CompuServe Thread

#Open Letter to CEI

18 messages in this thread
#173594From: Jim SteeleNov 22, 1994 8:38 PM
I'd like to see any future systems designed to fit a clone case's footprint. Might as well take advantage of those cheap tower cases & power supplies. (Ship a 'BOING' sticker with bare motherboards, so the intel guys won't be confused {any more than usual}) Second, they need to get rid of those kludgey 1/2 speed HD floppies & support standard clone drives. MOS via Autopilot & Amiga
#173637From: Mark D. ManesNov 22, 1994 11:05 PM
The A4000T motherboard is designed to fit in a standard tower or desktop case. 🙂 Good news eh? -mark= Otto Pilot Engaged..
#173814From: Jim SteeleNov 23, 1994 7:02 PM
Yeah, that is good news…. assuming such a beastie as the 4000T motherboard ever materializes. 🙂 <fingers crossed> -Jim MOS via Autopilot & Amiga
#173643From: Rick GreenNov 22, 1994 11:38 PM
Good idea on the standard systemboard size (and the BOING sticker :^) But I believe there would be problems with the power supplies and clone floppy drives. I believe the Amigas power supply is different than a PC's power supply and there would have to be major hardware changes to get the Amiga to use standard clone floppy drives (probably with some incompatability, too). Rick Green Via AutoPilot
#173815From: Jim SteeleNov 23, 1994 7:02 PM
Like Dale said (and he should know…) the power supply isn't a real problem. That "Tick" signal the 2000 & 3000 used was just a 60Hz signal from the power line. I looked at it once with a scope, and it looked like someone took a sine wave and lopped off the tops with a zener. 🙂 It could be added to a stock PS.. Not only that, but the 500/600/1200 don't even use that signal, the power brick doesn't have it. I was figuring on changing the hardware to support standard drives. There's no reason to bother with that Motor/Ready business in a machine with a power supply the size of a 2000/4000. They only did that so all of the drive motors didn't start at the same time and stress out a 500 power brick. The other thing was distinguishing between 5.25" and 3.5" drives. I don't think there's any need to support the 5" disks any more. It sould be possible to use a standard floppy controller chip instead of upgrading Paula or it's AGA replacement… Why reinvent the wheel? You'd have to change the trackdisk, which seems doable.. At least, to steal a line from Dennis Miller, "That's my opinion, I could be wrong." 🙂 -Jim MOS via Autopilot & Amiga
#174065From: Rick GreenNov 24, 1994 9:47 PM
Well, now we know that the Powersupplies should be no problem. I'm still not convinced about the Floppy drives. Someone else mentioned the fact that the chip set would have to change to accomodate standard PC floppies as a replacement for Amiga floppies. I really haven't studied it; how well would it work? Rick Green Via AutoPilot
#174202From: Jim SteeleNov 25, 1994 8:14 PM
I can't say I've looked at it to closely either. I always meant to get CBM's hardware docs and try to hack together an autoconfig I/O board to play with. Too late now 🙁 Anyway, I figured on getting an off-the-shelf chip from NEC to do the actual controlling. and bypassing the custom Amiga chips altogether. It would probably lose the 880k and 1.6 MB modes though & fall back to 720K and 1.4MB. -Jim MOS via Autopilot & Amiga
#174264From: E.R. BujtasNov 26, 1994 6:53 AM
Yes.. And to make the Amiga more PC-like, use an Intel processor, and get rid of NTSC, and…. ..Think!
#174272From: Jim SteeleNov 26, 1994 9:06 AM
An intel processor? Let's watch our language, please. 🙂 I don't want to see the Amiga more PC-like, just to be able to take advantage of the stuff available for that market to a greater extent. After all, the cheap gigabyte HD's aren't made because of us Amigans… but we still use 'em. MOS via Autopilot & Amiga
#174219From: Jim Drew/UUINov 25, 1994 10:36 PM
This is simply not true. We are coming out with a Zorro II card that will let you use standard IBM 720/1.44/2.88 drives with your Amiga, to read *any* disk format. No need to CHANGE disk formats.
#174273From: Jim SteeleNov 26, 1994 9:06 AM
Great! I knew someone would do it. -Jim S. MOS via Autopilot & Amiga
#174301From: Rick GreenNov 26, 1994 12:44 PM
Well, if anyone can do it, it would be you, Jim 🙂 Rick Green Via AutoPilot
#174465From: Joe ClarksonNov 27, 1994 10:28 AM
<We are . . with Zorro II card that will let you use standard IBM 720/1.44/2.88 drives with your Amiga, to read *any* disk format . .> Great – When? Joe Clarkson
#174511From: Jim MaddoxNov 27, 1994 1:47 PM
>> Great – When? ^^^^^ You should know by now never to ask that of Jim Drew. 😉 – Jim, on AP!
#174118From: Dale LarsonNov 25, 1994 5:06 AM
Are there discrete floppy controller chips at a reasonable price? I think they are usually part of a larger chip set. It probably needs to be added to a gate array or ASIC already in your Amiga design. The software, by the way, is a bigger deal than the hardware. And think about how many games you are going to break…
#174150From: Jim MaddoxNov 25, 1994 12:47 PM
>> And think about how many games you are going to break… <g> Maybe that'll teach 'em to make their stuff HD-installable. – Jim, on AutoPilot!
#174203From: Jim SteeleNov 25, 1994 8:14 PM
I see a some FDC controller chip sets listed in my JDR catalog. None of them are more than $10 retail. My idea was to build an autoconfig IO board with the FDC chip mapped into the card's address range. But my hardware hacking experience is a bit dated, I haven't built anything major since my Z-80 homebrew in the early 80's. I do understand about the software, that's one reason I haven't tried it. My Z80 was the same way, I wasn't up to writing an OS by hand 🙂 Wasn't too woried about all the games I'd break. The idea was to keep the Toasters and such alive. I think the gamers have all gone to cloneland anyway. Heck, with a board like the Golden Gate II (not the Bridgeboard clone) it might even be possible to use an off-the-shelf pc type floppy controller card. -Jim MOS via Autopilot & Amiga
#174261From: Dale LarsonNov 26, 1994 6:32 AM
GGII should work for the hardware, but that still leaves you with the software and compatibility problems.