CompuServe Thread

#Newt vs PBS

11 messages in this thread
#183362From: Pat MulletJan 27, 1995 4:52 PM
I'd love to, but it isn't my amiga; mine does run NickPrefs. I don't think the station will be upgrading the OS anytime soon, especially with NEWT gunning for funding for PBS. -Pat "Cruising the North Coast on Autopilot"
#183394From: Martin ConzemiusJan 27, 1995 11:27 PM
Pat, >especially with NEWT gunning for funding for PBS. Next thing you know he's going to want to pawn off Yellowstone, sell the Smithsonian to Disney, and increase his staff by 50%. And he's going to want to re-WALLPAPER his office. (weak attempt to stay on topic) -Marty
#183443From: Pat MulletJan 28, 1995 11:37 AM
Nah, the "I LOVE ME" pattern already adorns Newt's walls at the senate office building. I often wonder about the govnernment we elect. Guess we get what we deserve. -Pat "Cruising the North Coast on Autopilot"
#183493From: John Toebes/SYSOPJan 28, 1995 8:09 PM
>> Nah, the "I LOVE ME" pattern already adorns Newt's walls at the senate office building. It must have hurt terribly to have him confiscate it from your office… btw, would his office be at the Senate office building, considering he's the Speaker of the House? >> I often wonder about the govnernment we elect. Guess we get what we deserve. we *always* get the gov't we deserve; last november 8, we decided we deserved better.
#183492From: John Toebes/SYSOPJan 28, 1995 8:09 PM
>> Next thing you know he's going to want to pawn off Yellowstone, sell the Smithsonian to Disney, and increase his staff by 50%. Gee, that'd be great. Then maybe we wouldn't have diseased bison wandering onto ranchlands, and the Smithsonian might have more accurate exhibits.
#183522From: Steve AhlstromJan 29, 1995 2:17 AM
>> NEWT gunning for funding for PBS Let's see, the federal funding for PBS is 14% of their income. They obviously have demonstrated the ability to fund themselves to the tune of over a billion dollars annually. If PBS can't survive without the 14% (or $285M) from federal funds … tough. Barney is the 3rd richest entertainer in America, maybe he'll float them a loan. Big Bird and friends gross more in merchandising sales annually than the federal funding for PBS — PBS does not need federal funding. -sja
#183536From: Dale LarsonJan 29, 1995 8:17 AM
I'd prefer a to outlaw Barney at the same time we keep the 14% of funding.
#183573From: Paul IdolJan 29, 1995 4:42 PM
Hear hear! (I am =NOT= going to get in another one of those epic arguments though. Too expensive and time consuming.) Paul (aka Mr. Zombie)
#183549From: Pat MulletJan 29, 1995 11:55 AM
Look at the funding from anohter veiwpoint; we are a small market PBS station, 1/2 our funding comes from the college we are licensed to, 1/4 comes from local fundraising, and 1/4 from CPB/PBS. If we lose federal funding, it will hurt. -Pat "Cruising the North Coast on Autopilot"
#183558From: Steve AhlstromJan 29, 1995 12:49 PM
Pat, That still doesn't explain why PBS should continue to be federally subsidized. There are many other choices out there that, in my opinion, offer better or equal programming, more professionally produced, than PBS. In today's climate, where there are dozens, and soon to be hundreds, of choices, PBS can succeed of fail on their own like everyone else. They currently raise more than $1B a year in funding … there is no need for the taxpayer to kick in an additional 14% of their funding (or $285M). -sja
#183662From: Pat MulletJan 30, 1995 11:53 AM
Hey, I wouldn't mind if CPB found funding from another source–I hate being tied to the whims of the government. -Pat "Cruising the North Coast on Autopilot"