CompuServe Thread

#Packard Bell

9 messages in this thread
#174057From: Rick GreenNov 24, 1994 9:46 PM
Thanks for the support, Jim! Packard Bell PC's are so bad, my company refuses to service them (and we are a major retail chain). I can't believe anyone would willingly buy one. Heck, they even put a 'Warranty Void' sticker on the case, so you void your Warranty if you try to take the case off to install a card or memory! I don't like Gateway PC's, either, but they are a little better than Packard Bell PC's. Compaq makes a decent PC. Rick Green Via AutoPilot
#174115From: Jim MaddoxNov 25, 1994 4:17 AM
Rick – Packard Bell has to have the worst service I've ever had the unfortunate experience of attempting to contact. 40+ minute waits on hold…but at least it wasn't one of those snazzy new 900 tech support lines. <g> Even Commodore's service department was faster! My brother bought his DX2-66 minitower last August ('93) for $1800 from Damark; it looked like a bargain since other brands of DX2's were going for $2500 or so at the time. Well, the first thing that happened was that we found out Windows 3.1 wasn't included (why not include it with the high-end system when it's included in _all_ the other ones?), so he had to go buy a copy (student discount ;); we used Win3.0 in the interim. Next we had to download the required video drivers off the Packard Bell BBS! The stupid thing didn't even include a floppy with drivers! (That, BTW, was the first time I ever used a modem. 🙂 Anyway, we ended up downloading the _wrong_ set of drivers (confusion in descriptions), wasting about an hour (the fastest modem we had was a 1200bps at the time). So then we finally got the thing running. It was _much_ faster at PageMaker than the 286/20 he'd been using for the past few years. The next thing we discovered was that we couldn't disable ROM shadowing, so no TSR's could be loaded into high memory. We had to make boot disks for all our games. In fact, we can't even get Gunship 2000 CD to load anymore; it needs 580K free mem and the most we can possibly squeeze out is 570K. He bought a Compaq 486SX-33 with integrated VESA video for his girlfriend earlier this year. It was redrawing windows MUCH faster than his DX2-66. Then we looked at our old CompuAdd 333 Tower with their special Hirez video board — even it was faster than his! To top all that off, his computer is just an ISA machine, so he can't take advantage of any accelerators. Then, this past summer, he bought a 540MB hard drive to supplement the meager 160MB one that the system came with. Guess what happened when we installed it. Nothing worked. I took the 540 off and just put the 160 back. Nothing. My brother went out and bought two different IDE cables. Still nothing. I took the 160 off and tried the 540 by itself. Nothing. Desperate to get all the data off, I opened up the 333T, took out its SCSI card, reinstalled its original IDE card, and tried it out. It worked (after flipping the cable a couple of times — why don't they put a red dot on the pin corresponding to the red line?). I got the files off with a Syquest and then tried reinstalling it in the 486. Still nothing. So, he took it to the local (across town) Computer City to have it serviced. Fortunately, it was still under warranty, so they exchanged the hard drives at no charge. Then they installed the 540 and formatted everything. BUT…no video drivers again. Sooooo, I had to call up the BBS again (this time with a 14.4kbps modem on my 4000) and download the drivers. Except there was a problem — the colors weren't right (Jupiter from Microsoft Scenes had bad green fringes, among other problems). So I looked and downloaded again…nothing changed. So we called them up and got them to send us a driver disk…still no better. So we're just living with it now. Also, we had to reinstall Windows several times during the course of all this. Sometimes the video driver list wasn't updated correctly; sometimes the apps (like ATM) decided that they didn't like what we did and had to be reinstalled as well; and the stupid driver kept changing the _default_ colors every time we selected it! Then, the day before the warranty expired, the mouse went out. Fortunately, we got them to send out a new one (it works much better than the old one ever did, BTW.) Oh well. If he ever buys another PC, I'll make sure it's an Ocean DCA-2 (EDRAM) Pentium. You don't like Gateway? Why not? How about Dell? – Jim, on AutoPilot!
