files have one of the Negative/Mirror operators on, some both, some neither, and almost none of the senders of such files can really tell him what combination they have actually sent him! Chaos. The only way to avoid the chaos is to assume that every file has _both_ operators off and to isolate the PostScript interpreter from that particular kind of PostScript code. This requires the imagesetter operator (human type) to manually control the machine for Negative and Mirror output. Some manufacturers have done just this. Unfortunately, they have not been consistent across their model lines, and some cannot even tell you which of their machines do this or not! Therefore, the only way to get reliability, is to leave these settings alone. Always prepare output for an imagetter as though it is intended to print as a positive image with the image unreversed left to right, looking at the emulsion side of the imaging material. In other words, the way it would look coming out of a laser printer (or dot matrix for that matter). Then tell the service bureau what kind of output you need. Let them control their machine in this respect. True, after dealing with a particular bureau, they may tell you to prepare your output in a different way. But as general advice, I stick by my position. Also, many imagestetters _do_ image all the way to the edge of the imaging media. Mine images all the way to the edge of its 12 inch capacity. The user _should_ ask the service bureau what their capability actually is. But I certainly won't argue that 11.7" on a 12 inch machine is a conservative number which will avoid some potential problems. Unfortunately, it will also limit some jobs which need that last few millimeters to get the crop marks on. All this discussion underlines the importance of treating output to a high resolution device differently from sending output to an 8.5 x 11 capacity laser [ MORE ]
#75411From: Richard S. Rose,M.D.Oct 31, 1992 4:12 PM
[ continuation ] printer. It is NOT plug and play. I strongly recommend that anyone needing to use a service bureau contact them first and ask all the questions they can think of, THEN ask the bureau if there are any questions that they _should_ have asked but didn't. If the service bureau is not willing to spend the time answering all the questions and making every effort to assure correct output from the get go, seek another bureau. Also be prepared to pay for output OR output time if problems in output are the fault of the sender. We're updating our order sheet/advice form for imagesetter output. I'll send you a copy . . . no, I'll send you the Pgs file when it's done. 8) Rich
#75766From: Gold Disk Tech SupportNov 3, 1992 10:18 AM
Richard, Well said! Your discussion on Imagesetter output is appreciated. Have you thought about a book or perhaps an article on this subject. As you stated, many new and inexperienced user to the DTP world can really use this info. DTP software publishers can only supply so much…after that it is up to the user to `train' him/herself. Your info is invaluable. Philip Laitar Manager
#75798From: Erron AdamsNov 3, 1992 4:11 PM
I second your suggestion regarding a book on the subject absolutely. It's the sort of thing us "new and inexperienced" DTPers would give BIG support, I'm sure.
#75861From: Gracia M. LittauerNov 3, 1992 11:38 PM
And I third it. It's like pulling teeth to get the real low down on anything. This forum has been invaluable for giving aid to us neophytes. I keep all the advice posted here and reference it all the time. \c/ via Coolwhap __|__ Gracia
#75534From: Mike ToddNov 1, 1992 6:34 PM
Well, I would have to say that, in my experience, advising novices to set both mirror and neg is a recipe for _real_ trouble!! If all you want is a straight bromide that looks like the output of your laser, then mirror & neg must not be set unless the bureau specifically asks for them to be set (some bureaux have their setters set to produce mirror/neg for film output, and so you need to set them again to make sure it comes out right). The only time I've ever had to set mirror/neg was when I was going straight to film for plate production, and I wanted mirror/neg output. Of course, if your bureau is going to do the final printing for you, then maybe they too would like mirror/neg. If I were ever in any doubt about what was required I'd discuss it with the bureau before doing anything … and that would be infinitely better advice than getting novices to set mirror/neg!! Mike (from the UK)
#75539From: Christopher TolmieNov 1, 1992 6:57 PM
Mike, There had been times when we'd get a client's disk file, and told to produce a mirror, right reading, emulsion down film, so we'd set the imager to force those settings, upon processing the film we were suprised (this happened more than once) to find a nice positive left reading image! Of course they had saved their file (or set in the print prefs) those settings and didn't inform us of it. So our hardware settings simply reversed them again, very frustrating when your doing neg seps, that take many minutes per page. Chris
#75807From: Soft-Logik Tech SupportNov 3, 1992 5:41 PM
OK. All the service bureau's I've used (I've used 7 in various areas of the country) have wanted mirror on for sure, and all but one wanted negative. In fact there is a user in our vendor section who just posted a msg saying his imagesetter output worked fine except that he forgot to set mirror and negative. I guess it's six of one and half a dozen of the other. In short, users should ask their service bureau before printing to disk. Michael Soft-Logik