CompuServe Thread

#Toaster/PAR

9 messages in this thread
#93530From: jeff HolinskiOct 28, 1994 6:38 AM
Sorry to butt in here, What's Waterworld? Jeff H…
#93943From: sanford kennedyNov 2, 1994 11:50 PM
<Waterworld> Its another grandious effects movie….the icecaps melt, Denver is under water and everyone lives on rafts…lots of underwater FX stuff. Release spring or sunner next year. Sanford
#93988From: Grant BoucherNov 3, 1994 3:03 PM
><Waterworld> Its another grandious effects movie….the icecaps melt, >Denver is under water and everyone lives on rafts…lots of underwater FX >stuff. Release spring or sunner next year. > Sanford You know, a class in physics (or maybe a consultant) should be required for anyone writing or producing a special effects Sci-fi film… Ice EXPANDS when frozen, not contracts…therefore, when ice melts it LOSES volume. Add this to the fact that an Iceberg is 99% BENEATH the surface and that the vast majority of the frozen water in the world's ice caps is likewise beneath the surface, melting the world's ice caps would slightly LOWER world sea levels. Now, the artic cap is virtually entirely ice, but antartica is glacial and has a lot of ice on top of land (but not a hundred miles deep!), so even spreading this small volume of land-based ice flows across the world's oceans would not make an appreciable increase in world sea levels…certainly NOT to make Denver underwater :} Sheesh…why not just set the story on a non-earth water world or better yet, come up with a plausible way to add huge volumes of water to the Earth's environment…like a moon-sized ice asteroid, which would certainly melt on impact (<- (C) . They'll spend a hell of a lot more money on one single special effect than a decent script! Grant Boucher 1 of 2 Supervising Animators :} – Star Trek: Voyager – Amblin Imaging
#94000From: tony butterfieldNov 3, 1994 4:23 PM
real world physics 101 is just not cool enough for the general public. Tony Butterfield,Planisphere Productions.
#94011From: John BunnellNov 3, 1994 6:42 PM
Details, Schmetails. 😉 What was the water temp in Hawaii?? <:^) jmb
#94023From: Kent S. LidkeNov 3, 1994 9:32 PM
Hmm, If you melted all the ice in Antarctica, it'd raise the sea level about a hundred feet. They should've just set it on the coast. Besides, if the icecaps started to melt, they'd send the seaQuest to stop it. <g> Kent Lidke Helo Pilot on AutoPilot
#94025From: sanford kennedyNov 3, 1994 10:30 PM
Grant, You'll really like this, then…Denver is supposed to me under 18,000 feet of water! And guess who is the star: KEVIN KOSTNER, Huh? Yes. He'll be swimming across the nation's screens in '95. There is no logic in Hollywierd. Go figgure. I can't. Sanford.
#94059From: John GrossNov 4, 1994 2:06 PM
>> You know, a class in physics (or maybe a consultant) should be required for anyone writing or producing a special effects Sci-Fi film…<< Don't forget TV! Oh, but wait, you know that seaQuest had a consultant and we know how much they listened to him. As we all know, Hollywood is not based on reality. JG
#94081From: Anthony RamirezNov 4, 1994 7:23 PM
>Oh, but wait, you know that seaQuest had a consultant and we know how >much they listened to him. I was wondering what happened to the interesting chat we got from Ballard at the end of each episode, I guess he didn't want to be associated with a show that wasn't too realistic. <<< Tony D. Tracer >>> (Any render time >0 needs acceleration.)