CompuServe Thread

#Authoring System

9 messages in this thread
#65149From: Jim [PolyGone Cafe]Nov 5, 1993 4:31 PM
I'm looking for an authoring system that will: Interactive Do video Do audio Support standard formats ie… TGA, FLC FLI etc… …and hopefully is not Windows based and if it is requires minimum setup time. I need to be able to put these presentations on a disk send them to the user and let them run with it. Any suggestions??????? Please?????
#65170From: Tom RzoncaNov 5, 1993 7:38 PM
Unfortunately, Windows offers the best performance/ease of use for authoring. If you're bent on having your show run under DOS, then check out GRASP from Paul Mace Software (they're over in on of the Graphics Vendor forums). GRASP is real powerful, but it has a steep learning curve. Mathematica offers Tempra Show and Media Author, but those packages don't allow you to play back your flics from RAM unless you set up a RAMdisk. Playing back flics from disk is kinda slow and jerky. Also, what do you mean by "video"? Animation or AVI files?
#65219From: Mark ChambersNov 6, 1993 11:07 AM
Out of curiosity, what do you recommend for authoring under Windows. I'm just beginning the search myself for an authoring package and would like to know any recommendations you might have. Thanks,
#65244From: Tom RzoncaNov 6, 1993 3:49 PM
Mark: On the inexpensive side (way under $500), check out Asymetrix Compel, MacroMedia Action, HSC Interactive, Gold Disk Animation Works Interactive, and (my #1 choice) Image North Technologies ImageQ. Adobe Premier for Windows was just announced, and if it's anything like the Mac version, check it out! If you want to go for broke, check out Aimtech's Icon Author or MacroMedia's Authorware Professional (about $5,000. each).
#65292From: Angelo Guarino [DTI Inc]Nov 7, 1993 11:22 AM
Tom, I sell Image North products (mainly Inscriber), but I have not seen Image Q yet (but I will soon). Why do you feel are the features that make it your #1 pick? Ang
#65661From: Tom RzoncaNov 9, 1993 1:06 PM
Angelo: ImageQ is my #1 choice mainly because of its ease of use and high performance. I'm an artdirector/animator and simply don't have the time for extensive programming. ImageQ lets me jump right in and crank out a show quickly. ImageQ offers tremendous flexibility in handling MCI commands. You can load your animations into memory for silky-smooth playback, assemble a show with as many branches and levels of interactivity you may desire, gather and anlayze data from user input, work with variables, etc. Image North is also releasing an SDK for ImageQ, which means you can totally customize transitions, access any Windows DLL for custom effects, etc. I'm not saying that you get all the features of Icon Author or Authorware, but you get MOST of them for only $349! Take it for a test drive, and decide for yourself!
#65724From: Jim [PolyGone Cafe]Nov 9, 1993 7:28 PM
I thought alot about ImageQ, gave'm a call, got some info faxed, read some reviews and it all sounded great. Then…. a friend of mine in Atlanta said it was a real performance dog especially on a 386. Now I will be developing on a 486/66. Users may be running 386/33. Any performance problems there???
#65792From: Tom RzoncaNov 10, 1993 6:12 AM
You bring up a good point. A 486/66 is a LOT faster than a 386/33, so there will be a significant difference in performance. This is not only true of ImageQ, but ALL software. As a test for my shows, I load the program into a Compaq 386/25E after building it on a 486. The performance really isn't bad on a 386. If I know that a client will be using a lower end CPU for playback, I'll optimize the show for that machine. For instance, if the playback system has only 4 meg of RAM, I'm not going to load a 5 meg flic file and expect smooth playback. Makes sense, huh? As far as ImageQ being a "performance dog", I haven't had any problems with version 2.11, running in true-color mode with flics that average 5 meg each and 16-bit wave audio (the shows average about 20 meg each). Check the program out for yourself…
#65256From: John SchmidtNov 6, 1993 8:16 PM
Having used Macromedia's Authorware Professional and the editing capabilites of Adobe Premier for Windows, I can fully recommend this route. Kinda expensive, but very comprehensive. BTW, the Oct. 93 issue of "Imaging" magazine has a review of Authorware; I've also seen reviews of many authoring programs in recent other mags; I'll try to come up with a list.