CompuServe Thread

#So, What's new(COMDEX)??

16 messages in this thread
#31529From: Michael KerpanNov 23, 1992 12:49 PM
PMJI– Could you tell me the model number of the new Toshiba CD-rom and also what dealer is handling it. Thanks MEK
#31531From: Albert DayesNov 23, 1992 2:08 PM
I think its a Toshiba 3301BC, there is a dealer mentioned in this forum. Paul of Kodak hgas mentioned it a few times too.
#31567From: Paul KudlachNov 24, 1992 12:53 AM
There is an article in Nautilus NewsBytes Vol 12-2 about new Toshiba drives. The number is 3401 not 3301–200ms access/300kbps transfer time. Available in internal, external or four-pak.
#31580From: Albert DayesNov 24, 1992 8:59 AM
Thanks for the correction on the model number for the Toshiba.
#31723From: Michael KnightNov 25, 1992 11:53 PM
I called Toshiba earlier this week and they noted that the TXM-3401 wouldn't start shipping until sometime in Feb 93. Sounds like an interesting drive. I'm holding off on my drive purchase until the 3401 comes out. Hope it won't be obscenely expensive… – Mike –
#31728From: Paul KudlachNov 26, 1992 12:30 AM
I was hoping what Toshiba said in their press release about December availability was true but I guess not. By the way, did you happen to to ask them about the interface? Is 16 bit SCSI/2 available or even better, (wish list) 32 bit VESA Local Bus SCSI/2? The release didn't say much about the interfaces. The price listed was $699 for the internal, $150 or so for the interface. It's a little obscene right now. I'm holding out for this thing too.
#31797From: Michael KnightNov 26, 1992 10:16 PM
Sorry Paul, I didn't ask about the interface. Certainly SCSI-2 would be the ideal. Probably should have asked about the controller card as well, i.e. who's controller, manufacturered by who, available drivers… I'll try and give Toshiba a call next week again and get this clarified, appreciate the ideas. Maybe I can get them to send a spec sheet (if it's available). If I can get some more specifics on the TXM-3401 I'll post here. If you're interested, here are the phone numbers I've collected: Toshiba (714) 455-0407 Chinon (800) 441-0222 Mitsumi (408) 970-0700 Texel (800) 886-3935 I wish you were right about December but sounds like the marketing folks got a little anxious. – Mike –
#31841From: Paul KudlachNov 27, 1992 10:46 AM
Sir Knight: Your gallantry shows in the noble quest for the speedy and versatile CD-ROM drive. In this quest a new possibility for our common cause: CD Technology Inc. 408-752-8500 (currently offers CD-ROM w/Toshiba 3301 subsystem–maybe 3401 in future?) In the 12/8/92 Coming Up section of PC Magazine I saw that they plan to do one of those roundups of CD-ROM hardware and software. This may useful to our cause. Using my time machine here, I took a look at some previous messages and came up with some other criteria. Photo CD compatibility Kodak's new format for pictures XA " ? CD-I Phillips new format multiple session capability ? I know that I've seen the terms XA and CD-I but at the moment all I can recall is that they are improved formats. I've seen multiple session come up and am not familiar with the term. It may not be possible to find a drive with all these capabilities. I don't know if Mr. Rubin is still tuning into this thread but here's some advice for his new 486 machine. Get a good VGA accelerator card. It really does make a difference in performance for MPC applications. Mike, I'll let you know if I come up with anything else. /EXIT
#31890From: Michael KnightNov 27, 1992 10:43 PM
Yes, it is a quest we embark upon to seek the elusive; and yet, journey upon waters yet to be explored. Gallant is the deed… In terms of Photo-CD, the ability to read CD-ROMs which have once been written to for initial establishment of photos and not filled, then the CD-ROM is called single session. If you should take the CD-ROM back to the photo processor to add additonal photos then this CD-ROM then becomes a multiple session CD-ROM. In other words, a CD-ROM written to more then once in non consecutive time. CD-I is Phillips new specification format for CD INTERACTIVE. You probably have seen some CD-I units like at Sears where the folks have been playing games on it with a television set as you walk by. It is my understanding that VERY FEW CD-ROM drives