#174138From: Mal LansellNov 25, 1994 10:35 AM
Sounds like you'd have been better off building one from scratch! I've actually found it better to buy PCs from dealers who assemble their own – you get a better machine for a lower price, and when something goes wrong, they fix it – it doesn't have to go off to some distant service centre for several months. The only real problem I've had taking this route was a hard drive that gave up after 6 months – probably more to do with being posted to England and back a couple of times than any original fault! Mal Binary Dreams
#174147From: Jim MaddoxNov 25, 1994 12:47 PM
>> Sounds like you'd have been better off building one from scratch! We almost did…but then decided it would be easier if we just bought a pre-configured one. (Yeah, right. 😉 Damark's price also undercut the local dealers. Price was probably the determining factor in this case (my brother likes to buy the store-brand stuff instead of name-brand to save a couple of bucks ;). The primary problem I have with many of our local (West El Paso) PC dealers is that they tend to come and go rather quickly. I can only think of one that has actually stayed in business at least eight years. Of course, our only dedicated Amiga dealer (in East El Paso) opened in November '92 and closed in January '93. 😛 – Jim, on AP!
#174140From: Rick GreenNov 25, 1994 10:52 AM
Your story should be published in all of the PC mags! :^) It's amazing this machine sells so well, isn't it? I don't like Gateway's because they cause me headaches in my job. I work for a Reseller, and our Sales Consultants (I like to call them 'Order Takers') put the customers Gateway machines on a Service contract. I have found that Gateways, although very nice in appearance and quality of the keyboard, case, and options, has major problems with the system board (The onboard serial ports are constantly going bad). Thats when they find out that only Gateway can service Gateways. This is a major drawback, to me. They do not authorize any service centers to service their PC brand. To get one fixed, the customer has to call Gateway. Then, the representative will use the customer to try to debug the problem (and most customers know nothing about PC's). Then, Gateway will send them the part to install. Now, in some cases, a Gateway representative will come onsite to do service, but that could take time. That is downtime that could have been avoided. I am mostly talking about machines that are still under Warranty, which is the case on nearly every service call I get for Gateways. This is the only reason I don't care for Gateways. Rick Green Via AutoPilot
#174148From: Jim MaddoxNov 25, 1994 12:47 PM
>> It's amazing this machine sells so well, isn't it? That's not so amazing; it's cheap, it's preconfigured, it's cheap, it's extremely visible (in every department store, electronics store, computer chain store, and discount store), and it's cheap. <g> It's sort of the C-64 syndrome. Maybe that's a lesson for CEI. Actually, I remember that a few months after the A2000 was released, I saw a small (about 1/32 page) Dilliard's ad telling people to come see it. A few months later, I was in the store, and I didn't see any. I guess that's Commodore for you. 🙁 Well, anyway, thanks for the warning…back when my brother was mad at himself for getting the Packard Bell (a few months ago), he was thinking about getting a Gateway P5. I guess it's a good thing he didn't. – Jim, on AutoPilot!
#174406From: Malcolm O'BrienNov 27, 1994 1:06 AM
Jim, > It's sort of the C-64 syndrome. At least the C64 was a good computer and you got EXACTLY what you thought you were buying. Not so for the PCs! Malcolm
#174426From: Jim MaddoxNov 27, 1994 2:16 AM
>> At least the C64 was a good computer and you got EXACTLY what you >> thought you were buying. Not so for the PCs! "Yep" to the first and "Double Yep" to the second. 🙂 (BOY, that sysop moved these messages in a hurry! <g to sysop>) – Jim, on AP!
#174703From: Mal LansellNov 28, 1994 8:07 AM
>> C-64 syndrome Thats also how the CD32 did so well in the short time it was on sale. C= UK managed to get it into all manner of stores in the UK. I've heard figures of 100,000 units in 4 months. If thats true, its a shame the bankruptcy happenned when it did! Mal Binary Dreams