CompuServe Thread

#Which Video Card?

7 messages in this thread
#66332From: Bailey BrownNov 13, 1993 5:08 PM
Why do you need VGA pass through? The Pagasus is based on the S3 928, which is a fast SVGA chip with graphics accelerator functions built in.
#66349From: David StinnettNov 13, 1993 7:17 PM
The S3-86C928 chip provides excelent windows perfomance and programs with drivers written specifically for that chip will run fine I'm sure, but DOS programs that use standard vga or VESA resolutions, such as Animator pro, will perform less than optimal on this chip. I have read reviews that rate the 928 chip as having so-so DOS performance. When playing flics out of Anipro on a slow DOS chip such as the older Matrox Impression cards (which I've tried) the frame rates can be painfully slow, even though Windows may run like lightning on the same chip. Boards such as the ATI or those based on the Tseng 4000 can run flics at double the speed of slower DOS chips. So, before I get a new video setup, I'll wait until someone comes up with an excellerator card that will pay attention to both Windows AND dos (few and far between!) or that provide a pass-thru option so I can have a choice to use the card that best suits the application.
#66362From: Bailey BrownNov 13, 1993 11:47 PM
Maybe you should look into the Tseng ET4000Wi or whatever the latest version is called. It has the same sort of gui accelerator functions as the 928 (but maybe not lines?) but is as fast as the old ET4000 in dumb framebuffer/vesa modes. Personally, I feel the S3 801/805/928 are getting a bum rap with respect to dos performance because the S3 911 and 924 were so bad. I've seen benchmarks that indicate that the 801/805/928 aren't that bad. I think alot of companies really don't understand the PC power user market very well and think that we are all a bunch of people with nothing but Windoze and Winmarks on the brain. I would much prefer to see fast dumb frame buffer access and bug-free Windows and OS/2 drivers rather than a board/driver that does 100 million winmarks, draws random junk all over the screen periodically, is slow as mud in vesa mode and doesn't work with OS/2. How fast do they think 2D graphics needs to be? I wish they'd use some of that effort to make some low-end 3D capable boards.
#66496From: David StinnettNov 15, 1993 12:11 AM
I hear the Tseng 4000 w/32i does dos faster than anybody, and I have used a first generation Herc dynamite board with the /w32, but to be honest, the difference between that and the ATI GU pro VL that I run now is barely noticable. If ATI came out with a 3 or 4 meg version, I'd get that and forget about any high end cards.(that is, I'd wait 6 mos. for ATI to clear all the bugs out of thier drivers, and then get one!) But as it stands now, I don't think a VL card with over 2 megs exists that will run everything fast. I don't even think there're any high end VL cards that will accept vga passthrough so you could at least pick a pair of boards that will do everything between them. Your certainly right about the cardmakers apparent attitude towards our needs. They seem to think "If your not in Win or Acad, why does it have to be fast?"
#66562From: Bailey BrownNov 15, 1993 11:59 AM
If I were you, I'd come up with a good dos/vesa benchmark and then get somebody to run it on an S3 928 board for you. If you are happy with your ATI GUP, then I think you will be happy with a 928. The 928's vga modes are not that slow and use the VRAM on the board unlike the ATI's SVGA part which uses the separate DRAM on that board and cannot use the VRAM that is there for the Mach32. Just to give you a data point, my NDI S3 805 VLB board gets a 3DBench (320x200x256 benchmark) of 43.4 (I think that number is frames/sec). It is dependant on cpu speed too, but slower SVGA's impact it alot. The fastest score I've seen is about 51. Both my machine and the one that got 51 were DX2/66's. I think the one with the 51 had a VLB ET4000 card.
#66592From: David StinnettNov 15, 1993 4:29 PM
Actually, I shouldn't be putting too much thought into this video thing because the last thing I should be putting money into right now is another video board. I think I'll wait a few months and then start checking into it again. It seems like every three weeks something new comes out so I would probably be wise not to worry now, because when I'm ready to get something there's a good chance there'll be boards out there that will do just what I wan't without compromising speed in any area. Hows that for optimism? <g>
#66653From: Brian Massey [Vibrant]Nov 15, 1993 8:33 PM
This doesn't fix the problem exactly, but if Animator is an issue, you might consider getting Vibrant's ProRes/Animator drivers and support that S3 928 chip directly. Send your address or call us at 800-937-1711 for details.