CompuServe Thread

BaudBandit/BackTalk

18 messages in this thread
#75934From: Michael DNov 4, 1992 11:29 AM
OK … As it stands now, I have BackTalk 1.55a, working through BaudBandit.device. It seems to work fine. The only problem is that it doesn't work with my serial.device, though ser: works with all other software. The interesting thing was that BackTalk 1.55a worked with serial.device the first time I used it. Then it crashed and never worked with serial.device again, although I recopied BackTalk, serial.device and BaudBandit.device. BTW, BackTalk's configuration window won't accept the name "BaudBandit.device" because it's too long. There isn't room in the configuration file (s:BT.CFG), either. So I changed BaudBandit.device to BBandit.device (it contains a reference to itself, which has to be changed too). My system is a 25 MHz A3000 with 2 Mb chip, 4 Mb fast, SCSI HD, and A2286 BridgeBoard. Enforcer is normally running, to make the Bridgeboard work.
#76087From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 5, 1992 12:45 AM
Michael, There is nothing in BackTalk that either modifies itself, or that modifies serial.device. In fact, nothing that would cause it to work with serial.device just once, and then never again. I note that you say there's no room in the config file for a long device name…that's true (it's 15 characters long including the trailing NULL byte)…I hope you didn't try to edit the config file, that certainly could cause some strange effects. Don
#76252From: Michael DNov 6, 1992 9:05 AM
Thanks. I have called BaudBandit.device "Bandit.device" so it's the same length as "serial.device". Some programs are having trouble with… serial.device. The last one I noted was TeleBase (TBASE.LZH in General Applications). It works if I edit it to use Bandit.device instead. Some other programs will still work with serial.device. It's weird; I don't know whose fault it is. For the moment, everything I want to use is working.
#76458From: Andy LevyNov 7, 1992 5:54 PM
I just downloaded BackTalk 1.55a and it doesn't work for me either. It starts up, and I can access all the menus, except for one thing -it does not communicate to my modem. It's the only program with this problem — everything else I have works, including NComm 1.9, NComm 2.0, GT (ADOS 1.3 only), and even Diga!. My system: A2000 w/5 Meg RAM, GVP Series II w/52Meg Quantum, df0:, df2:, and df3:, ADOS 2.04 and 1.32 (via Multistart), and Anchor Automation 2400E modem. The system's relatively standard, but there is one possible difference. It's one of the first U.S. 2000's, so old it had the problematic Cherry keyboard (replaced long ago however). That's the only thing I can think of — that BackTalk may have a problem with a very early hardware version. Any ideas? P.S. I got NComm 2.0, and it doesn't seem to work with Compuserve B. Did it ever? –apl
#76513From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 8, 1992 1:32 AM
Andy, I've got a very early 2000 (now a 2500) also, and it too came with the Cherry keyboard (also replaced long ago). So that's not the problem. What are your serial preferences set at…and are you using a 7 (or more) wire cable for the modem? Don
#76547From: Andy LevyNov 8, 1992 5:54 AM
BackTalk: 2400 Full 8N1 serial.device Init Cmd=AT Prefs: Handshaking=None 2400 8N1 My cable is a simple 3-wire data cable. According to the BackTalk docs, this requres Prefs to have the same settings, so I made sure it does. I hope it's not the cable. Every other comm program I've used in the last seven years has worked with it. –apl
#76589From: Steve AhlstromNov 8, 1992 1:23 PM
I believe the doc for BackTalk is specific — it requires a fully implemented serial cable (ie., 7 wire minimum). -sja
#76590From: Gopal GoenkaNov 8, 1992 1:31 PM
Andy, I have exactly same problem with BackTalk 1.55a. It just would not communicate with modem. Don Curtis suggested few remedies but they did not work. Everything else including BackTalk 1.51 works OK but BT 1.55a just would not. If you find a solution please let me know. Gopal on AutoPilot from Beatle city Liverpool, U.K.
#76651From: Andy LevyNov 8, 1992 9:21 PM
OK… but if there's a solution, it will have to be from one of the authors. I'll let you know if I get one. –apl
#76614From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 8, 1992 5:51 PM
Andy, Backtalk requires a 7 wire cable. You can get one at any computer store for a few dollars. Don
#76641From: Kelly JordanNov 8, 1992 8:28 PM
Don, I am using BT 1.55A with a 7 wire cable. To get BT to talk to the modem, I have to flip a switch on the bottom of the modem to force CD on. With CD not forced (off, since offline), nothing is sent to the modem. This is a bug, isn't it? Pretty hard to tell the modem to make a call if you can't send anything to it. I even went and changed modem cables to make sure the cable from my A1k (with gender changer for A2.5k) wasn't wired wrong. 73, Kelly
#76673From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 8, 1992 11:51 PM
Kelly, I'm using BT with a PM14400FXSA modem and have it set for CD to follow actual connect. Same with the Supra 2400 I was using before the PM14400. CD is definately not required for BT to work. What BT does though, is setup the serial port based on whether CD is active or not. If CD is active, it doesn't change the serial port's configuration. If CD is not active, then it changes the serial port's configuration based on what you've chosen in your current configuration file. Don
#76772From: Kelly JordanNov 9, 1992 5:16 PM
Don, That is not how BT1.55A is working on my system. My modem is a USRobotics Courier 2400 (ancient history already!) When CD is set to normal, BT will not send anything at all to the modem. Not even the Modem INIT string. When I put the switch to CD always On mode, BT will talk to the modem, even send the Modem Exit string, but it still does not send the Modem INIT string! Running the release 2.04 wb/ks on an A2.5k/020. 73, Kelly
#76822From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 10, 1992 12:46 AM
Kelly, That's right…when CD is set, BT won't send the init string because it presumes you're already online. Out of curiosity, what's your serial pefrences set to? Don
#76848From: Kelly JordanNov 10, 1992 6:40 AM
Serial preferences set at: 2400 bps, 512 byte buffer, no parity, 8 bits, 1 stop bit. Handshaking was tried with Xon/Xoff, RTS/CTS and None. The Handshaking doesn't make any difference. 73, Kelly
#76823From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 10, 1992 12:47 AM
Kelly, Oh yes, for what it's worth…I'm also on an A2500/20 under w/b 2.04. Don
#76652From: Andy LevyNov 8, 1992 9:25 PM
That's not what the docs say — see my message #76650 to Steve Ahlstrom. Also, see the previous message #76590 that seems to show a difference between verson 1.51 and 1.55, and the following message #76614 where a 7-wire cable doesn't seem to help. –apl
#76674From: Don Curtis/SYSOPNov 8, 1992 11:52 PM
Andy, I know that's not what the docs say…I didn't write the docs. Don