will have the ability to be Photo-CD (multiple -session), XA(e"X"tended "A"rchitecure), AND CD-I compatible. I think there is only 1 or 2 drives which can do this and I don't recall which ones they are. The Toshiba 3401 seems to satisfy 2 of the 3 and does it quickly. This will satisfy my requirements. I like the idea of what CD-I can do but I think it needs further maturing and market penetration before it becomes something I will worry about. Probably this time next year I'll need to revisit this issue. I agree with your comment about a good VGA accelerator card but be careful in the one you choose. My opinion is to choose one with a FEATURE CONNECTOR on it. Some good accelerator cards (like the ATI Graphics Ultra (which I have)) do not have this. If you are thinking future with possibly a NTSC video card, some NTSC cards require this option. – Mike –
#31899From: Rich Bowers/OPANov 27, 1992 11:15 PM
FYI for you and Paul Kudlach: CD-I requires a complete player, not just a specific kind of CDROM drive. It is a closed system intended to be used independently in conjunction with your tv, and uses its own format for recordin data on the CD. A source of confusion may be that the CD-I player happens to be a variant of the XA format, but this does not mean you can play a CD-I disc on a pc. You can't. The criteria for Photo-CD compatibility are 1) XA and 2) multi-session compatibility. The good nes is that there are increasing numbers of drives available with these characteristics. And some, like Toshiba, have upgrade paths that enable modification for Photo-CD multi-session capability. Hope this helps! Best — Rich Bowers
#31905From: Michael KnightNov 27, 1992 11:53 PM
Thanks Rich for the information. Seems like there is so much to consider when selecting a drive it can lead to a state of no decision or possibly wrong decision. This forum (and members like yourself) are the best way of trying to keep it straight. – Mike –
#31918From: Paul KudlachNov 28, 1992 5:22 AM
Thank you for information. I was getting a headache trying to sort all of these new developments. I enjoy your appearances in Nautilus and presence here.
#31917From: Paul KudlachNov 28, 1992 5:22 AM
Sir Knight: Your humbled companion is grateful to find such wisdom in this journey. I should have sought counsel long ago, for alas, I find myself in troubled waters, and fear for my fate… Too late! Last week I ordered a new system (local bus) with the ATI Graphics Ultra Pro VLB and was contemplating adding a Video Blaster(?). This quest has so many unexpected twists and turns and new bridges to cross. Thanks for the information on CD-I. I guess it's comparable to VIS being brought out by Tandy. And I agree with you that it still looks like an interesting educational and entertainment technology worth watching. In my search for MPC-ness (I checked the libraries for the MPC percentages-I didn't find it–maybe Mr. Bowers knows) this is what I came up with for my current 386-25mz machine: Not more than x% % of cpu usage My machine Ideal MPC Standard Display 62% 30% 40% Digital audio 5% 10% ? Data Streaming 89% 30% ? I knew that my CD-ROM was not MPC but I was surprised that my VGA was below the ideal. My only thought with accelerated VGA was that it would lower the load on the CPU, 386 or 486. Maybe Mr. Harris has a better insight in this than I do and can let us know the other two MPC percentages.
#31891From: Frank HarrisNov 27, 1992 10:46 PM
Your statement really does not hold true in that in order to meet MPC criteria, it "must use less than 40%" of the bandwidth, so therefore the use of a 386 or 486 really makes no difference. Frank Harris Computron, Ltd.
#31919From: Paul KudlachNov 28, 1992 5:22 AM
I thought that the use of accelerated VGA would take some of the load off the CPU. If you mean by bandwidth percentage of CPU used by the display, my current 386-25mz VGA display requires 62% of the CPU's time which is over the 40% you mention when I am running an MPC application. If you mean something else I'd appreciate being set straight. If you have the MPC % for digital audio and data streaming I appreciate that too, because I can't find that in the MPC documents I've looked at.
#31636From: Kevin J. MoranNov 24, 1992 10:59 PM
New Media magazine has it as a TXM3401E. 200ms/300kbps